Concepts like free speech and the best idea winning only exist in the theater of people with broad spectrum high cognitive abilities. People for whom life is on easy mode in a technically advanced society. So Elon Musk, Thomas Sowell, etc. The lower someone's cognitive abilities, the less likely they are to follow some high philosophy that may be able to guide a genuine elite.
The idiot left has pretended to have principles for years, and to care about certain things. But there is ample evidence they don't. For example, I call you and tell you you're whole family was in a car accident. Your answer is a panicked, "Where are they? What happened? Are they alright?" When a black victim is hurt, you don't hear this from Libs. You don't hear any care for the black. They just care about using it to take power. In instances where the black victim turns out to be a victim of black-on-black, or a hoax. They just want it to go away. There is no care for the black. In some instances, like the Bubba Wallace faux-noose hoax, many leftists reply was, "What this tells us is what it would be like if it did happen." If they cared about racism, their response would be, "I'm so glad this is a hoax. America is not as racist as I thought." They want more racism, because it's been a multi-decade effective cudgel for taking power.
This endless hypocrisy has been largely the preserve of the left, as they have had pretty much all power. We don't have a good idea how the right will use it, as they have had little power.
View attachment 23806
Most principles and cares are just tools for the friend-enemy distinction. They exist when it's useful, and don't when its not.
View attachment 23805
I have my in-group, which is whites, and to a lesser extent Christians. There are other groups who I have an affinity and respect for, like Japanese. Other groups like Somalis - I am hostile to. Because they are an inherently uncivilized and hostile people, whose aim it is to destroy an environment I'd like to live in, replacing it with their putrid offering. It's only within the in-group that you can have principles that will be broadly followed without the need for zealous force. But even then, I think free speech is a terrible idea. There is a narrow spectrum of things which a society needs to survive and perpetuate itself into the future. Free speech has primarily been used to tear down Christianity, stable family and social structures, and white society. My out-group are the third world invading horde. I want complete separation from them. They have no common principles. They are arriving in their millions, using principles to destroy us, and ignoring them to rape and take whatever they can. Get rid of them. All of them.
