Was Hitler right to try and genocide Jews?

Was he right?

  • Yes, they are pests and any innocent is mere collateral damage.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    3
Status
Not open for further replies.
This has been reported four times and has been moved to the Troll's Lounge, until S or S have decided what to do with it.
 
Genocide is obviously wrong and has been established as such in Genesis 18 more than 6K years ago. You aren't posting this thread in good faith nor is there any reason to trust you. This thread seems designed for someone else to view, but I suppose you could just be a really angry guy who needs to cool down. Either way it's all unloving behavior so have yourself a 5 point ban.
 
Also I just want to make the point just because x is bad it doesn't not necessarily follow that the opposite of x (lets call it y) must be good. Something can be bad and the opposite of that can also be bad. So if a person believes that Jews are bad it does not follow necessarily that Hitler must be good for wanting to kill them. Hitler did a lot of wrong things. Not to mention he was also very perverted (there is sufficient evidence of his bisexuality and many sexual perversions out there)
 
Something can be bad and the opposite of that can also be bad. So if a person believes that Jews are bad it does not follow necessarily that Hitler must be good for wanting to kill them. Hitler did a lot of wrong things. Not to mention he was also very perverted (there is sufficient evidence of his bisexuality and many sexual perversions out there)
This is the worst example you could use here. It falls down when you say "bisexuality". Perverted is different from frequenting gay bars. Don't accuse him of the latter.

Hitler was in Weimar. This is the real redpill on this and the thread topic. Jews were almost all of the juries and all that, while native Germans were using the worthless money as a substitute for coal. Weimar stemmed from an already Jewish government type made to punish Germany after WW1. It makes Biden's cabinet and Hollywood look like 1939 Germany in comparison. And you know who else was behind the absolutely deranged degeneracies of Weimar?
 
It never happened. It is baffling that there are people here who still believe this nonsense.

For those new to this forum viewing this garbage idea of a thread, there is no written or legal NSDAP document anywhere ordering the extermination of jews in Europe. All of the "confessions" at Nuremberg were achieved by heinous torture, including crushing the testicles of the prisoners beyond repair. Plus there was about a 30 year gap between the end of the war and the beginning of Holocaustianity, if something was so real and pernicious they would not have waited so long to begin their con. It is the biggest racket of the 20th century and it is the raison d'être for the continuing destruction of all the white and European nations by every vector of culture war poison. It has gotten to the point where you cannot express anything positive about your own race or nation without fear of being called a knotsee. And it also is a lie they are using to clamp down on churches that still retain old school values. The jewish agenda is attempting to portray any honest old school Christian, whether Catholic or Orthodox, as a type of boogeyman that represents a way of life that has been erroneously painted to be similar to their fictional National Socialist German nightmare. They already nearly destroyed my beloved Church with Vatican II, a direct result of judeo-masonic communist pressure to gut the Catholic Church for the alleged crime of their "helping" the Axis powers and being sympathetic to a European world.

Also I just want to make the point just because x is bad it doesn't not necessarily follow that the opposite of x (lets call it y) must be good. Something can be bad and the opposite of that can also be bad. So if a person believes that Jews are bad it does not follow necessarily that Hitler must be good for wanting to kill them. Hitler did a lot of wrong things. Not to mention he was also very perverted (there is sufficient evidence of his bisexuality and many sexual perversions out there)
There is no evidence of this. Everything is post-war fictional slander or doctored accounts. I've met a few old Germans who knew him, and they had very different things to say than what is in any jew-approved book.

I would appreciate it if the mods would lock or remove this thread, it's not even the right starting point to have a discussion about any of the subject matter, and asking people if they believe any kind of fictional murder is morally acceptable is beyond reproach, even for an online anonymous forum.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top