Hitler versus Rothschild: the Logistics and Background of World War Two

[JR5]

Hitler's Top Guy

This post examines the post-World War 2 life of Walloon leader and super-soldier Leon Degrelle, seen by many as the likely successor to Hitler. It seeks to answer this question: how did Degrelle maintain his relentless optimism and idealism for decades when ongoing developments regularly proved disappointing to him personally and to his cause? Was his perspective appropriate?

“What weighs upon one in exile is neither loneliness (this is often, to the contrary, a wonderful blessing) nor the bitterness of defeat, but rather it is that feeling of impotence, being unable to project all the forces that roar inside of one and to convince others born to transmit these forces as I was born to carry them. This is the torture of every day, every hour; that nothing happens.” - Leon Degrelle to a young comrade, November 11, 1961

https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/hitlers-top-guy

 

[Australia Sucks]

Even junkfood back then was so much better quality then now. The original Fanta in Germany was sweetened with Beet juice and in Netherlands it was sweetened with elderberry juice. Today American Fanta uses high fructose corn syrup.

 

[It_Is_My_Time]

 

[Острог]

Fixed that for ya.

By the way, plenty of leaders went up against insane odds yet came out on top. Those are the ones blessed by God, such as Constantine the Great. Those were intelligent men. God never knew Hitler.

Going by this failed logic you might also state that God never knew Nicolas II or Duke Alexandrovich. You don't know that.

 

[Samseau]

Going by this failed logic you might also state that God never knew Nicolas II or Duke Alexandrovich. You don't know that.

Failed logic? Alexandrovich had millions of roubles go "missing" under his command, and was completely ineffective to create a navy for Russia. Meanwhile Nicolas went to war against other Christians instead of focusing on the Talmudic threat in his midst. Both of these men were corrupt (Alexandrovich much more though) and were punished in their own lifetimes for their errors let alone what their punishments in the next life might be.

Godly men live Godly lives and even if they fail it is evident in their acts that they were trying to achieve Godly outcomes. The two men you mentioned did nothing to work towards Godly outcomes, their policies and actions were disasters.

 

[It_Is_My_Time]

Failed logic? Alexandrovich had millions of roubles go "missing" under his command, and was completely ineffective to create a navy for Russia. Meanwhile Nicolas went to war against other Christians instead of focusing on the Talmudic threat in his midst. Both of these men were corrupt (Alexandrovich much more though) and were punished in their own lifetimes for their errors let alone what their punishments in the next life might be.

Godly men live Godly lives and even if they fail it is evident in their acts that they were trying to achieve Godly outcomes. The two men you mentioned did nothing to work towards Godly outcomes, their policies and actions were disasters.

Other than Hitler/European Fascists, maybe you can tip a hat to the post revolution Iranian regime and their proxies in the Middle East and maybe give some credit to the Xi Jinping regime, that might be a stretch, can you name anyone with power in the world who has stood up to the satanic elites in the last 400 years?

Even our own founding fathers bent a knee for them, were Masons, and thought they could work hand in hand with them. I can't name anyone other than these factions above who have even tried to put up a resistance to their satanic ways. That puts Hitler and the other European fascists who volunteered to fight on the side of National Socialism in extreme rare company.

Granted, them going unchallenged for so long offers a lot more possibilities in finding someone both brave and close to Christ, but over the last 400 years, I can't think of anyone else, putting Hitler in both very rare company and huge shoes to attempt to fill.

 

[Samseau]

Other than Hitler/European Fascists, maybe you can tip a hat to the post revolution Iranian regime and their proxies in the Middle East and maybe give some credit to the Xi Jinping regime, that might be a stretch, can you name anyone with power in the world who has stood up to the satanic elites in the last 400 years?

Even our own founding fathers bent a knee for them, were Masons, and thought they could work hand in hand with them. I can't name anyone other than these factions above who have even tried to put up a resistance to their satanic ways. That puts Hitler and the other European fascists who volunteered to fight on the side of National Socialism in extreme rare company.

Granted, them going unchallenged for so long offers a lot more possibilities in finding someone both brave and close to Christ, but over the last 400 years, I can't think of anyone else, putting Hitler in both very rare company and huge shoes to attempt to fill.

Andrew Jackson, who stopped the (((bankers))).

Abraham Lincoln, who dismantled the Talmudic slave trade that stretched back to the Khazarian times. After defeating the Jewish controlled South he got a bullet in the head for his efforts, also making him a martyr for righteousness.

I'm sure there are many others, some Tsars among them, but this is too off-topic a tangent from the thread.

 

[It_Is_My_Time]

Andrew Jackson, who stopped the (((bankers))).

Abraham Lincoln, who dismantled the Talmudic slave trade that stretched back to the Khazarian times. After defeating the Jewish controlled South he got a bullet in the head for his efforts, also making him a martyr for righteousness.

I'm sure there are many others, some Tsars among them, but this is too off-topic a tangent from the thread.

You could give them both a nod, neither were successful though either, and neither did the damage or the narrative change that Hitler pushed. Granted, Hitler had the advantage of being on film and his speeches recorded, but he did it at such a grander scale, he is the hottest topic on this subject. I wouldn't say Jackson nor Lincoln were not on the side of God, even if they were unsuccessful in their attempt as well. I would say all three were steppingstones, were sacrifices, so that more and more across the globe became aware of this serious problem. It will take a large portion of the world waking up and being willing to fight this satanic evil to put a stop to it, and with each step, the numbers of people who are aware grows.

 

[Острог]

Failed logic? Alexandrovich had millions of roubles go "missing" under his command, and was completely ineffective to create a navy for Russia. Meanwhile Nicolas went to war against other Christians instead of focusing on the Talmudic threat in his midst. Both of these men were corrupt (Alexandrovich much more though) and were punished in their own lifetimes for their errors let alone what their punishments in the next life might be.

Godly men live Godly lives and even if they fail it is evident in their acts that they were trying to achieve Godly outcomes. The two men you mentioned did nothing to work towards Godly outcomes, their policies and actions were disasters.

Thank God Pete Quinones and dr. Johnson are reading 200 years together to prove you wrong.

The very fact that Nicolas II was murdered in a satanic ritual makes him an Orthodox saint. One day he will be canonized.

 

[Marcus2022]

Samseau, not to target you but now I feel compelled to also respond. Your posts tend to hold some weight although a person is left wondering if it's worth believing in what's being said. It's fine to sit in the peanut gallery and take pot shots at men in history far greater than yourself. I say out of concern which cannot be conveyed in writing: do you think it's time to speak to your priest about pride? There is an air of yourself being Orthodox and an administrator making you privy to a higher understanding. I also urge men seeking Orthodoxy through Roosh to tread cautiously and ensure you're doing this for a relationship with God. Roosh suffered from going against the establishment and we don't know if this reason was his main reason for choosing Orthodoxy and quickly, it was only a handful of years, turning men towards it, to alleviate past sins (as he is a man too), before disappearing from the stage. Maybe let it sink in: the "winning" is the satanic power behind the lust to control the world's money illusion, and allow banks the monopoly to pull money out of their asses and make the masses repay it while enriching themselves by debt (let's take England and London as an example as much banking gravitates there, and they love to lord it over other nations, all while wielding the debt based banking system) - that has left roughly 150 million+ (directly or indirectly) dead in the last 140 years. This is not winning; with or without Hitler, with or without, was it 6 or 7 American Presidents killed for going against it?, or Nicolas, it's about the march of monstrous soulless industrialized control none of us can comprehend, at any cost, by any method, no honor, stab in the back, no God, crawl in the filth and Everest size pile of bodies (souls) to reach the goal. I'm sure all I'll hear is how it's everyone else's fault for trying to push back against it or most importantly have a belief system that doesn't allow it to continue.

 

[magoo]

Don´t know how accurate the Romanov netflix movie was. But the slaughter of Romanov innocent children is something only savage godless heathen worthless jews/commies could have done. One thing is the father. He was a complete retard (according to the movie). But children have no fault whatsoever. They are not in the political game. And should have been set free:

 

[RedLagoon]

Don´t know how accurate the Romanov netflix movie was. But the slaughter of Romanov innocent children is something only savage godless heathen worthless jews/commies could have done. One thing is the father. He was a complete retard (according to the movie). But children have no fault whatsoever. They are not in the political game. And should have been set free:

He was a complete retard in that (((Netflix series))). But we know how the Bolsheviks and their off spring in the middle east go to work re children.

 

[NSOE]

Don´t know how accurate the Romanov netflix movie was. But the slaughter of Romanov innocent children is something only savage godless heathen worthless jews/commies could have done. One thing is the father. He was a complete retard (according to the movie). But children have no fault whatsoever. They are not in the political game. And should have been set free:

I've been meaning to reply to Music here for weeks since before Easter, not that I'm that busy, I just don't feel like writing a long comment, but I'll get to it one of these days. Since the Tsar was mentioned, here is the story as related by a Polish contemporary who saw some action during the Revolution, the whole book is a short and fun read where he takes a look into the Russian soul (so many seem to be infatuated with, certainly not me- ever) and its spiritual state.

Death of the Romanovs and the Mystical Movement

MONARCHIST circles strenuously uphold the rumour that the Tsar and his heir have been saved from a bolshevik prison. But this is a purely political speculation and an apocryphal legend. The evidence collected during Kolchak's rule by Sir George Elliot and a special Commission of Inquiry, my conversations in Omsk with the imprisoned soldiers who were present at the execution of the Imperial family, and my meeting with the brother of the actual executioner, Yurkovski, at Tientsin, have dispelled all doubts I ever had as to the execution of the whole family of the Tsar.

I may venture on a slight digression from my immediate subject in order to quote Yurkovski's story, which completely corroborated all that the soldiers confessed who had guarded the Tsar's prison, and were arrested by Kolchak in Yekaterinburg.

"Moscow sent the order to liquidate the Romanovs," related Yurkovski to me, "but this had to be managed in such a way as to throw the whole responsibility on the local Yekaterinburg Soviet, which was to keep up the appearance of acting independently, and passing the sentence upon the Tsar's family on their own account The arrangement of the whole affair was left to my brother. He visited the volunteer detachment of the Third International and announced that the local Cheka passed sentence of death on the Tsar and his family, and that on this very day the volunteers could take vengeance on the Tsar for the sufferings of the people. But the volunteers remained silent, and not one amongst them was willing to do the deed. In short, the same scene was repeated as that which took place when the Moscow Soviet desired to have the Tsar executed in Tobolsk. Thereupon my brother, taking with him a number of Letts and Hungarians, went to the Ipatiev house, turned into a prison for the Tsar's family, and informed the Tsar that, together with his wife and children, he was to be transferred without delay to the cellars of the building. The Tsar received the news with indifference, but his family were terrified; they burst into tears, cries, and prayers. My brother succeeded in calming them by saying that the garrison of Yekaterinburg had mutinied, and demanded the death of the Romanovs; that the Soviet had refused the demand, and to save the lives of the prisoners, had decided to lodge them in the cellar. The Empress and her daughters quickly composed themselves and thanked my brother, pressing his hand in gratitude. When the Imperial prisoners were in the cellar, they were informed of their doom, and my brother immediately gave the command to fire. But not one of the soldiers dared to obey. Thereupon my brother pulled out his pistol and shot the Tsar. There followed a disordered fusilade, after which only the Empress remained alive. Mortally wounded, she lifted herself from the floor, caught hold of a pillow from the bed, and, hiding behind it, burst into a terrible scream. The only Russian soldier among the Letts and Magyars finished her off by driving his bayonet through the pillow into her bosom. At daybreak the bodies were cut to pieces, transported Into the woods, drenched with petrol and burnt"

This was the story related to me by the brother of Yurkovski, a member of the Yekaterinburg College of the "Cheka," and the murderer of the Imperial family.

It is amazing that in spite of such conclusive evidence of the death of the Romanovs, there still thrives in Monarchist circles the mystical belief that the last of the Tsars has been saved, that he still troubles his heart over the fate of his country, firmly believing in the conversion of his "beloved people," which meantime has concentrated all its energies upon the annihilation of civilisation and all moral values, of Holy Russia itself. The land of the Tsars has since a few years become a geographical expression, a no-man's land, peopled by a mob of anarchists who are destroying even the poor remnants of their intelligence, their culture, their title to the very name of Man.

The Shadow of the Gloomy East - Wikisource, the free online library

en.wikisource.org

 

[NSOE]

Corrected link to the chapter from the above post Death of the Romanovs and the Mystical Movement

 

[Samseau]

Samseau, not to target you but now I feel compelled to also respond. Your posts tend to hold some weight although a person is left wondering if it's worth believing in what's being said. It's fine to sit in the peanut gallery and take pot shots at men in history far greater than yourself.

You have it completely backwards and show a severe confusion. Most world leaders commonly thought of as "great" weren't great at all, but abominations, as Christ taught. Please read Luke 16: https://biblehub.com/luke/16-15.htm (and also the cross references)

"For what is highly esteemed among men is an abomination in the sight of God."

The examples we should hold in high esteem are found here: https://www.monasticrepublic.com/en/orthodox-synaxarion?l=A

I say out of concern which cannot be conveyed in writing: do you think it's time to speak to your priest about pride?

I've probably had more confessions in one year than you've had in your life, you are an inquirer?

There is an air of yourself being Orthodox and an administrator making you privy to a higher understanding. I also urge men seeking Orthodoxy through Roosh to tread cautiously and ensure you're doing this for a relationship with God. Roosh suffered from going against the establishment and we don't know if this reason was his main reason for choosing Orthodoxy and quickly, it was only a handful of years, turning men towards it, to alleviate past sins (as he is a man too), before disappearing from the stage.

He found God and realized he needed to work on himself more than be an example unto others.

Maybe let it sink in: the "winning" is the satanic power behind the lust to control the world's money illusion, and allow banks the monopoly to pull money out of their asses and make the masses repay it while enriching themselves by debt (let's take England and London as an example as much banking gravitates there, and they love to lord it over other nations, all while wielding the debt based banking system) - that has left roughly 150 million+ (directly or indirectly) dead in the last 140 years. This is not winning; with or without Hitler, with or without, was it 6 or 7 American Presidents killed for going against it?, or Nicolas, it's about the march of monstrous soulless industrialized control none of us can comprehend, at any cost, by any method, no honor, stab in the back, no God, crawl in the filth and Everest size pile of bodies (souls) to reach the goal. I'm sure all I'll hear is how it's everyone else's fault for trying to push back against it or most importantly have a belief system that doesn't allow it to continue.

Not sure what your point is, however, the fact that Talmudic Jews are so powerful today indicates most of the leaders preceding us were abject failures, there can be no other conclusion. Pretty much the only institution to have any long term historical success in keeping out Talmudism from the public is Orthodoxy, which is why the Church must be the central focus for any future civilization. Without such a pillar all efforts are wasted, as the foundation will be sand.

 

[Samseau]

Just remembered another example of how Hitler was an evil failure. Hitler occupied Greece for absolutely no reason, which delayed his invasion of the USSR and caused his troops to be exposed to the great winter that year to wipe out the first force of Barbarossa.

Hitler had no reason to order an occupation of Greece. The Greeks willingly gave up all of their Talmuds, the Greeks hated them as the Serphadic Jews who settled there since fleeing from Spain worked with the Turks to oppress the Greeks. The Greeks actually built on top of the tombstones of the Talmuds when constructing the University of Thessaloniki:

Aristotle University of Thessaloniki - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The university was built on top of the remains of what had once been the Jewish cemetery in Thessaloniki, until the cemetery's destruction during the Nazi occupation. Gravestones from the Jewish cemetery were used as building materials in the construction of the university.

To this day, Greece ranks in the Top 20 of most Antisemitic countries (a badge of honor): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitism_by_country#Antisemitism_rates_by_nation

So, you'd think Hitler and the Nazis would have found natural allies with Greece, yet Hitler rejected all attempts at peace and decided to dominate Greece anyways:

The Greek leader, General Metaxas, did not particularly want British forces on the mainland of Greece as he feared it would lead to a German invasion of his country and during the winter of 1940–41 secretly asked Hitler if he was willing to mediate an end to the Italo-Greek war.

There is no conclusion to reach other than Hitler being a terrible and idiotic leader, a vainglorious man obsessed with his image and honor, which prevented him from realizing his true objectives during the war that would have lead to the defeat of the Talmudic Jews.

 

[Острог]

Just remembered another example of how Hitler was an evil failure. Hitler occupied Greece for absolutely no reason, which delayed his invasion of the USSR and caused his troops to be exposed to the great winter that year to wipe out the first force of Barbarossa.

Hitler had no reason to order an occupation of Greece. The Greeks willingly gave up all of their Talmuds, the Greeks hated them as the Serphadic Jews who settled there since fleeing from Spain worked with the Turks to oppress the Greeks. The Greeks actually built on top of the tombstones of the Talmuds when constructing the University of Thessaloniki:

Aristotle University of Thessaloniki - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

To this day, Greece ranks in the Top 20 of most Antisemitic countries (a badge of honor): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitism_by_country#Antisemitism_rates_by_nation

So, you'd think Hitler and the Nazis would have found natural allies with Greece, yet Hitler rejected all attempts at peace and decided to dominate Greece anyways:



There is no conclusion to reach other than Hitler being a terrible and idiotic leader, a vainglorious man obsessed with his image and honor, which prevented him from realizing his true objectives during the war that would have lead to the defeat of the Talmudic Jews.

Again, dr. Johnson comes in to correct your discrepancies. You clearly have an agenda my friend and not that of truth.

The Orthodox Nationalist: Mussolini's Humiliation in the Greco-Italian War – TON 072419

Dr Matthew Raphael Johnson takes a look at Mussolini through the eyes of a revisionist historian and finds him to be more of a hindrance than a help to the Axis powers.

www.radioalbion.com

additionally:

The Orthodox Nationalist: Ioannis Metaxas and the Greek Corporate State – TON 040418

Talk radio for the Nationalist community.

www.radioalbion.com

The Orthodox Nationalist: Greek Nationalism from Metaxas to Papadoupolos - TON 082323

Talk radio for the Nationalist community.

www.radioalbion.com

 

[Samseau]

Again, dr. Johnson comes in to correct your discrepancies. You clearly have an agenda my friend and not that of truth.

The Orthodox Nationalist: Mussolini's Humiliation in the Greco-Italian War – TON 072419

Dr Matthew Raphael Johnson takes a look at Mussolini through the eyes of a revisionist historian and finds him to be more of a hindrance than a help to the Axis powers.

www.radioalbion.com

additionally:

The Orthodox Nationalist: Ioannis Metaxas and the Greek Corporate State – TON 040418

Talk radio for the Nationalist community.

www.radioalbion.com

The Orthodox Nationalist: Greek Nationalism from Metaxas to Papadoupolos - TON 082323

Talk radio for the Nationalist community.

www.radioalbion.com

Right from your own source;

Italy mounted two mass invasions of Greece, the first in late October 1940 and the second, in March of 1941. Both were defeated in the most humiliating way possible. Hitler was forced to reluctantly invade Greece with the Bulgarians and after losing many good men, finally took Crete after letting the Greeks negotiate an honorable surrender. Hitler showed Greece the greatest respect. He called Mussolini a "Mad little clown."

How can the author assert such nonsense without any explanation?

Hitler wasn't forced to do anything. He should have left Mussolini out to dry, it was yet another blunder for Hitler. Just like he kept his alliance with Japan, even though Japan was completely worthless.

 

[Острог]

The explanation is in the podcast, duh, which you haven't listened to and sorry Samsu but I'd take dr. Johnson's point of view over yours any day of the week.

 

[Samseau]

The explanation is in the podcast, duh, which you haven't listened to and sorry Samsu but I'd take dr. Johnson's point of view over yours any day of the week.

Sure it is, which is why you've not presented it nor is it presented anywhere in the description.

"Just listen to my 30/60/120 min podcast brah, then you'll know!"

Btw the podcast link doesn't work for me, I'm using brave, and not interested in switching browsers.