Charlie Kirk Thread

[PurpleUrkel]

Everytime he talked about the death penalty, he is referring to it as a judicial punishment. Show me a clip where he appeals to mob justice or personal vengeance.

It's not about "mob justice" it's about good, honest, hardworking Christian people defending themselves against Muslim, Hindu, jewish, and Hispanic invaders before "personal vengeance" is required. We are at war, and so what does the Bible say about killing your enemy in a time of war? I'm talking Old Testament as the New Testament is quite obviously a jewish psyop to get Christians to lay down their arms and embrace their Christ-denying (((oppressors))) with forgiveness and open arms.

Personally, I'm not all that concerned with what Charlie Kirk thought or believed as I don't see him as a highly intelligent and spiritual person. He seemed more like a Joel Olstein evangelical type who preached about the virtue of a simple life of Jesus-like poverty and good deeds towards the poor yet lived a life of fame and luxury. Just another new age evangelical hypocrite in bed with the jews, hence the previous title of this thread (which it should be returned to in pursuit of academic and historical honesty), "Charlie Kirk Ziocuck."

This doesn't follow at all. The scriptures about the obeying the government are not talking about some ideal Christian government. They are specifically referring to the pagan Romans who had conquered Israel. Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's is talking about the Roman Emperor, regardless of his many flaws.

Again, New Testament "stuff." We must use our God given brain to think for ourselves on modern existential dilemmas. And in no way do I believe that God wants me to lie down and take it while jews and muzzies destroy my Christian people's way of life. The government is run by Antichrist jews and evangelical zionists and you want me to obey their laws and commands? I don't think so.

 

[Northumber]

I'm talking Old Testament as the New Testament is quite obviously a jewish psyop to get Christians to lay down their arms and embrace their Christ-denying (((oppressors))) with forgiveness and open arms.

I must be missing context from another thread.

 

[Tippy]

I must be missing context from another thread.

Yeah what is this guy supposedly a Catholic as well but denying the NT?

 

[GodfatherPartTwo]

Personally, I'm not all that concerned with what Charlie Kirk thought or believed as I don't see him as a highly intelligent and spiritual person. He seemed more like a Joel Olstein evangelical type who preached about the virtue of a simple life of Jesus-like poverty and good deeds towards the poor yet lived a life of fame and luxury. Just another new age evangelical hypocrite in bed with the jews, hence the previous title of this thread (which it should be returned to in pursuit of academic and historical honesty), "Charlie Kirk Ziocuck."

You have a damned if you do/damned if you don't mentality towards Kirk.

I'm talking Old Testament as the New Testament is quite obviously a jewish psyop to get Christians to lay down their arms and embrace their Christ-denying (((oppressors))) with forgiveness and open arms.

This is pure insanity. Watch that in your hatred of Jews you don't become one.

 

[PurpleUrkel]

Watch that in your hatred of Jews you don't become one.

Please don't attribute the words "hate jews" to me. Hate implies wanting to do harm to someone and I have no such desires or inclinations. I have a strong dislike towards jews, I am a counter-semite, not an antisemite. Much less do I waste my time "hating" anonymous jews "out there," and the two jews I do know I like and get along with.

Yeah what is this guy supposedly a Catholic as well but denying the NT?

It's a bit more subtle, grey, and nuanced than the stark black and white terminology you are using. The New Testament isn't the issue here, the real issue is that The Bible has been altered throughout its history by our enemies (the usual suspects) as an act of psychological warfare to get us to "turn the other cheek" while (((they))) subjugate us and financially rape the world in pursuit of unlimited usury.

Mission (Almost) Accomplished.

 

[Northumber]

The New Testament isn't the issue here, the real issue is that The Bible has been altered throughout its history by our enemies (the usual suspects) as an act of psychological warfare to get us to "turn the other cheek" while (((they))) subjugate us and financially rape the world in pursuit of unlimited usury.

Do you have a thread open about this? I disagree about alterations (unless you are talking about the weird translations ... like Jefferson's, or Scofield with it's "notes", or Mormon, or modern woke translations).

 

[PurpleUrkel]

Do you have a thread open about this? I disagree about alterations (unless you are talking about the weird translations ... like Jefferson's, or Scofield with it's "notes", or Mormon, or modern woke translations).

Yes, I'm talking about all of that bullsh*t. And you think those are the only "weird" translations? No way, those are just the ones we know about. They're called "secret societies" for a reason. Historically if you want to hurt your enemy you burn their books (their history) and alter their important religious texts. It's the oldest trick in the book. The original psyop.

You have a damned if you do/damned if you don't mentality towards Kirk.

No I don't. I never cared for Charlie Kirk and I think he was a Ziocuck as this thread title once accurately reflected. But like many I felt sympathy for his plight which softened me up a bit to the psyop that has been his death. However, seeing the cash grab response of TPUSA, the weird "facts" and confusing details of his assassination, and the strange reaction to his death by those closest to him, I have come full circle back to my original sentiment on the subject. I think Kirk and his enterouge were/are most likely charlatans seeking attention and money above all else (because birds of a feather flock together). God, and doing the will of God were not their primary objective which is most likely why his life ended in the chaotic, dark, and violent way that it did.

You just don't wind up getting "assasinated." People often bring that sh*t onto themselves by working in the shadows and going down to the crossroads and making deals with the devil (and/or his disciples, the jews).

 

[GodfatherPartTwo]

The Bible has been altered throughout its history by our enemies (the usual suspects) as an act of psychological warfare to get us to "turn the other cheek" while (((they))) subjugate us and financially rape the world in pursuit of unlimited usury.

Can you cite any evidence for this? Textual variants are one thing. Translations are another. But you seem to have more of a problem with Jesus' teachings than anything else.

No I don't. I never cared for Charlie Kirk and I think he was a Ziocuck as this thread title once accurately reflected. But like many I felt sympathy for his plight which softened me up a bit to the psyop that has been his death. However, seeing the cash grab response of TPUSA, the weird "facts" and confusing details of his assassination, and the strange reaction to his death by those closest to him, I have come full circle back to my original sentiment on the subject. I think Kirk and his enterouge were/are most likely charlatans seeking attention and money above all else. God, and doing the will of God were not their primary objective which is most likely why his life ended in the chaotic, dark, and violent way that it did.

You just don't wind up getting "assasinated." People often bring that sh*t onto themselves by working in the shadows and going down to the crossroads and making deals with the devil (and/or his disciples, the jews).

If he was assassinated for turning down Jew money and beginning to question Israel, how was he a ziocuck? You could say he started out that way, but he certainly didn't go out that way.

 

[Wutang]

I thought if anything saying that you accept the Old Testament while rejecting the New Testament makes you more of a Jew - not less.

 

[PurpleUrkel]

Can you cite any evidence for this? Textual variants are one thing. Translations are another. But you seem to have more of a problem with Jesus' teachings than anything else.

Take a look around. What do you think has happened here? The evidence is right before you. Christians misinterpreted scripture and wound up with a usurious jew boot on their neck. And nowhere does Jesus insist that we must allow ourselves to be attacked without defending ourselves. And yet here we are.

I thought if anything saying that you accept the Old Testament while rejecting the New Testament makes you more of a Jew - not less.

Don't think. This is exactly the issue with Biblical "gotcha." Don't drink, don't fornicate out of wedlock, treat people well, be kind, eat well, lend help to those less fortunate than yourself, read The Bible, go to church, exercise, don't be greedy, don't accept money you haven't truly earned, work hard, be honest, don't watch porn, don't smoke, pray everyday, accept Jesus Christ as your Savior, and defend yourself and your loved ones against external threats of evil and unjust persecution by unrepentant attackers.

Could care less where, when, and by whom these "suggestions" and rules were written. The important lesson is to think for yourself and not believe everything you read. The written word is easily manipulated.

 

[Iakobos]

Take a look around. What do you think has happened here? The evidence is right before you. Christians misinterpreted scripture and wound up with a usurious jew boot on their neck. And nowhere does Jesus insist that we must allow ourselves to be attacked without defending ourselves. And yet here we are.

How did Christians take over the Roman Empire?