Conspiracy Theory Thread



Whoa…
Evelyn de Rothschild and David Rockefeller named in Elite Mind-Control Training and S*x-Trafficking Operation of Underaged Children
• she claims a billionaire who went to the 1972 Bilderberg Meeting, trained her to be a s*x-slave…
—— she originally did not want to say this persons name, but Patrick, in an emotional exchange got the name David Rockefeller from her being the billionaire
• David Rockefeller, according to her, answered to Evelyn de Rothschild and made decisions about young girls for the purpose of spying and blackmailing people



 
Really poor interview from PBD, who is usually quite good. He just seemed so unprepared or not willing to tackle how serious this topic is. Understandably getting roasted in the comments.

Yes, 95% of the the comments on his youtube channels (many of whom are fans of his) are critical of the poor way he interviewed her.
But, bad interview or not.... the fact simple this topic is getting more attention might be good in the long run.

Many members here have been discussing this topic for over 8 years starting with the wikileaks disclosures in the month before the 2016 election.
 
Yes, 95% of the the comments on his youtube channels (many of whom are fans of his) are critical of the poor way he interviewed her.
But, bad interview or not.... the fact simple this topic is getting more attention might be good in the long run.

Many members here have been discussing this topic for over 8 years starting with the wikileaks disclosures in the month before the 2016 election.

Yeah I agree about the attention and I'm thankful PBD is giving this topic great exposure, but I still expected a better interview.
Especially as he goes on to say in the same interview how this topic means so much to him as a father.
This interview just seemed a little off, when it was the one interview that needed to go the other direction.

I'm probably reading too much into it. It's such a f**ked up topic feels weird even judging an interview really. Messed up world we're living in.
 
Yeah I agree about the attention and I'm thankful PBD is giving this topic great exposure, but I still expected a better interview.
Especially as he goes on to say in the same interview how this topic means so much to him as a father.
This interview just seemed a little off, when it was the one interview that needed to go the other direction.

I'm probably reading too much into it. It's such a f**ked up topic feels weird even judging an interview really. Messed up world we're living in.
Yes. The people objecting to this kind of thing are just people that don't want to believe this is going on. What are the odds that we've all been talking about it for years AND it's a blackmail operation, things that go on on a global level, as well as in DC, Hollywood, etc. Of course it's true. It's not a theory, it's a reality - sadly.
 
Really poor interview from PBD, who is usually quite good. He just seemed so unprepared or not willing to tackle how serious this topic is. Understandably getting roasted in the comments.

He's not a psychologist remember that. Brave woman btw, I know some ladies who just lock up.
 
PBD is the classic purple-pilled online media, edgy enough to dip his toes into thorny subjects like this one, but gatekeeps hard in his treatment of said subjects - see his Dan Bilzerian interview.
 
The left will protest and start a humanitarian crisis psyop when the mass deportation plans begin. They’ll go back to the George Floyd playbook and make videos go viral of ICE agents ‘brutally’ deporting, injuring, or killing illegals, ignoring any aggression or threats from violent illegals themselves. A ‘saint’ will emerge as the poster child of this ‘crisis’ and the brutality of Trump’s ‘authoritarian’ regime. The alphabet agencies will be complicit.

They will threaten local PDs in blue states and force good cops to quit, stacking the deck with their corrupt own.

Any escalation with use of the National Guard or the military will be portrayed in the media as the US becoming a police state and analogies with Putin, Hitler, or another dictator.
 
Any escalation with use of the National Guard or the military will be portrayed in the media as the US becoming a police state and analogies with Putin, Hitler, or another dictator.
To be honest with you, I don't think this matters anymore. The "media" is in tatters and lashing out.

I can't say what will happen in 4-5 years but the main power players are washed up and on their back heels.
 
To be honest with you, I don't think this matters anymore. The "media" is in tatters and lashing out.

I can't say what will happen in 4-5 years but the main power players are washed up and on their back heels.

Comparing Trump (or any Republican) to an authoritarian doesn’t have an effect anymore, but having the military deployed on the streets of major cities is terrible optics.
 
"On the End Times and the Antichrist"

The below post envisions a scenario of the End Times and the Antichrist based on historical trends and psychological incentives toward ever-increasing centralization and control:

https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/on-the-end-times-and-the-antichrist
I read it. It's quite good, especially from a secular point of view, even though I don't agree with all of the details.

It is interesting that centralization may be rebounding back to smaller nation states having as much power as bigger ones, given that technology and money/power are FAR more important now than size and masses of people. Andreesen talks about this in the recent Rogan interview. Also, Naval had mentioned that same point, which is that drones or automatic planes will now rule the day, not humans (on the ground or even in the air) fighting any longer.
 


Ges7_drWAAA6fma

Ge207iobEAAQFoO.jpeg

H.R. 8610

The single subject of this legislation is:
To reauthorize and reform counter-unmanned aircraft system
authorities, to improve transparency, security, safety, and
accountability related to such authorities, and for other
purposes.
 

I read they have been seen flying less than 400 above ground. That's easily within range of a rifle. I would think a higher caliber rifle would be needed to bring down a large drone.

Shooting a big gun in a developed area is likely to attract the cops, I'd think. Heck, maybe they'd be in favor of trying to bring it down and see what it is!

Edit: if you shoot down one of these car-sized drones, it would be very likely to hit a building or a car when it crashes. That's kind of risky!
 
Here's a couple more links regarding the drone issue. Ross Coulthart is a long time investigative journalist but in the last few years he's going down the UFO rabbit hole and meeting some very interesting people. He's well worth a watch.

The second video is Ryan Graves former F-18 Pilot who had encounters with UAPs - who mentions in the interview this has been happening regulary over the last few years at this time of year.

I've been following this for quite a while and think there's a lot of truth out there but a lot of misinformation. There is for sure a level of dishonesty that is so obvious to the general public it's quite unreal. I have a bunch of other things I want to say but typing them out makes me sound like a lunatic, so i'll keep them private. ;)





 
Back
Top