Given that 95% of Bitcoin has already been mined, and no actual economic value was produced in exchange for any of it (just electricity wasted), why should anyone in the future voluntarily exchange their goods/labor for Bitcoin?In the bitcoin game, you produce value for others to get more bitcoin.
In a free market rising prices causes redistribution which is what will happen with Bitcoin over time whales will sell down some of their holdings to buy mansions, Ferraris, yachts, private islands etc or to diversify into other assets and other people will buy up some of those coins that the whales sell.Given that 95% of Bitcoin has already been mined, and no actual economic value was produced in exchange for any of it (just electricity wasted), why should anyone in the future voluntarily exchange their goods/labor for Bitcoin?
Can you guys at least be honest about your fantasy of becoming neo-feudal lords via owning Bitcoin, and stop pretending that you are advocating for some sort of perfectly fair economic system? If you were actually interested in fairness and honest value exchange, you would advocate for some sort of distribution mechanism to redistribute Bitcoin out of the hands of whales (where the vast majority of it is currently hoarded) and into the hands of people who would at least theoretically use it for exchange. But literally no one in the Bitcoin space is advocating for this. They're all just trying to pump their bags.
And to be clear, I don't fault them (or you guys) for wanting to pump your bags. It's only natural. But it's just one more reason why Bitcoin will never be what you think it will be: because past a certain point, there is simply no incentive for any new players to join the game.
I get annoyed with Boyle, because he has such a midwit normie take on economics and has an incomplete understanding of a lot of things. It seems like he is getting fed this stuff from somewhere.
Exactly...couldn't have said it better myself.In a free market rising prices causes redistribution which is what will happen with Bitcoin over time whales will sell down some of their holdings to buy mansions, Ferraris, yachts, private islands etc or to diversify into other assets and other people will buy up some of those coins that the whales sell.
As far as mining creating economic value: its not the new bitcoins created that is the value provided: it is the network security. The block subsidy and fees are simply the transfer of value from the users of bitcoin, to the security providers of bitcoin.Given that 95% of Bitcoin has already been mined, and no actual economic value was produced in exchange for any of it (just electricity wasted), why should anyone in the future voluntarily exchange their goods/labor for Bitcoin?
Great idea! Like most things about bitcoin, its already been done and thought of...Enter a captcha, get 5 bitcoins!Can you guys at least be honest about your fantasy of becoming neo-feudal lords via owning Bitcoin, and stop pretending that you are advocating for some sort of perfectly fair economic system? If you were actually interested in fairness and honest value exchange, you would advocate for some sort of distribution mechanism

The people that valued bitcoin...why should they give it to people who don't value it? How is that fair?to redistribute Bitcoin out of the hands of whales (where the vast majority of it is currently hoarded) and into the hands of people who would at least theoretically use it for exchange. But literally no one in the Bitcoin space is advocating for this. They're all just trying to pump their bags.
None of us are pumping our bags...that's the old world, the fiat world. I don't do this to try to benefit myself, I do it for the benefit of others (hard to imagine, from a fiat lens, I know). There is no point to which bitcoin stops going up! Bitcoin has no top because fiat debasement will continue, forever. It mathematically has to.And to be clear, I don't fault them (or you guys) for wanting to pump your bags. It's only natural. But it's just one more reason why Bitcoin will never be what you think it will be: because past a certain point, there is simply no incentive for any new players to join the game.
Yeah, more money in bitcoin makes the price go up.The only valid point in his video in my humble opinion is that the skyrocketing increase in price was due to new participants. ETFs bringing in new money (increasing demand in the hundreds of bookings).
Not sure if there is any one catalyst. Maybe more small and medium companies start to keep it as a balance sheet asset, instead of cash...(profitable companies, not meme stonks.)In a simple supply/demand view, what would be the catalyst to push Bitcoin above the $125k ATH?
Bitcoin isn’t the dominant money yet. When it is, people will demand it. I have seen more interest over the last 2 years than ever before…enough at work that I will be facilitating a Socratic seminar on bitcoin topics soon.^
All of this is just crazy circular logic talk at this point in time as the air has quite obviously just been sucked out of bitcoin (and crypto in general). If you are involved in retail sales where you interact with actual human beings doing real world point of sale economic exchange you can just feel it on the ground that the human psyche has lost it's interest and fascination with bitcoin. Nobody talks about it, nobody mentions it, much less do they ask to use it or if you accept it (gold is a different story as you'll actually overhear customers talking about it). Customers talk about Zelle, and Apple Pay, and CashApp, and Venmo, and they ask questions like, "Do you accept cash?" but not once has a customer ever asked if we accept bitcoin.
So….is it more fair that whales hoard it or distribute it? You just said they are doing both…which one are you claiming is unfair?The price is tanking and will continue to tank because nobody understands it (a feature not a bug) and because you can't print more of it and a bunch of (((whale))) jews are hording the rest. But of course the jew teenager Robber "Barron" Trump pumped and dumped for $300 million right in your face, but don't believe your lying eyes on that with (((It's))) corresponding price drop (once again leaving the little guy holding the bag).
Are you claiming that counterfeiting new dollars, without providing any work or value, is necessary to have electricity? I don’t understand.Yeah, let the printing presses go "burrrrr," the US dollar is keeping the US electric grid going 24/7, 365 because there is not a finite supply of them (let that sink in).
Bitcoin prevents Mad Max…number go down for everyone if we get Mad Max.The US dollar has the most reliable track record out there. Don't ever let astrologists and tarot card readers who are gambling addicted cultists praying for a Mad Max Scenario to unfold try to tell you what the future is going to be.
Also derivatives like STRC will also pump the price, since Strategy will buy in proportion to how much they sell (STRC was the largest IPO of 2025 and is almost $4 billion last I checked). For cash balances, there is nothing better than STRC right now and I bet it will double every year for awhile...by 2027 I bet it is close to $10 billion.
Strategy sold 3.4 billion in STRC since the IPO barely 6 months ago ...so not selling in a week proves what exactly?STRC isn't selling. This past week Saylor sold 0.
That number doesn't add up.Strategy sold 3.4 billion in STRC since the IPO barely 6 months ago ...so not selling in a week proves what exactly?
It's amazing this stuff is still said out loud. It's like they can't even do thought experiments comparing particular fiat. It's not that they can't, it's that they won't, which is an interesting and common human dilemma/frailty.It’s the same technology…he has no concept of network effects or decentralization…or what makes one money different from another money.
We've said it a million times, and there is no claim otherwise, it has clear, demonstrable value. In a world of increasing taxes, confiscation, surveillance, etc - you don't see value in BTC? Really? Laughable.3. “No utility.” OK - so an asset that can’t be taken by greedy governments, or ex-wives, and can be transported anywhere and given to anyone I want that can’t be stopped has no utility? Seriously? Not to mention it holds its value into the future?
It's a wonderful time to buy and/or swing trade (1 year or 5-10) MSTR.4. Doesn’t understand MSTR - cash reserves for dividends. That was done to pay lower interest rates and become investment grade…as the lack of a fiat cash reserve cost them a higher credit rating. The goal is to open up larger pools of capital and lower dividend rates. $2 billion in fiat isn’t much when you have 740,000 BTC
That's been the thing I've harped on, and even though I tell people they just put their fingers in their ears. Over and over. Willing ignorance.6. Clearly does not understand the difference between currency and money.
It holds value, among other things (best money = best proxy for time and energy).Given that 95% of Bitcoin has already been mined, and no actual economic value was produced in exchange for any of it (just electricity wasted), why should anyone in the future voluntarily exchange their goods/labor for Bitcoin?
Now the socialist comes out. First it was the God State complex, which is all about the idol (central authority) pumping theirs, and immorally/unfairly to boot.If you were actually interested in fairness and honest value exchange, you would advocate for some sort of distribution mechanism to redistribute Bitcoin out of the hands of whales (where the vast majority of it is currently hoarded) and into the hands of people who would at least theoretically use it for exchange. But literally no one in the Bitcoin space is advocating for this. They're all just trying to pump their bags.
Yup.If you don't value bitcoin @scorpion why should anyone give it to you?
How can you say this with a straight face given Bitcoin's price action over the past year? According to you and chance vought, Bitcoin was supposed to be well over 200k by this point.It holds value, among other things (best money = best proxy for time and energy).
I didn't say that I was advocating for redistribution - I said that anyone who was sincerely advocating for "perfect money" under the guise of fairness would do so. There's absolutely nothing fair about Bitcoin; 95% of it has already been mined and is being hoarded by whales. Anyone advocating for a Bitcoin standard is therefore in favor of having future generations economically enslaved to Bitcoin HODLers and their direct descendants. It's transparently obvious that this is the exact scenario you all fantasize about (and which you think all non-Bitcoin owners actually deserve for our rejection of Bitcoin).Now the socialist comes out. First it was the God State complex, which is all about the idol (central authority) pumping theirs, and immorally/unfairly to boot.
Do a thought experiment for me (we've already done this, this'll just further prove the point): the ascent continues, though you still just focus (conveniently) on volatility. It continues to reach higher highs and higher lows. Is that not increasing and/or holding value?How can you say this with a straight face given Bitcoin's price action over the past year? According to you and chance vought, Bitcoin was supposed to be well over 200k by this point.
You could have bought at $1, $10, $50, $500, $5000, and next week you might be able to buy at $50k. That's not fair?There's absolutely nothing fair about Bitcoin
Why would you feel bad? You don't know that we've seen the dancing on the grave stuff, I don't know, 500 times before?I haven't even bothered posting in this thread in awhile because I felt bad for you guys.
Akchually: 467 times.Why would you feel bad? You don't know that we've seen the dancing on the grave stuff, I don't know, 500 times before?
It's funny you think we care - rather, we know what happens end of this year and next. Dustin' those sandals off stuff.
That number doesn't add up.
If whales are hoarding it, why is it so cheap now?? Seems to me whales are selling.How can you say this with a straight face given Bitcoin's price action over the past year? According to you and chance vought, Bitcoin was supposed to be well over 200k by this point.
As soon as the feudal lords spend their bitcoin, it gets distributed to everyone they pay.Can you guys at least be honest about your fantasy of becoming neo-feudal lords via owning Bitcoin, and stop pretending that you are advocating for some sort of perfectly fair economic system? If you were actually interested in fairness and honest value exchange, you would advocate for some sort of distribution mechanism to redistribute Bitcoin out of the hands of whales (where the vast majority of it is currently hoarded) and into the hands of people who would at least theoretically use it for exchange.