MFTP- What a holier than though hypocrite YOU ARE... I was working remotely the morning both of the Twin Towers were struck by Cross Country 767 Fully Fueled Planes Hijacked in Boston. I keep biz news shows on in the background and saw the First Tower struck alerts and saw the second tower struck live on TV - next you will say this was simulated TV VooDoo animation.
A friend's wife was on one of those two planes flying to meetings for her work in CA. He drove down to NYC to help out in the aftermath and see if he could find out anything about his wife and perhaps begin to deal with his sudden shock and grief. He wound up laying some flowers near where large parts of one of the plane engines were strewn on the City Streets as there was no memorial at the time.
Here are some technical facts for you. Fact his wife was on one of the planes, fact her plane was hijacked and flown into one of the WTC towers. Fact Her plane never landed in California. Fact he never saw his wife ever again. His only consolation is at 600 MPH when her plane disintegrated, and she was vaporized she likely felt no pain and did not see her end coming. He prays for her every day to this very day.
Fact Flat Earther science deniers like you are a clear and present danger to our faith and our country.
Do yourself a favor and never visit Ground Zero Memorials in NYC... Anyone there from Metro NYC will likely know someone who lost a person dear to them. It would not end well for you to shoot off your mouth regarding your fake plane animations theories there.
So real planes hit the towers but not the pentagon? That's one major hole in the entire premise. The footage your establishment used on the day they attacked themselves incriminates them with massive fraud. This can be proven by the impossible flight-path a veteran pilot couldn't have navigated to get there, as well as the absolute lack of any airplane parts from the aircraft they claimed crashed. There are photographs of the pentagon wall before it collapsed. These photos show a small hole and green grass roughly 5 meters in front of it. With all the mass of an airliner being in the engines, how the media ever convinced the masses the plane only made one hole with it's aluminum nose is truly a testament to the stupidity and apathy of the general public and quality CIA brainwashing.
"Pentagon footage: not a plane"
Here there is even footage of a missile inside of a shell of a mock American Airlines fuselage, essentially creating an "airplane missile":
"Missing planes on 9/11"
Plane noses when hit by a bird have to land immediately and can be incredibly dented. What makes people think that a plane can fly through structural steel? This slicing butter stop-motion animation is farcically laughable.
"More undeniable proof there were no planes on 9/11"
Here is another angle that shows no planes whatsoever, so now we have two visual accounts here that contradict what you say you have seen:
"Unedited video showing no planes on 911"
All footage is clearly video editing and composite layering, which would have to use some type of graphical rendering overlay to superimpose an unrealistic airplane into those realistic cuts. If there were airplanes, they were unmanned and piloted remotely, and they did not cause the towers to collapse. I have numerous photos of engine parts and landing gear taken by independent photographers shortly afterwards which means that they were either planted or it was a drone. The video footage tends towards the reality of these parts being planted or already within the towers somewhere before the explosives went off.
Last video with corroborated analysis:
"911 No Planes"
Video description:
"This video displays some video evidence that would tend to reduce the believability of the story of September 11, 2001. The fact that an aluminum and plastic airplane could crash through structural steel is simply unbelievable. Then that jet fuel and office furniture fires could weaken the structure to the point of collapse is laughable. The hottest you would get with these fuel sources in the most perfect conditions would be 1800 degrees Fahrenheit. This is over 1000 degrees short of the melting point of steel. The is not a weakening temperature. Steel that this temperature is quite solid. Then there is WTC 7. A 47 story high rise about 300 feet from the North tower. It was not hit by a plane. It was not significantly impacted by the falling debris of the Twin Towers. It simply had some office fires, yet it "collapsed" at 5:47PM on 9-11. It fell at near free fall speed. To do this, literally every bit of structure that made the building stand, would have to fail at the same time. It takes extremely precise charges and precuts of the support structure to make a building fall in this manner. We are expected to believe that 3 buildings achieved this highly improbable "perfect storm" of conditions to fall straight down into their footprint that day"
As for your this alleged story of your buddy and his dead wife, I believe that respect should be shown to the dead, no matter who they were or wherever they were alleged to have been killed, but we're all anons here, I don't bring personal details into stories except as an anecdote, it never carries any real weight, and neither does this tall tale. Of course New Yorkers are touchy on this subject, and I'm not one to poke at people for amusement, but they are all deceived if they believe the official story.
People go missing all the time in the USA. There is no exact proof what happened to all the alleged people missing who were on the alleged flights that allegedly struck the towers. There certainly are theories out there to them all being kidnapped and killed, as well as theories that none of them were real people to begin with, but the entire operation was planned by the deepest levels of US government intelligence, military brass, along with private contractors, and the mossad. If your friend is real and his wife was real, then she was most likely landed at a remote military airfield and executed along with everyone else in those alleged passenger manifests. Their bodies were dissolved or cremated far from any public or uninitiated witnesses.
Critical and ideologically-opposing inquiries are difficult to manifest in people who have spent so much time in the system, but the truth is you must question and investigate everything and work hard against the programming psychologically written in all of us to resist these thoughts.
The one group that always struck me as diligent in their research for 9/11 were the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. Have you ever seen their research? Here is an interesting theory that seems to be more provable with every new act of aggression the perpetrators commit with this type of technology:
"Assessment of the Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) hypothesis"
https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence...-of-the-directed-energy-weapon-dew-hypothesis
As for the flat earth claim, if you read that thread carefully you will see that I have a different opinion than most on cosmology, and it isn't a reductionist geometric one, but of course this infantile smear tactic follows herd mentality like a plague. This beloved establishment science™ you cherish is heretical, blasphemous, and a clear and present danger to Christendom, and a constant impediment to investigation and pursuit of the truth, which is more important than an immoral Godless country that doesn't exist anymore. If my inquiries make me an enemy of liars then I am satisfied with your reaction and implore you to do more soul-searching despite your decades of earthly experience, and question everything. It's never too late for anyone to free themselves from this soulless system, unless one has performed certain rituals.
As for nuclear weapons, the time is approaching where I believe one side of the argument will be proven wrong for good. Time will tell.
There are less people here who want to keep towing the status quo and the overton window than you believe, some just aren't as politely vocal about it as I am.
