Nick Fuentes Thread

[Read_Lives_of_Saints]

When I see how the false moral outrage of the left, which most whites truly believe in: egalitarianism, anti-racism, feminism, etc., energizes these people and takes them to such places that when their children are raped and/or murdered, they feel the need to praise the rapists/murderers, I wonder how this will play out.

I don't think those whites are going down without a fight either, so I doubt there will ever be a confrontation unless and until leaders on our side are properly supported with money and institutions, which is a chicken and egg riddle of how you get one without the other.

Here's an example I wrote about just now in the Aussie thread. A white man who appears to be high can not resist the urge to physically attack a larger and more healthy, handsome and hygenic white man who is a nationalist. The white guy below in the white cap getting slammed just tried to steal the larger man's microphone.


View attachment angloslam.mp4

 

[It_Is_My_Time]

Nick is correct. JD Vance was created in a lab, much like Trump was by Roy Cohn, all with the goal of making sure White identity politics never come through the GOP. Tucker is allowed large platforms, because at the end of the day, he pushes back against White identity politics. We can see the end game, any criticism of the structure is allowed, any view point is allowed, as long as it is not White identity.

 

[Shaquilleoatmeal]

 

[It_Is_My_Time]

Nick ratios the fraud VP, who was created in a lab by satanic Peter Theil.

 

[Get2choppaaa]

Nick ratios the fraud VP, who was created in a lab by satanic Peter Theil.

How is that a ratio. Ratio means a post receives significantly more replies and quote tweets than likes

Vances post has 3500 likes and 120 quotes.

That's the opposite of a ratio dingle berry.

 

[It_Is_My_Time]

How is that a ratio. Ratio means a post receives significantly more replies and quote tweets than likes

Vances post has 3500 likes and 120 quotes.

That's the opposite of a ratio dingle berry.

LOL, how many likes does Nick's post have?

 

[Get2choppaaa]

LOL, how many likes does Nick's post have?

25 k. But I'm not seeing how this equates to a ratio.

I'm surprised there are only 25k sycophants / bots reposting or liking Nick.

What JD said is perfectly reasonable.

You can not like a governments policy and not be against the people.

I mean you seem to support Iran saying death to America and don't imply they're racists....

 

[Daniel_J]

I always thought a "ratio" had to do with the view count vs like count of a tweet as compared to the view count vs like count of a reply tweet. In this case JD's original tweet has ~825K views and ~4.6K likes, versus Nicks reply which has ~623K views and 28K likes. Less views than the original but 7 times the amount of likes.

I agree with JD's tweet though.

 

[Get2choppaaa]

I always thought a "ratio" had to do with the view count vs like count of a tweet as compared to the view count vs like count of a reply tweet. In this case JD's original tweet has ~825K views and ~4.6K likes, versus Nicks reply which has ~623K views and 28K likes. Less views than the original but 7 times the amount of likes.

I agree with JD's tweet though.

From ze googles::::

Key Aspects of a Ratio:
Disproportionate Engagement: A tweet with 10 likes but 100 replies is "ratioed," showing negative community sentiment.
Indicates Disagreement: It implies most people engaging with the post disagree with its content, as they're choosing to respond critically rather than endorse it.
A Form of Insult: Being "ratioed" is often seen as humiliating or a public shaming for a bad take.
The "Ratio" Comment: Users often reply with the single word "ratio" to add to the count, amplifying the original poster's embarrassment.
Variations: A "coward's ratio" might be more likes than retweets but few replies, suggesting people agree but fear sharing; a strong reply getting more likes than the original post is also a ratio.

 

[Shaquilleoatmeal]

How is that a ratio. Ratio means a post receives significantly more replies and quote tweets than likes

Vances post has 3500 likes and 120 quotes.

That's the opposite of a ratio dingle berry.

LOL, how many likes does Nick's post have?

I always thought a "ratio" had to do with the view count vs like count of a tweet as compared to the view count vs like count of a reply tweet. In this case JD's original tweet has ~825K views and ~4.6K likes, versus Nicks reply which has ~623K views and 28K likes. Less views than the original but 7 times the amount of likes.

I agree with JD's tweet though.

I wish that JD Vance would say ‘my wife came from a shithole country, which doesn’t mean she is a shit person, but she needs to let go of her national pride based on her ancestors being from a shithole.’

But of course that’s “beyond the pale” and would “jeopardize his marriage”, which just shows how fucked the marriage system is.

 

[Get2choppaaa]

View attachment 26240

Who is this mister baldea you quote?

I wish that JD Vance would say ‘my wife came from a shithole country, which doesn’t mean she is a shit person, but she needs to let go of her national pride based on her ancestors being from a shithole.’

But of course that’s “beyond the pale” and would “jeopardize his marriage”, which just shows how fucked the marriage system is.

Or he could just not want to publicly make disparaging comments about his wife and any of her beliefs.

By this comment I have to assume your are not married?

 

[Shaquilleoatmeal]

Who is this mister baldea you quote?

It was just some Reddit quote based on a quick google search

“Ratio” seems to be internet slang without a clear cut definition

Or he could just not want to publicly make disparaging comments about his wife and any of her beliefs.

It’s not about his wife, it’s about India.

Are you of the belief that JD Vance calling India a shithole is an implicit insult to it’s people and thus his wife?

By this comment I have to assume your are not married?

irrelevant.

 

[Get2choppaaa]

It was just some Reddit quote based on a quick google search

“Ratio” seems to be internet slang without a clear cut definition

Does it? Because that's not the understanding I have and I quoted the ai summary which in this case seems to correctly amalgamate the common accepted term.

Regardless it's more telling that it's only 27k Likes or whatever for Fuentes bot farm.

It’s not about his wife, it’s about India.

Are you of the belief that JD Vance calling India a shithole is an implicit insult to it’s people and thus his wife?

Publicly calling out my wife is a sure fire way to invite outside gossip into my marriage.

irrelevant.

Not true. Always consider the source when evaluating the merit of the content.

 

[Shaquilleoatmeal]

Publicly calling out my wife is a sure fire way to invite outside gossip into my marriage.

Ok, so perhaps let me rephrase:

“India is a shithole”

Then if a reporter asks about his wife, put in the other part.

Is that better?

Not true. Always consider the source when evaluating the merit of the content.

So if the response was that I’m married, you would believe, or did you make up your mind before asking?

 

[Get2choppaaa]

Ok, so perhaps let me rephrase:

“India is a shithole”

He could say that. But it's not necessary. Only dolts don't know that.

Then if a reporter asks about his wife, put in the other part.

Is that better?

So if the response was that I’m married, you would believe, or did you make up your mind before asking?

Based on your comment I can only assume you're not married.

The reason I assume that is because no one who's married would entertain making a negative comment about their wife or inviting negative commentary about their marriage.

If so that's fine, and you're using hyperbole.... Which is also fine.

 

[Shaquilleoatmeal]

He could say that. But it's not necessary. Only dolts don't know that.

Well I kinda think calling out India is a big deal.

Based on your comment I can only assume you're not married.

The reason I assume that is because no one who's married would entertain making a negative comment about their wife or inviting negative commentary about their marriage.

If so that's fine, and you're using hyperbole.... Which is also fine.

Ok fine it was hyperbolic. He should evade mentioning his wife.

 

[Giordano Bruno]

Nick ratios the fraud VP, who was created in a lab by satanic Peter Theil.

The VP is absolutely right.

Today proved it.

You people don't like Israel, but you're all cowards too scared to commit to real anti-semitism.

If Trump did what was necessary, not a single one of you would be brave enough to support him.

 

[Shaquilleoatmeal]

The VP is absolutely right.

Today proved it.

You people don't like Israel, but you're all cowards too scared to commit to real anti-semitism.

If Trump did what was necessary, not a single one of you would be brave enough to support him.

I do but the mods on this forum would call it “fedbait.”

 

[Giordano Bruno]

I do but the mods on this forum would call it “fedbait.”

You don't even need to commit violence.

God is gentler than you can imagine.

But I think if you can't even back Donald Trump in insulting a Jewish man who was an enemy of his, and who Trump would be in a position to know if any of the suspicions we have about Jews continuing their 2000 year old habit of demonic child sacrifice, rape and torture, is guilty of.

Then I have to call that Sanctimony.

Because if you won't even trust your own elected leader, if you'll judge him of all people before you judge yourselves, well. Would you judge God too? Would you judge Jesus too and not put faith in him that he is doing the right thing?

Where does this lack of faith end?

Yeah, it's good to have a devils advocate, it's good to discuss people's faults no matter who they are.

But if you won't back your own side against the enemy, how the heck are you lot complaining that most of the government and most of the republicans are cowards that aren't doing enough?

 

[Northern Pilgrim]

What some of you guys from overseas don't seem to get is that there are *a few* topics in the US that are considered very very rude/disrespectful/taboo across basically all of American society, minus maybe like ghetto gangbangers and some other fringe groups. It's just considered poor taste and ignorant, by folks on both sides of the aisle, basically any decent sort of a person up to just short of an actual autist.

#1 Saying insulting things about a recently deceased person in public/from a public platform.
Regardless of what or how you feel/think about them because of the American views on life and death, the value placed on each individual human life, and a certain sense of decorum.

#2 Openly going after someone's spouse or kids, especially if they are not making themselves available/part of public discourse. Being an edgelord is fine if you want to clickbait and get disenfranchised young men to chuckle and share your post. Where it doesn't work is if you want to be part of the greater conversation and be taken seriously.

I know there's others but those two are pertinent to this thread and the discussion at hand.


Regarding Vance's kids, if they all marry whites and raise their kids Catholic, is Nick going to hold this against them and rant about how they are this or that? Also, why does Nick think it's fine to go after other people's families online and then whine when someone brings up his folks??


There seems to be a bit of a divide in America (and also somewhat on this forum) about whether someone's spiritual condition or ethnic origin is more important. I would argue the former is several orders of magnitude more critical, especially for anyone posting on Christ is King forum.