Look around You - this is the troll's lounge. The deepest, darkest corner of the forum at the very bottom of the page. A mod-forsaken place where no one should venture.
36 Chambers Of Fertilizer
- Thread starter Wutang
- Start date
Look around You - this is the troll's lounge. The deepest, darkest corner of the forum at the very bottom of the page. A mod-forsaken place where no one should venture.
Doompillers on suicide watch! Wait, what? lol
I find this gang-up of a thread seriously cringe. This is something Roosh would've nuked off the face of RVF.
Roosh also had a really strict rule against black pilling and probably would have banned you just for criticizing something about the forum, Roosh also abruptly shut his forum down deleted everything and now we're here on Christ is King brother.
If someone is consistently pushing content that is irritating to a good part of the membership and these members want to remark about what they find unappealing about that person's posts, there is nothing wrong with that. If it comes off as "ganging up" then I think the question should be what is it this about this person's posts that is drawing such a large number of negative reactions from a good portion of the membership.
If someone goes into a social gathering and starts going and starts complaining non-stop about his day, starts turning every conversation towards his pet topics (for example, about how voting for Trump won't save you), brags about having millions of dollars (which he humbly reminds everyone isn't really that much), has no idea to read any sort of social cues, would it be "ganging up" on that person if other people at that gathering starts commenting about this person's behavior?
If someone goes into a social gathering and starts going and starts complaining non-stop about his day, starts turning every conversation towards his pet topics (for example, about how voting for Trump won't save you), brags about having millions of dollars (which he humbly reminds everyone isn't really that much), has no idea to read any sort of social cues, would it be "ganging up" on that person if other people at that gathering starts commenting about this person's behavior?
Iakobos
Orthodox
I do miss this, IIMT shoulda been perma'd long ago. Potential conspiracy theory: CIK fat cat admins keeping IIMT around to use ragebait trolling to drive engagement for SEO?
I do miss this, IIMT shoulda been perma'd long ago. Potential conspiracy theory: CIK fat cat admins keeping IIMT around to use ragebait trolling to drive engagement for SEO?
Haha naw our admins are just trying to buck the trend from RVF where you got banned for whichever way the wind blew on the mods current mood swing that day. Mind you we recently had someone call one of our founders a possible pedo for becoming a priest and it took more than that to drop a ban on them, a temporary ban at that.
I don't want to see IIMT banned I just don't quite understand what he thinks he's contributing by constantly spamming the forum with manipulation and doom. I do think there is more to it with him though, more than just someone miserable wants everyone to be miserable with him to make it okay.
The whole thing has just become a drain on the forum, we don't talk about much anymore other than his negative social media slop it seems. Lots of people are unhappy and he knows that, he plays into that.....some go for it because it speaks to them and some don't want to be constantly bombarded with it. It's not like he's the only one that posts negative things or social media slop but unlike others that is ALL he posts.
Last edited:
Meh, if one poster is a single issue doom piller in every single thread.... People are allowed to point that out.
This is a troll thread for a poster who's a troll boy on many issues.
It's formulaic as Wu pointed out (before he peed on The Dude's rug) that it's like binary code here.
The issue is not the supposed gangup, the issue is a user who posts such low quality content and causes petty arguments/slides in nearly every thread he touches (even though most guys on CIK agree with him on his main points the majority of the time), that it warranted creating a thread exclusively for moving those arguments/slides to IN THE TROLL'S LOUNGE.
Multiple reputable forum members have attempted to discuss and understand said user but it is impossible to nail down his actual position on things other than the sky is falling and we are all doomed.
When forced to admit to anything, the user in question hurls accusations and gets supposed support from others unknown members of the forum to prove why his position is correct. Honestly, it is just like arguing with a woman, and that brings up an interesting question as to why this guy will never agree to meet up with other CIK members IRL...
It makes no sense why someone so overwhelmingly successful would be so afraid of other allegedly less successful men.
Yes and yes.
Fine. Tune it out. However, this whole thing could easily be resolved if IIMT would meet @scorpion for lunch. If after said luncheon Scorpion comes back to the forum with, "Guys, we got it all wrong, IIMT is 6'3", jacked, showed me bank receipts totalling 3 million dollars, and the hot 20 year-old waitress wouldn't stop flirting with him and actually asked him for his number... Furthermore, he was actually quite affable and charismatic which I found extremely enchanting," then all would be forgiven, I would apologize profusely, and from therein out I would upvote every one of his cut and paste posts from the guys he listens to and in private, via PM, I would ask him on the daily for his red pilled sage advice on how to stop myself from becoming Chinese fertilizer.
I'm trying to work it out, if you're worth, say, 3.5m at 50 years old, can't you basically live off the interest as a single man? If you've got that sort of money, a reasonable property with no mortgage (how much space does a single man need?), and no wife and kids to look after, a man could live a comfortable lifestyle on his savings. Especially if he's still grinding and getting the big bucks. I'm in the UK, not USA so I'm not certain of how it works over there, but unless you're trying to live like a big baller, that level of wealth should easily be enough to retire on right now. Not to mention that if there's no kids then there's nobody to leave it to, so why not spend it? You could live like a king for the rest of your days. Someone with a better knowledge of finance in the USA can fill me in.
Yes.
Also Google "how much would i get annually if i save 3.5m in the stock market"
Based on common financial planning rules, saving $3.5 million in a diversified stock market portfolio could safely generate approximately $122,500 to $140,000 annually in the first year of retirement, assuming a 3.5% to 4% withdrawal rate. This income can be adjusted upward for inflation in subsequent years.
If you have $3.5 million and withdraw at a 3.5% rate (a safer, conservative approach in current markets), you would receive $122,500 in the first year. If you invest for total return (dividends plus growth), your portfolio has a high likelihood of lasting for 30+ years.
Plus you have social security you'll receive.
There isn't much to work out, it's not real it is manipulation in order to get people to buy into him and it works on some people. He has changed his personal narrative more times than I care to count and he makes up stories for effect and dramatization to shape it. He realized nobody wants to listen to a miserable cubicle dweller with no friends complaining about how much he hates his life so he then turned himself into happy and successful with people fawning all over him, he also started added Christian ideology buzzwords to his posts after he took a beating for dismissing prayer and the church. I could go on, it makes his messaging more appealing to the those he tries to patronize and it works he pounces whenever he sees someone may be amicable to him, why he is doing it here on Christ is King and won't stop is what none of us can pin down....
Last edited: