If Ghengis Khan had invented calculus, or if George Soros came up with the internet HTTP protocol....would it matter?The most common theory I read was actually that the words "Satoshi" and "Nakomoto" in Japenese roughly translate to "central intelligence" in English. Thus, there is some belief among "conspiracy theorists" that all crypto is just owned by the CIA and this is one of those hidden in plain sight moves.
Obviously, that doesn't mean that it has to be true or that people haven't been making great money off of crypto. FWIW, this post on Linkedin tries to debunk those claims.
Unmasking Satoshi: Does a 1996 NSA Study Hold the Key to Bitcoin’s Biggest Mystery?
The true meaning or inspiration behind the pseudonym “Satoshi Nakamoto” – the mysterious creator of Bitcoin – has long been a subject of intrigue. One particularly interesting line of speculation is that the name itself contains hidden wordplay or cryptographic clues linking it to a 1996 National Sewww.linkedin.com
If some Jews invented nuclear weapons -- DOES IT MATTER?
The fact that a bunch of Jew scientists came up with the A-bomb, doesn't matter. As a nation, you either have nukes, or you are subjugated by a nation that does. That's it. The creators of the technology are completely irrelevant.
The Byzantine Empire, under Constantine XI, refused to adopt a new technology from a Hungarian engineer named Orban: bronze cannons. Ottoman Sultan Mehmed II accepted and funded those cannons, and Constantinople fell.
Technology exists. It doesn't matter who created it. The fact that it exists is the only thing that matters.
Bitcoin is a fundamental technology, like electricity -- it was first used for motors and electric lights, but it can be used for things that Thomas Edison couldn't dream of -- video calls across the world, and computers that can automatically land airplanes, pinpoint navigation systems that work anywhere in the world, even at the north pole.
Bitcoin is just a tool for humanity, like electricity.
Last edited:
