You're talking about a slightly different topic that is a minor point. You can look at many of the men from high school all the way to age 40 something and they literally look 20 years older than many people the same age these days. Pictures are pictures, and they are objective. Guys bald in the 70s looking 40+ at age 25, Wilford Brimley, etc. we've literally shown the examples. I don't know where you get some of this stuff sometimes.
By the way, I'm not saying any of this really matters. I also think there are far more people now, so those in really bad shape look bad and are closer to obese, and the ones in good shape are phenomenally better looking, especially men, who are objective better looking. That doesn't mean they are more "manly" though, which is a comment on the society and hypergamy in general. As for women, one might be able to easily write it off to many changes, but particularly in makeup. You're not really ever going to defeat father time as a woman unless makeup advances surge, and they have (the window will always be 16-24, and you can't fool men's eyes or the b test).
You just can't help yourself can you?
So people don't go bald young anymore or something? We've got an entire thread around here somewhere that says that isn't true. What are you even rambling about? You're talking about things that are completely subjective as if they're blanket facts. Wilford Brimley "literally" was 40+ in the 70's smart guy.
Last edited: