Charlie Kirk Thread

[magoo]

I don't know if this was posted. But seems to sum up the direction.



On another note, I accessed the forum via a public wi-fi and found it was on their block list. It's obviously part of a commercially collated list. Not one that's been thrown together by the venue.

The reason why cancel culture exists. It´s because courts don´t work. Cancel culture is the people answer to useless laws and judges. Which didn´t adapt to internet. And retarded concepts of free speech. Free speech is instigating the murder of someone????? What a joke. All rights have restrictions. Cause we live in a society and are not animals. The left thought they could play this game alone. What goes around...

The person who acts retarded should pay for their stupidity. Kimmel is evaluated by the people who watch his show. All american talk shows are shit nowadays. They have no humor. Only political correctness. What Kimmel needs is to pay damages for his stupidity. His stupid he pays. But if judges refuse to acknowledge this. Then you have this gay cancel culture bullshit.

 

[kevork]

The reason why cancel culture exists. It´s because courts don´t work. Cancel culture is the people answer to useless laws and judges. Which didn´t adapt to internet. And retarded concepts of free speech. Free speech is instigating the murder of someone????? What a joke. All rights have restrictions. Cause we live in a society and are not animals.

The person who acts retarded should pay for their stupidity. Kimmel is evaluated by the people who watch his show. All American talk shows are shit nowadays. They have no humor. Only political correctness. What Kimmel needs is to pay damages for his stupidity. His stupid he pays. But if judges refuse to acknowledge this. Then you have this gay cancel culture bullshit.

Concepts like free speech and the best idea winning only exist in the theater of people with broad spectrum high cognitive abilities. People for whom life is on easy mode in a technically advanced society. So Elon Musk, Thomas Sowell, etc. The lower someone's cognitive abilities, the less likely they are to follow some high philosophy that may be able to guide a genuine elite.

The idiot left has pretended to have principles for years, and to care about certain things. But there is ample evidence they don't. For example, I call you and tell you you're whole family was in a car accident. Your answer is a panicked, "Where are they? What happened? Are they alright?" When a black victim is hurt, you don't hear this from Libs. You don't hear any care for the black. They just care about using it to take power. In instances where the black victim turns out to be a victim of black-on-black, or a hoax. They just want it to go away. There is no care for the black. In some instances, like the Bubba Wallace faux-noose hoax, many leftists reply was, "What this tells us is what it would be like if it did happen." If they cared about racism, their response would be, "I'm so glad this is a hoax. America is not as racist as I thought." They want more racism, because it's been a multi-decade effective cudgel for taking power.

This endless hypocrisy has been largely the preserve of the left, as they have had pretty much all power. We don't have a good idea how the right will use it, as they have had little power.




Most principles and cares are just tools for the friend-enemy distinction. They exist when it's useful, and don't when its not.




I have my in-group, which is whites, and to a lesser extent Christians. There are other groups who I have an affinity and respect for, like Japanese. Other groups like Somalis - I am hostile to. Because they are an inherently uncivilized and hostile people, whose aim it is to destroy an environment I'd like to live in, replacing it with their putrid offering. It's only within the in-group that you can have principles that will be broadly followed without the need for zealous force. But even then, I think free speech is a terrible idea. There is a narrow spectrum of things which a society needs to survive and perpetuate itself into the future. Free speech has primarily been used to tear down Christianity, stable family and social structures, and white society. My out-group are the third world invading horde. I want complete separation from them. They have no common principles. They are arriving in their millions, using principles to destroy us, and ignoring them to rape and take whatever they can. Get rid of them. All of them.

 

[PurpleUrkel]

And if youre wrong it´s a tremendous injustice that nobody deserves specially a girieving mother.

I don't view it that way. Having worked for rich and famous people I just call it like I see it. I'm just sitting here on an anonymous Internet forum spouting opinions and ideas. Knowing that the public figures I critique will never read what I write much less be hurt by it. If a tree falls in the woods and nobody is there to hear it does it make a sound?

I'm actually quite tempered in what I say around here... If I gave my unfiltered thoughts and opinions I would no doubt be banned. And so there is no such thing as free speech unless you are willing to suffer the consequences. I am not, and so I temper my words.

What happened to Charlie Kirk is a very sad state of affairs. He did not deserve to die in the way in which he did simply for stating his opinions in public. However, to me he is a stranger to whom I have no emotional attachment. Something around this whole thing does not seem right. The confusing narrative surrounding his public assassination and what is now becoming an over reaction to one man's death all just seem too hyper emotional, yet at the same time devoid of any true emotion. In many ways this is starting to feel like a staged episode of MTV's The Real World. In the world in which I inhabit, every great and true person I've ever known grieves in private like a stoic... They do not go out in public announcing their grief and informing us of their future career and business plans.

 

[magoo]

I don't view it that way. Having worked for rich and famous people I just call it like I see it. I'm just sitting here on an anonymous Internet forum spouting opinions and ideas. Knowing that the public figures I critique will never read what I write much less be hurt by it. If a tree falls in the woods and nobody is there to hear it does it make a sound?

You don´t know that. Someone can read you and start harrassing the woman. And even if your right which I think you are. It´s too f early. The man was shot one week ago. You are doing what you are accusing her off.

I'm actually quite tempered in what I say around here... If I gave my unfiltered thoughts and opinions I would no doubt be banned. And so there is no such thing as free speech unless you are willing to suffer the consequences. I am not, and so I temper my words.

Likewise. Even though I get suspended every month.

What happened to Charlie Kirk is a very sad state of affairs. He did not deserve to die in the way in which he did simply for stating his opinions in public. However, to me he is a stranger to whom I have no emotional attachment. Something around this whole thing does not seem right. The confusing narrative surrounding his public assassination and what is now becoming an over reaction to one man's death all just seem too hyper emotional, yet at the same time devoid of any true emotion. In many ways this is starting to feel like a staged episode of MTV's The Real World. In the world in which I inhabit, every great and true person I've ever known grieves in private like a stoic... They do not go out in public announcing their grief and informing us of their future career and business plans.

Her husband was shot in front of her. Do you think she has any autonomy on her decisions? She gets any saying? A woman alone around high predatory lunatics? She is a puppet. They press play and she acts. I´m sure she doesn´t want to die in a car crash. If she is doing anything suspicious which I have no idea. it´s for her sake and her children sake.
There is a narrative in play and they are controlling it.

Charlie Kirk assasination can never ever occur without the complicit involvement o law enforcement. Both in the hit as in the cover up. No F way.People who say otherwise are completely oblivious to the level of information the government has. And if by any chance this was just a lunatic that shot. It was because someone didn´t pay attention to the alert sign which started to blink in the computer screen. But it´s not the case. Here it´s a plot. Without a single shred of doubt.

There are trillions at stake. Mafia do what they do for millions. Government handles trillions. They have special forces at their disposal. Specially US government. Which is considered the biggest richest and most powerful mafia in the world. Government is like mafia less violent.

Also all this people are useless. Do you see them making any real work. Do you see Trump or any other politician doing work. They are dependent on this fiction because they cant do anything else. Maybe sell time shares. Trump is a little bit different. Because he has vision. He is just a slob. But he can see what others don´t. Almost an artist.

Some people here don´t understand the level of sordidness that exists in high level shit. A mix of naivety and innocence in this thread which is good and uplifting actually. We don´t have to look into all car crashes on the road. A business owner will have a different take on this event than the business employee. Emplyees are more shielded in a way.

All this shit might backfire on Israel. Just like Charlie went down. Israel is bringing a lot of unwanted attention. Let´s see what comes next.

 

[magoo]

Concepts like free speech and the best idea winning only exist in the theater of people with broad spectrum high cognitive abilities. People for whom life is on easy mode in a technically advanced society. So Elon Musk, Thomas Sowell, etc. The lower someone's cognitive abilities, the less likely they are to follow some high philosophy that may be able to guide a genuine elite.

The idiot left has pretended to have principles for years, and to care about certain things. But there is ample evidence they don't. For example, I call you and tell you you're whole family was in a car accident. Your answer is a panicked, "Where are they? What happened? Are they alright?" When a black victim is hurt, you don't hear this from Libs. You don't hear any care for the black. They just care about using it to take power. In instances where the black victim turns out to be a victim of black-on-black, or a hoax. They just want it to go away. There is no care for the black. In some instances, like the Bubba Wallace faux-noose hoax, many leftists reply was, "What this tells us is what it would be like if it did happen." If they cared about racism, their response would be, "I'm so glad this is a hoax. America is not as racist as I thought." They want more racism, because it's been a multi-decade effective cudgel for taking power.

This endless hypocrisy has been largely the preserve of the left, as they have had pretty much all power. We don't have a good idea how the right will use it, as they have had little power.

View attachment 23806


Most principles and cares are just tools for the friend-enemy distinction. They exist when it's useful, and don't when its not.


View attachment 23805

I have my in-group, which is whites, and to a lesser extent Christians. There are other groups who I have an affinity and respect for, like Japanese. Other groups like Somalis - I am hostile to. Because they are an inherently uncivilized and hostile people, whose aim it is to destroy an environment I'd like to live in, replacing it with their putrid offering. It's only within the in-group that you can have principles that will be broadly followed without the need for zealous force. But even then, I think free speech is a terrible idea. There is a narrow spectrum of things which a society needs to survive and perpetuate itself into the future. Free speech has primarily been used to tear down Christianity, stable family and social structures, and white society. My out-group are the third world invading horde. I want complete separation from them. They have no common principles. They are arriving in their millions, using principles to destroy us, and ignoring them to rape and take whatever they can. Get rid of them. All of them.

Kevork should be doxxed and someone kill him. For some idiots this is free speech. Everytime someone says this is free speech. An add on a newspaper should be published with the adress of said person. With the title kill him. Hey free speech right?

 

[ginsu]

Concepts like free speech and the best idea winning only exist in the theater of people with broad spectrum high cognitive abilities. People for whom life is on easy mode in a technically advanced society. So Elon Musk, Thomas Sowell, etc. The lower someone's cognitive abilities, the less likely they are to follow some high philosophy that may be able to guide a genuine elite.

The idiot left has pretended to have principles for years, and to care about certain things. But there is ample evidence they don't. For example, I call you and tell you you're whole family was in a car accident. Your answer is a panicked, "Where are they? What happened? Are they alright?" When a black victim is hurt, you don't hear this from Libs. You don't hear any care for the black. They just care about using it to take power. In instances where the black victim turns out to be a victim of black-on-black, or a hoax. They just want it to go away. There is no care for the black. In some instances, like the Bubba Wallace faux-noose hoax, many leftists reply was, "What this tells us is what it would be like if it did happen." If they cared about racism, their response would be, "I'm so glad this is a hoax. America is not as racist as I thought." They want more racism, because it's been a multi-decade effective cudgel for taking power.

This endless hypocrisy has been largely the preserve of the left, as they have had pretty much all power. We don't have a good idea how the right will use it, as they have had little power.

View attachment 23806


Most principles and cares are just tools for the friend-enemy distinction. They exist when it's useful, and don't when its not.


View attachment 23805

I have my in-group, which is whites, and to a lesser extent Christians. There are other groups who I have an affinity and respect for, like Japanese. Other groups like Somalis - I am hostile to. Because they are an inherently uncivilized and hostile people, whose aim it is to destroy an environment I'd like to live in, replacing it with their putrid offering. It's only within the in-group that you can have principles that will be broadly followed without the need for zealous force. But even then, I think free speech is a terrible idea. There is a narrow spectrum of things which a society needs to survive and perpetuate itself into the future. Free speech has primarily been used to tear down Christianity, stable family and social structures, and white society. My out-group are the third world invading horde. I want complete separation from them. They have no common principles. They are arriving in their millions, using principles to destroy us, and ignoring them to rape and take whatever they can. Get rid of them. All of them.

Even if it was only high cognitive individuals, it would not matter as the game is rigged. Democracy can't function in capitalism, and free market ( ideas ) can't function when banks are controlled privately. They fund / direct energy to whatever movement or idea they want to come out on top. Even science works like this. It was all a set up from the start and we are stuck getting played by this sad joke ever since. Ive never been more certain that voting is meaningless apart from token resistance. Elon musk is probably just a front man for the actual rich, just like jeffrey epstein. We are supposed to believe royal & presidential famlies and people like bill gates, zuckerberg, bezos, buffet are the highlight of human intellect and performance. I dont buy it, they are bought puppets to parade for the public likely not as smart as we are supposed to believe which is why they are able to play their roles.

I just looked up the meaning of token resistance to check that it means what i intended it to mean, turns out its been co-opted by the marxist agenda, the irony of this is perfect for the clown society we live in. I do not want to say clown world because the world itself is good as its created by God with an abundance of beauty and more resources than we could wish for. If only humans & satans children could stop f.ing everything up for ourselves.

All we have left is the truth they own everything else. Despite this i am not blackpilled there are plenty of things to do, we have a lot of agency in our own lives to choose what is good and change our consumption and lifestyle patterns as a way to reject evil. Working on becomming a better follower of God as Charlie Kirk was an example of this.