Charlie Kirk Thread

Flynn chimes in.



"Charlie Kirk was assassinated only a few weeks back, and the American people are still being kept in the dark.

There are too many unanswered questions, and the official story doesn’t hold water. We’re told a 22-year-old acted alone, a “lone wolf” who somehow managed to compose a flawless text, handle a weapon with expert precision, and carry out the attack without any help or oversight. I’ve spoken with people who know what they’re talking about, snipers, ballistics experts, weapons specialists, and analysts who’ve reviewed the footage firsthand. Every one of them points to inconsistencies that cannot be ignored.

History has shown us, especially in the turbulent 1960s, that assassinations are rarely isolated or straightforward. The more profound truths often hide in the shadows, protected by those who benefit from the confusion.

Until we get complete transparency and real answers from those in power, the questions will not go away, and neither will the people demanding the truth."
 
Not a bad hypothesis from Owen Benjamin.


This guy has occasional good takes but has way too big an ego for not knowing as much as he should on topics. This one is not that good, because it's just not simple/parsimony/Occam's razor. Untrained people who hate him turn on him, and those are already linked with the default setting of assassinations, the people who are good at it and have a history of it? meh
 
^Right, that's kind of a silly hypothesis, the TPUSA people don't have the skills or motivation to go as far as to pull together that kind of an assassination.

However, they might have every motivation to keep their mouth shut, disavow any alternative theories to the official narrative, and keep taking the ((money)).
 
Last edited:
This guy has occasional good takes but has way too big an ego for not knowing as much as he should on topics. This one is not that good, because it's just not simple/parsimony/Occam's razor. Untrained people who hate him turn on him, and those are already linked with the default setting of assassinations, the people who are good at it and have a history of it? meh
What would be a better theory is that Israel/Mossad did it because why not, fairly high profile guy, and a figure of the right. They do that in order to later assassinate a lefty figure that is prominent, and try to get the US into a worse distraction/civil war while Israel continues to receive global criticism and disgust.
 
My guess/speculation is there are accomplices inside TPUSA. But they didn´t have the logistics to organize the hit. That was Mossad/Israel. At best a more rogue agressive faction inside Mossad. And I might be wrong but I would give the patsy a 5/10 chance of being acquitted or dying in jail. The timestamps on the fake messages will be one important factor to look for.

Trump just came to say it was Antifa. So yeah Israel is involved for sure.

 
Last edited:
^Right, that's kind of a silly hypothesis, the TPUSA people don't have the skills or motivation to go as far as to pull together that kind of an assassination.

However, they might have every motivation to keep their mouth shut, disavow any alternative theories to the official narrative, and keep taking the ((money)).
Forget their supposed skill set. They have strong ties to the GOP, one of the two organizations that have held a lock on the most powerful government in history for more than a century. The only consideration for the GOP on this call lies in whether Kirk proved more valuable dead than alive. With the latest donor drama the upper echelon at TPUSA had the motive to cooperate.
 
This guy has occasional good takes but has way too big an ego for not knowing as much as he should on topics. This one is not that good, because it's just not simple/parsimony/Occam's razor.

I agree on his ego. Ego and pride is always a downfall. But I will hereby state (and will probably elsewhere) that I reject Occam and his razor.
 
Back
Top