That leads to the next question, just how many billions of dollars in bitcoin and crypto were lost because the heir couldn’t access the wallet ? Or the person who died while holding btc never made arrangements for an heir to get their crypto?
I see what you are saying about gold, only problem is most people dont actually own gold or trade in gold anymore, in the old days some of the physical money was gold coins, thats not the case anymore and our fiat paper money is not even backed by gold anymore, so our paper and digital fiat money thats printed out of thin air is a far greater bubble and scam than bitcoin in my opinion BUT that is what the world trades with you can buy and sell stuff with fiat money, rocks have also been used as money.Bitcoin is definitely not Gold, whose price is stable and fluctuates within a 20% prince range over a given year. Gold is also indestructible, and anti-fragile. If the power goes out Bitcoin falls to zero. Gold is a true store of value created by God at the start of the Universe. Bitcoin is man-made, and pretty much a vanity project, because it will die like all other man-made projects. Gold by contrast cannot die since it was created by God to be immortal.
However, this does not make Bitcoin worthless.
Bitcoin is really the world's first global stock, and, many people, like Scorpion, fail to appreciate the Greed factor of a global stock. Anyone can buy it, anyone can sell it, all you need is an internet connection. Imagine if everyone could buy or sell on the NYSE, with a simple program, at any time of the day. Block chain is an ultra sophisticated stock exchange, and Bitcoin was the first stock to take advantage of this exchange mechanism, so it's the most popular in virtue of having the first mover advantage.
So what rules Bitcoin is Greed and Fear. Price rises increase the fear of missing out aspect, which encourage people from all over the world to join the casino, and buy some Bitcoin. A stock with no barrier to entry, and global in nature, is in fact truly revolutionary and has never occurred before. As the world's greatest bubble, it is extremely tempting to partake in. Some random guy in China or India can now inflate the price of bitcoin by putting his life savings into "the new Gold" (just marketing). Because so many people can help pump up the price of Bitcoin at once, it gives the appearance of tremendous value, which skyrockets the Greed factor.
Being able to tap into people's Greed is valuable, and that is a huge point BTC detractors miss.
Just remember, Mr. Talmud already owns most of BTC and will crash it once they believe they can profit max it. Like all bubbles it will pop when the big players decide to sell their stock.
BTC is already just another tool for fiat players to manipulate, as it's priced entirely in fiat (whereas Gold has it's own value that exists outside of fiat), so handle with care. It could go up for a long time or it could pop tomorrow. No way to predict what Mr. Talmud will do.
For those who want to ride the BTC wave, be sure to take profits, or you'll be very sorry. At the same time, those who do not participate in the BTC Bubble could be missing out huge, perhaps the greatest scam of the century, a global scam of Biblical proportions. Lots of money to be made.
When BTC does pop, as everything priced in fiat must, it will wipe out so many at once it will probably cause a recession or even depression. In fact, the BTC scam has all of the same markings as did in the stock bubble before the 1920's, people believing that stocks were value when of course it's only speculative trading.
How many tons of gold was lost at sea due to shipwrecks or pirates, there must be tons of gold laying at the bottom of the oceansThat leads to the next question, just how many billions of dollars in bitcoin and crypto were lost because the heir couldn’t access the wallet ? Or the person who died while holding btc never made arrangements for an heir to get their crypto?
Yeah, too bad I also had a boating accident with that hard wallet I used to have.How many tons of gold was lost at sea due to shipwrecks or pirates, there must be tons of gold laying at the bottom of the oceans
Yeah, too bad I also had a boating accident with that hard wallet I used to have.
Yeah, too bad I also had a boating accident with that hard wallet I used to have.
These things happen, just because the conquistadors had a few shipwrecks and lost some gold didnt mean they stopped trading with gold because it was "too risky" they accepted their losses and tried againYeah, too bad I also had a boating accident with that hard wallet I used to have.
Has anyone looked into digital assets and inheritance? As in legal questions? The only reason this could be otherwise useful would be due to step up of basis. It's also curious if it were self custodied if an exchange might have a form that just states that transfer on death occurs, whether anyone can do anything about it or not.
This is a company based in Bermuda that receives your Bitcoin payments and promises to pay your heirs a greater amount of Bitcoin when you die? Given zero legal precedent for this sort of thing, and zero reason to believe that this company will be around in the future, is anyone actually dumb enough to be using this service? Or any of these other weird Bitcoin financial services you promote?Also there is the Bitcoin life insurance angle, which pays out in Bitcoin and is not subject to taxes. A 10 BTC policy pays out 15 BTC, and it can be borrowed against before you die (whole life insurance) with no capital gains tax owed.
Yes that’s definitely a compromise, especially with the life insurance product.This is a company based in Bermuda that receives your Bitcoin payments and promises to pay your heirs a greater amount of Bitcoin when you die? Given zero legal precedent for this sort of thing, and zero reason to believe that this company will be around in the future, is anyone actually dumb enough to be using this service? Or any of these other weird Bitcoin financial services you promote?
Also, the issues surrounding the inheritance of Bitcoin demonstrate some of the problems of immutable blockchain transactions. There is every incentive for fraud and theft, and very few remedies available to rectify it when it occurs. Who can you actually trust to custody your Bitcoin besides yourself, given how high the stakes are? If my entire life savings could be irrevocably stolen from me - with zero recourse - with just a few keystrokes, there's no way I'm trusting ANY third party with that information.
This sounds horribly convoluted, and is still wide open for abuse. The very concept of immutable transactions on the blockchain basically incentivizes bad actors to engage in fraud and theft on a hitherto unprecedented scale, knowing that once they get their hands on the money, the victim has utterly no recourse. The recent invention of ransomware, for example, was only made possible by the use of crypto payments. In a Bitcoin-based economic system, you could expect to see all manner of new crimes. For a particularly gruesome example, anyone who was known to own Bitcoin would be opening themselves up to being targeted by gangs for kidnapping and/or home invasion, with the aim of torturing the victim and their family members until they gave up their Bitcoin keys. This is not far-fetched conjecture, either. This has already happened multiple times.Unchained and Casa use a very robust security feature unique to bitcoin, known as “collaborative custody”. Similar to a safe deposit box, multiple keys are required to open the vault. No one entity, including the bank (casa or unchained) has enough keys to open it. The customer retains enough keys to unilaterally open it though. Also, a neutral third party can custody a backup single key, and collaborate with casa or unchained to unlock the vault. You could add a fourth party that must also collaborate with the other 2.
But they can't do "whatever they want". There are thousands of pages of banking and financial regulations governing the behavior of these institutions, which were slowly developed over centuries to encourage stability and discourage fraud, theft and other malfeasance. And sure, the modern financial system isn't perfect, I'm the first to acknowledge that. I just regard the flaws of Bitcoin as much more serious and worrisome.This is much more secure than traditional banking, where the bank can unilaterally do whatever they want (or what a government tells them to do) with your money.
Do you realize how crazy this sounds to the average person?If these other key holders are in other nations, especially US adversaries like Russia or Iran, there is even more security against a hostile government action against your property (but you also could unilaterally move your bitcoin out of reach using your multiple keys, instantly)
Imagine a safe deposit box but impenetrable…or the dual keys required for an icbm launch. It’s simple.This sounds horribly convoluted, and is still wide open for abuse.
Same as gold or cash…except violence yields nothing with bitcoin. You have no clue how I have it custodied or how much I have. I could have the majority in a time-lock multisig that can’t be moved months or years. There are so many security possibilities your head will spin.The very concept of immutable transactions on the blockchain basically incentivizes bad actors to engage in fraud and theft on a hitherto unprecedented scale, knowing that once they get their hands on the money, the victim has utterly no recourse.
Same with any physical asset, like South African farmers know too well. Bitcoin has ways of preventing theft even under torture - you can keep it in a way that that will yield nothing. I can enter a duress code in a hardware wallet that will wipe everything but a decoy wallet, another that will cause it to glitch out, and one that will brick it.The recent invention of ransomware, for example, was only made possible by the use of crypto payments. In a Bitcoin-based economic system, you could expect to see all manner of new crimes. For a particularly gruesome example, anyone who was known to own Bitcoin would be opening themselves up to being targeted by gangs for kidnapping and/or home invasion, with the aim of torturing the victim and their family members until they gave up their Bitcoin keys. This is not far-fetched conjecture, either. This has already happened multiple times.
Banks have de-banked dozens of people for political reasons. Denying their entire families from accessing banks or credit cards. Andrew Torba, creator of Gab, for the crime of creating a free speech social media platform that respects the first amendment and basic human rights. Dozens of tech founders who supported trump. Thousands of Canadians who donated to the Freedom convoy. Rules and regulations protect the banks and government, not the people.But they can't do "whatever they want". There are thousands of pages of banking and financial regulations governing the behavior of these institutions, which were slowly developed over centuries to encourage stability and discourage fraud, theft and other malfeasance. And sure, the modern financial system isn't perfect, I'm the first to acknowledge that. I just regard the flaws of Bitcoin as much more serious and worrisome.
This is doom and gloom anti-American magical thinking. Pure BTC copium at its finest. I honestly don't know where some of you guys are getting this "America and the US dollar are about to fail and disappear into the ether" crap?...until they feel enough of the government’s boot on their throat...
It's just the beginning.$100,000
It's not for everybody, as you show on every post you make here.Who can you actually trust to custody your Bitcoin besides yourself, given how high the stakes are?
This is embarrassing.But they can't do "whatever they want". There are thousands of pages of banking and financial regulations governing the behavior of these institutions, which were slowly developed over centuries to encourage stability and discourage fraud, theft and other malfeasance. And sure, the modern financial system isn't perfect, I'm the first to acknowledge that. I just regard the flaws of Bitcoin as much more serious and worrisome.