Why Does a Feminist Society Accept/Promote Porn-slop?

How many people would actually pay for porn, that they actually want to watch it that badly.
I think it would be very small, attested to by the fact that (I'm sure everyone has thought of this) there is so much free garbage out there, many wonder, "Who the heck are these guys that are paying for XYZ or OF?" It makes no sense, unless you realize that it's just a type of psyop or control thing. A lot of it is inherent with the chaos of leftism, this brand of course a media one with much j control.
 
Given that women tend to be treated like whores in porn-slop, eGirls are called thots by many of their coomers, there is a consistent theme of rape in the porn-slop industry, Reddit is full of coomer haunts like "dead eye girls" and "ruined sluts" - why does a society that is riddled with feminism and anti-male sentiment accept and promote porn-slop?

Consultation material:



Though a categorisation error here. This guy is marked as a scholar, but he is actually a teacher.

Im guessing because they enjoying watching the porn engaging with it so why would they be against something they using?
 
Because the same satanic elites who push feminism, own the porn industry. Most women, even feminists, one on one see porn as disgusting. Probably mostly because it is competition for male attention, but regardless it is not something they like. But the feminists have no power, their leaders tell them it is part of "freedom" and they must accept it and keep quiet about it.

Just like when Palestinian protestors organize in the west, there are pro-Israel thought leaders of these protests who ensure the message remains "Israel are White supremacist colonizers" and never point the finger at who is actually committing these crimes and how they bribe/blackmail or politicians. So, you end up with really stupid leftist comments like "Israel are the real Nazis".
 
don't use racial slurs
The question posed by OP seems to be why there no ideological opposition to pornography from the left. I don’t understand why so many replies are discussing ZOG. There’s several reasons.

First of all there is a huge contradiction when it comes to pornography. Feminism/leftism believes that a woman is empowered by having shameless sex equivalent to the, presumed, shameless sex a man experiences. It’s a human right/equality issue [lol]. It’s kind of funny when we recall how some forum members keep stressing that male and female promiscuity should be held to different standards. Correct, that’s exactly what they’re fighting against, your point of view. So for someone to campaign against pornography would be to admit that women will always be “taken advantage of” or equivalent when having sex, regardless of anything else, like their free will.

Then we have to realize that “everyone” loves pornography. Masturbation is considered a biological function, as does sex, and it’s considered a victimless crime. Leftist ideology preaches the whole privacy of “bedroom rights” thing and pornography falls under that.

There are many women that are against pornography. I’m sure there are feminists too but they see the writing on the wall. Jerking off is not a topic you want to bring up to a woman. There’s also the fact that women masturbate too and certain percentage of them watch pornography.

So pornography is a perfect example of a situation where people immediately feel this is a hill they don’t want to die on.

As to how our [deleted] overlords feel about it is beyond the scope of the discussion and has been answered already.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The question posed by OP seems to be why there no ideological opposition to pornography from the left. I don’t understand why so many replies are discussing ZOG. There’s several reasons.

First of all there is a huge contradiction when it comes to pornography. Feminism/leftism believes that a woman is empowered by having shameless sex equivalent to the, presumed, shameless sex a man experiences. It’s a human right/equality issue [lol]. It’s kind of funny when we recall how some forum members keep stressing that male and female promiscuity should be held to different standards. Correct, that’s exactly what they’re fighting against, your point of view. So for someone to campaign against pornography would be to admit that women will always be “taken advantage of” or equivalent when having sex, regardless of anything else, like their free will.

Then we have to realize that “everyone” loves pornography. Masturbation is considered a biological function, as does sex, and it’s considered a victimless crime. Leftist ideology preaches the whole privacy of “bedroom rights” thing and pornography falls under that.

There are many women that are against pornography. I’m sure there are feminists too but they see the writing on the wall. Jerking off is not a topic you want to bring up to a woman. There’s also the fact that women masturbate too and certain percentage of them watch pornography.

So pornography is a perfect example of a situation where people immediately feel this is a hill they don’t want to die on.

As to how our kike overlords feel about it is beyond the scope of the discussion and has been answered already.

And let's not forget the "health benefits" of masturbation as proposed by the SCIENCE.
All the atheists love THE SCIENCE so of course they will think pornography is actually healthy.
The underlying battle of our time is how science is attempting to remove God although the low IQ take is that they are somehow separate.
 
And let's not forget the "health benefits" of masturbation as proposed by the SCIENCE.
All the atheists love THE SCIENCE so of course they will think pornography is actually healthy.
The underlying battle of our time is how science is attempting to remove God although the low IQ take is that they are somehow separate.
my usual rebuttal when an atheist comes at me making some balderdash claim and assigning "modern science" as the source of its veracity is to remind him that this very "modern science" tells me I can become a woman just by putting on a dress and shifting pronouns around
 
It’s kind of funny when we recall how some forum members keep stressing that male and female promiscuity should be held to different standards. Correct, that’s exactly what they’re fighting against, your point of view.
Yes, thank you for again proving our point. If you reason by extreme it also shows how much more damaging sex can be to women and all those potentially associated with her, including children.
 
Yes, thank you for again proving our point. If you reason by extreme it also shows how much more damaging sex can be to women and all those potentially associated with her, including children.
You didn’t understand the point. I’m not condemning it. When a man and a woman have sex the results are different.

The point is a lot of redpillers reframe known knowledge as if we’re doing some kind of groundbreaking research. This is very evident with these talk channels where they bring on whores and debate them about whoring. It’s actually crazy how much we’ve degenerated.

This is not really a timeline but it gives you an idea of what’s happening.
  1. A woman’s chastity was always valued.
  2. Women said it’s not fair how men can have sex but women get judged for it.
  3. Casual sex became more common place.
  4. Men began to agree with women, saying it is kind of strange how we’re trying to get laid on Friday night but the women are considered whores. Both parties should be free to have sex with their partners or prospects.
  5. This liberalization of opinion has been exploited where a lot of women and other actors have been pushing for even further liberalization such as “prostitution is okay”, “being a cuck is a kink”.
So basically we live in a society where most people, including a lot of people on Reddit are still in step 4. They want to have sex and they yield that since it’s okay for them, then it’s okay for women.

This is actually a war of opinion. As long as women can shame others for calling them whores then it will actually be considered okay. So at the end of the day there is no DEBATE. We have people who want to live one way and we people who want to live another way. Both parties understand what the other is trying to achieve and are trying to interfere.

So when we have a redpiller saying it’s different. It’s like okay. I agree. It’s not an original thought but I agree. So what’s your point? Do you want go back to step 2 above or do you want to recreate a chaste society?

I want a chaste society, I don’t care what the consequences are for which gender.
 
Back
Top