Nick Fuentes Thread
- Thread starter MusicForThePiano
- Start date
Exactly sums up what I've been saying about Nick being an attention seeking insecure closet homosexual
Hard to deny this after his recent outburst. He's at best an attention seeking prima dona, and at worst, pretty compromised.
Was there a recent event? I am unfamiliar.
I just thought he was a queer since he pushed an old lady down the stairs then claimed to be Mexican when the cops talked to him.
His saying getting married is gay was the other sign.
He went beyond saying getting married being gay. I recall he actually said having sex with a woman is gay. I realize that the Groyper-sphere is all about irony and the zoomer skibidi toliet brainrot humor but the fact he even thought about making that joke had my radar going.
For a time he was claiming to be "asexual", something usually only seen in autistic women.
Who knows and who cares at this point. He is trapped by the ego, need for clicks, and other attention seeking that is part of an online persona in order to make money as an opiner/influence/debater/commentator. It runs with the territory as I've said many times. It's almost not fair to act like it doesn't happen to nearly all the big talking heads. It's part of the game, quite literally, and is the cost for such an "easy" life, though they'll never admit it, as they act like making videos and having opinions is "hard work." Financial types do this too, btw.
If we're honest, few men even among the modern group, given this population boom and the dysgenics with it, are capable of really making change. Very few. The rest will just be part of the crisis movement, for better or worse.
If we're honest, few men even among the modern group, given this population boom and the dysgenics with it, are capable of really making change. Very few. The rest will just be part of the crisis movement, for better or worse.
Well in any case, when taking advice from people you should only follow it if they embody the things you are seeking.
With the exception of someone saying "don't make the same mistakes I did" it's useless to listen to people pontificate on things when they themselves are not the Exemplar of what the audience is striving for.
Of course the vast majority of men want kids and a wife and family. Very few want to remain single.
Tucker accurately captured the point.
Nick serves to poison pill any other right wing commentary by exposing negatives regardless.
Shaquilleoatmeal
Protestant
Shaquilleoatmeal
Protestant
Where did he say being married was gay? Evidence needed.
Maybe. But Nick brings up some good points with regards to Tucker. Nick isn't the one who's father was CIA, who went to a 50K a year private high school, who was raised in wealth and privilege, who was a Democrat, who worked for CNN, and then made 20 million dollars flip flopping at FOX, and is now funded by Peter Thiel. Tucker isn't the one being debanked and banned from every major platform, and he only started talking about the jews and Israel a year ago because The Noticing reached such a crescendo and became unavoidable (but he still isn't saying the word "jew" in a negative light).
A case could be made that anybody who gets paid to provide "commentary" (i.e. talk) for a living nowadays is a JQ shill or at bare minimum an ineffective attention whore. With new developments in AI and surveillance technology elites can now get to anyone, anywhere, anytime (which is why it is important to stay off their radar) and (((they))) own every inch of the internet, media, and the world's communication networks. And so if you are "allowed" to speak on one of their networks at this point in history it is either by design (i.e. with their blessing and permission) or because (((they))) believe you to be inconsequential and ineffective at shifting The Overton Window, much less fomenting a revolution against the jew controlled state.
Legit gatekeeper defends Nick Fuentes. I don't care that Asmongold is a gatekeeper, seems like a nice guy to me, but since gatekeeping is the greatest threat to our democracy I want to know why isn't he being attacked? So if you support Nick Fuentes it's okay to gatekeep? Asmangold has the most kosher hot takes I've ever heard from someone young, and he's choosing to be political with a large audience. I want you to spill the tea on Asmangold, I want the receipts, bring the screenshots, do the deep dives, give me a little slap ass, please bro. I need these people exposed. You don't understand, democracy is at stake. Please.
Tucker has been pretty consistent in pointing out Israel and BiBis abuse of the system and our government.
Nick is a trust fund Baby himself in case you we're unaware... So let's not get on the pity party.
Not sure this statement actually says anything. We have who we have in the public space and there are tons of voices out there.
Tucker has exposed tons of things that have shifted the overton window in the correct direction...between Mersheimer, Larry Sinclair, ECT ECT he's had tons of folks on that are the antithesis of controlled oppo.
Fuentes is an obvious homosexual or at least displays a very high level of homosexual tendencies, and there's a difference between being an attention seeking fag and someone whose commenting on current events. Nick is the guy everyone beat up and stuck in a locker in high school... And it shows.
People frequently miss the point of what's being talked about here. You can agree with magoo here and still say it doesn't effectively matter, because the issue ultimately is the one no one is talking about (yet) just like they waited this long to "talk about the jews". What is that issue? Women. Men see no incentive in the west to deal with women, whether it's women's fault, their behavior combined with propaganda they ate up, how old they are, what they want/don't want, etc. It doesn't matter, because unless you change women and their behavior, collapse is baked in. That's the point, in fact, of this forum or the preceding one for 10-20 years. What does one do about it, or not do about it, and do you actually control it or are you just making others aware so that slowly something might change?
Yes, Urkel is accurate here. The issue is that, vis a vis the point above, things happen slowly because one has to touch each topic with wisdom and over time, just like the demon elites do things slowly, decade by decade and women wake up acting like they don't know what happened when they hit 30+ and can't "find a man." Would it have been wise for Tucker to go scorched earth years ago? Probably not. The point is that you do need some cover to slowly bring up important topics over time, and Nick did his part in making this known throughout the internet, and his sacrifice is just part of the larger scheme. But to act like he was anything but a smaller player, however important, in turning the opinion is to be fairly clueless as to how things change. His thing is to make men aware and actually cause the change by making them aware that the only change actually is them checking out, finding God, etc. For heaven's sakes we can barely bet boomer Orthodox priests to acknowledge why men are coming in the church and women aren't, and be honest about just how bad the current girl or woman acts and moves through maturity. It isn't pretty, and they don't bring it up, so of course nothing changes until crisis comes. And it's coming.
InspCallahan
Catholic
Didn't see this posted?
I watched about the first 15 mins. Not sure to the degree Nick really had any zingers.
Because Tucker said on the Sean Ryan shoe in June 2024 his dad was in the CIA then said he didn't know until after he died (March 2025)...tucker now can't be trusted at all.... That's about all I could get out of listening to him and I don't know it's a significant gotcha.
I'm pretty sure I could reasonably infer Tucker using a bit of hyperbole here and it not really changing his critique of Fuentes.
Again, the question is , " is Nick a fed controlled asset who's purpose is to discredit other populists or not"
The answer is overwhelmingly clear YES.