The parliamentarian who's appointed, and can be dismissed, by the Senate majority leader.
GOP Thread
- Thread starter Rainy
- Start date
The parliamentarian who's appointed, and can be dismissed, by the Senate majority leader.
It's a good question why they kept the current parliamentarian. She's a Democrat, but she was also strict with her own party and blocked many proposals during Biden's term. I think they kept her so they could look unbiased. If they toss her out now after her ruling, then it creates backlash. I think the idea is to let her run out her term and then replace her with a Republican who will then get to serve in the next Democrat administration.
This seems to be a bad strategy, but they needed to replace her back in January to keep the illusion of impartiality. They won't do it now. At the end of the day, even the stuff she ruled against (like healthcare for illegals) isn't as big of a deal if we can deport them. There's also the chance to repeal those things in the future without going scorched earth with the Democrats.
For what it worth, the Senate does keep some kind of "bipartisanship" going, and the 60 vote rule holds across administrations. I don't like it, but it also has some value in stopping the excesses that happen during a Democrat term. It also plays into the long game: if Republicans can get 60 votes then it will become mandated and much harder to repeal than a mere 50 Democrat votes in a following term.
The problem, of course, is that voters have no long term thinking and are easily discouraged. If they don't get what they want immediately in 2 years, they'll stay home and Democrats will get in. However voters are fools, because they ensure Republicans will not want to get rid of the 60 vote rule since their voters are unreliable.
It's a vicious cycle and I see no way to break it unless Republican voters actually stop being babies and have strong turnout 100% of the time.
This is the reason the satanic elites have a conservative party in the west. People get frustrated that their healthcare is unaffordable and their countries are falling apart, so you bring out the clowns to point the finger at the imaginary bad guy. It isn't the ghetto hoodrats and third world immigrants sucking the system dry, according to the "conservatives" it is this made up demographic who "needs to work harder".
Stop importing cheap labor from 3rd world countries, and they'll find jobs with ease.
Baker (R) wants to primary Congressman Randy Fine, who was gloating about Gaza kids starving.
floridapolitics.com
Marjorie Taylor Greene rips Randy Fine’s ‘starve away’ statement about Gaza
'A Jewish U.S. Representative calling for the continued starvation of innocent people and children is disgraceful.'
floridapolitics.com
Obviously, our vote doesn't count and now you can see how the game is played. One side gets to spend like a drunken sailor on their own special interests, the other side pretends to be "fiscally conservative" while fighting endless wars and giving Israeli's free healthcare and college, and illegal aliens welfare. And now people can see through it.
Shaquilleoatmeal
Protestant
It is very believable. For the left wing you just need an anti-White non-White to run for office, blaming everything on Whites and the Police and Racism. For the right wing it is tougher. You represent much smarter people, who are rightfully fed up, so you have to find people who are happy to lie to these people in exchange for something. The 90 IQ leftoid politician just believes their nonsense. The 110 IQ rightoid politician has to be a degenerate you can blackmail and bribe.
Mind the source.
This is an important point that seems to be repeatedly overlooked by some guys when posting evidence to support their POV. A related discussion about checking the believability of evidence:
Continued from here to separate the topics: https://christisking.cc/threads/the-epstein-docs.614/post-103300
Have you, the reader, noticed this as well?
Again,
And again,
And again...
All over the web, people continue to rely on questionable evidence as "proof", including images and videos which turn out to be manipulated. This also goes for countless supposed screenshots, images of Tweets, audio of political interviews, videos of war, etc.
This is counter-productive to the...
Have you, the reader, noticed this as well?
Again,
And again,
And again...
All over the web, people continue to rely on questionable evidence as "proof", including images and videos which turn out to be manipulated. This also goes for countless supposed screenshots, images of Tweets, audio of political interviews, videos of war, etc.
This is counter-productive to the...
The bio of the confused dude who published the stats on their 'who's making news' site (link in the reddit post) ->
The confused dude is all about downplaying tranny insanity by scraping media articles that suit his agenda.
"The bad guys are actually conservatives and church leaders, not trannies. This is the truth about reality. The data don't lie."
You can't avoid Jews when money is involved, wherever there's some action they're there. A friend read a book maybe a decade ago, which talked about how they went even to ancient India. The world's reserve currency has always been where most of their bankers were, I found some chart online- see below. Judah Benjamin held various high level posts in the Confederate government, Jews were slave and commodity traders, Lehman Bros. started out in Alabama.
Like Steady Hands,
Some sick old dude, a pervert calling himself Kristen is the official "owner" and face of this possibly DNC run website
How many democrats among the 4205 offenders whose professions are 'not listed', or out of the 2363 'others'?
There are 539 teachers, probably nearly all Democrats, and only 89 politicians in total- 67.4% of them Republicans, among all the 10885 perpetrators listed. I guess they went for some ready for action teenagers below 18, while most of the Dems are actual pedos, who abuse little children. Podesta is free as a bird.
Sharp as a ****ing cue ball