Just curious.. because I don't follow these threads from day to day. Do you agree or disagree about what IIMT says about Trump?
36 Chambers Of Fertilizer
- Thread starter Wutang
- Start date
It's pretty obvious that any time IIMT mentions God or Christ it's only windrow dressing for him to tailor his posts to appeal to the culture of this forum and that his interests are primarily political. Pretty much every everything he writes could easily be something that comes from the pagan/secular/Nieztchean dissident right only he'll remember to throw in some reference to God on top of it to make it seem Christian in some way. Note that for him the phrase of 'Christ is King' has nothing to do with salvation, being saved, being forgiven of sins, following the teachings in the Gospel or anything of the like. Instead according to "his truth" it's a purely secular political program. Look at his posting history and you'll see that he basically has no interest in Christianity and rather his interests are 100% political and cultural. At best Christianity to him can serve as a base for his actual interest. To him Christianity is an instrument that could or could not be useful for his program rather then being something that has its own purpose.
I'll say it's pretty much the same with his use of the word 'satanic'. It's basically being used as a synonym for 'bad' rather then having any sort of theological meaning.
I'll say it's pretty much the same with his use of the word 'satanic'. It's basically being used as a synonym for 'bad' rather then having any sort of theological meaning.
I really don't care about how he or anyone else feels about trump to be honest trump can kick rocks along with every other politician the only good thing I'll say about trump was that he was subjectively better than the other guy. I'm realistic about the situation and I always have been which is why I never had some vendetta against trump because I relied on him to fulfill all my hopes and dreams, which of course he didn't and never will, like others hoped he would do for them and then couldn't handle it. What I care about is my brothers in Christ which is why I am here on this forum. But regardless I've already answered that for him, scroll a few posts up #175....
Last edited:
This is unfortunately true but IIMT is not the only one. In fact, this is probably true for a large section of the forum. People still have a politics first, Christ in a distant second mindset.
Spot on and not just second to politics but any other topic that is drawing their ire that day, the longer it goes unchecked the more brazen it has become, some don't even bother to hide it anymore. I have more respect for some of the guys with agnostic tags, at least they are not using Christianity as a front and I'll be the first one to tell you that I need to be a better Catholic myself.
I have probably 10 times.
Right now, if China took over another third world country by force, the collective effort of NATO would at a minimum make it very expensive for China. NATO is still White enough to be a threat to China, even if they cannot beat China, they can at least make it painful. Whereas if China waits 30 years and their technology advances, and the west turns into the third world, conquering the rest of the globe will be much easier for them.
NATO isn't in charge of protecting third world countries. They are in charge of protecting other members of NATO and you don't see countries such as India or Nigeria or whatever as part of NATO. This is super basic stuff that you don't need to listen to 3 hour hour podcasts to me know. As of now NATO doesn't even have the will to stop Russia from entering Ukraine which is a country right at their door step so how willing are the going to stop China from invading whatever third world country they want? According to your reasoning, China should have already invaded India, Nepal, Cambodia, Bengal, etc
If you don't even realize basic facts such as how NATO works how do you expect to convince people to come to your side or look to you for guidance? Every time you post one of our schizo theories about geopolitics or daily living or get a basic fact wrong you further undermine your own credibility. Why should people listen to you or the people on 'your side' if it's going to lead them to thinking like you and not be able to grasp the basic facts of what's going on in the world?
If you don't even realize basic facts such as how NATO works how do you expect to convince people to come to your side or look to you for guidance? Every time you post one of our schizo theories about geopolitics or daily living or get a basic fact wrong you further undermine your own credibility. Why should people listen to you or the people on 'your side' if it's going to lead them to thinking like you and not be able to grasp the basic facts of what's going on in the world?
He had a Chinese roommate for 10 years. And so what does this tell us? It tells us that It Is My Time is a fake nationalist race traitor against white America who actively subsidizes white replacement by splitting the bills with Chicoms so that they can afford to invade our universities and housing markets. It also tells us that IIMT is a fearful neurotic jew who does not like change and values money over personal space and privacy. In other words, he is not part of the solution, but the actual problem. Can you imagine living with another man in the same apartment for 10 years? Who does this?
Just another chink in his armor.
I did have several roommates in my late 20s/early 30s living in an expensive city, it allowed me to save up for my first home.
"NATO" is a generic term for "the west". If China were to take Vietnam, the west would get involved and make it very painful on China.
Just like the west wasting resources all around the globe attacking China and Russian interests and proxies.
If you honestly think the west can import third world people, and replace the men who created the west, and still keep pace with China and Russia, the you live in a dream world. Do you support third world immigration into the west?
Reagan and his third world invasion is the reason we are in this mess. If you think removing some regulations, which will never be allowed by the people who really run this country today, is going to reverse the trend of population replacement, you are in for a rude awakening. If you replace hard working, intelligent, noble 100 IQ people with 85 IQ scam artists, you get a country that will resemble countries run by 85 IQ scam artists.
The amount of money I saved and was able to reinvest was insane. I was able to take advantage of the last good days of the USA, and I don't take that for granted at all.
Why would the west defend Vietnam when they aren't even willing to fight in Ukraine which is right at their door step?
I agree third world immigration is weakening the west. What I don't agree with is your insistence that this will lead to a Chinese occupation since countries that aren't merely importing the third world but ARE the third world are not at risk of invasion. Your contention is that a country with too little white people will fall to the Chinese and the Chinese will definitely take their countries yet these countries which are composed of 95+ % are at no risk of Chinese invasion.
If you are going to go back to saying it's because at the present moment the west will fight to oppose the Chinese then I'll point out again how Europeans aren't even willing to fight to defend Ukraine and how many of them aren't even willing to fight to defend their own countries from mass migration. Given all of these conditions your "the strong will always take the land" law means these Chinese conquests should have happened already.
You also have post after post about how the US military is already in shambles and behind Chinese technology and is unable to stand up the Chinese. In your own posts you have already indicated that in your view the gap between China and the west is already big enough where the west can't really put up resistance. European military are even weaker the the US military so they wouldn't be able to stand up to China either. By your own reasoning, the scenario that you claim will happen is 30 years is already here. Yet there is no signs of Chinese world conquest coming.
What are you talking about? We are sinking our economy and sending billions to Ukraine to perpetuate a war that is only being pushed to attack Russia and Russian interests. We spend trillions a year around the globe just to mess with China and Russia. So, if China attacked another country, we would send trillions more to mercenaries to attack them. Our entire economy is destroyed because of fighting these battles, and that is without China directly engaging someone.
China will be very wise and wait until the west has committed suicide. Time is on their side. Putin even talks about the demographic issue of the west and the damage it is doing. The west grows massively weaker with third world immigration and China just keeps advancing at a reasonable pace, and is aided by their growing list of allies.
Reagan did an amnesty to anti communists right wing immigrants. It was a mistake. But people were already inside US. And i believe he criminalized hiring illegals.
Reagan won. He was a winner. He would wipe the floor with commies.
The way you been writing you seem to have been implying that the west (Or NATO as you said initially) would actually fight to defend against Chinese invasion of random third world countries. Now you are back tracking and saying you are just talking about aid. This is a common issue with you, you'll make some crazy out of this world claim and then when challenged you'll back off when you realize you can't defend your position. "Tel Aviv won't exist - oh well it still only exists because the Iranians are being honorable and backing off" "NATO will defend Vietnam against a Chinese invasion - oh I meant to say the west when I said NATO" " China isn't taking the land of third world nations because white people will fight back - uh by fighting back really meant they'll send big aid packages"
Also a weird part of your logic: China is waiting for the west to become more third world before they attack to take the land since strong countries will take over weak countries yet they won't attack countries that are already third world. There's counties that are already in the sort of condition that you claim the west will be in a few decades yet there's no indications China is building up for an invasion of these countries. Even if we grant your crazy premises to be true and follow your own logic it still doesn't lead to the results you claim are inevitable.
Also to reiterate, the way you have been writing on this forum implies that the west is already too weak to resist China. See your many posts about collapse economies of the west and how Israel/US has already lost to Iran (a country that is way weaker than China) and how Western technology is already ruined from H1B1 engineers and how China has already lapped the US on the technology race.
Reagan was just another puppet and as time moves forward, it is evident what a complete fraud he was. And the "days of Reagan" will never come back with a whole new demographic.
We already fight the Chinese. We spent trillions around the globe attacking Chinese interests economically and via proxy wars.
Are you just not aware of this? Are you in favor of third world immigration into the west? You work so hard to prove a point that most here are already aware is not accurate.
All this talk about Vietnam is triggering repressed memories of my youth. Please provide trigger warnings.
Last edited:
More strange IIMT tier logic: if you don't agree with his strange Sinophile theory of the supreme Han Chinese conquering the glove it somehow means you support third world immigration to the West. For third parties reading this, please note this as an example of mind exhibiting patterns of thought that is typically associated with schizophrenia: seeing strange obscure connections between things that have no actual connection with each other.
Also another example of grandoise IIMT claims getting shrunk down to something more plain when he is confronted: a world war between China and the west that he is claiming is going to happen or is about to happen is now and will result in whole countries being reduced to fertilizer is downgraded to 'well we spend money to mess with them!" If this is the all "NATO" can do to oppose the Chinese doesn't this mean they already are unable to resist the Chinese and therefore we should already see them taking the lands of weaker countries?
As for "You work so hard to prove a point that most here are already aware is not accurate." That applies to you since most of the responses of other posters here about your posts about how China will invade Ireland eventually is them expressing bafflement and asking you to explain how it's supposed to happen and asking for reasons for why it's going to happen with the only reason you can come up with 'the strong country will take the land of weaker countries' which I have shown isn't actually happening.
Last edited: