US Border Crisis

Like I said before, California is a breeding ground for Marxism.





Gs4oQydaAAAskHS

Gs4os1baIAAaIow

Over the past two days, ICE agents have conducted targeted operations across the Los Angeles region, detaining more than 40 suspected illegal aliens. These enforcement actions triggered large-scale demonstrations, some of which turned confrontational, with reports of vandalism, blocked traffic, and physical clashes with federal agents.

The unrest has prompted questions about who is organizing and funding these protests. One of the organizations at the center of the resistance to ICE is the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA), a Los Angeles nonprofit that has long provided legal and advocacy services to illegal aliens. CHIRLA is known for radical positions on immigration—for example, it led a campaign to abolish ICE in 2018.

Yesterday afternoon, as clashes with federal law enforcement were heating up, CHIRLA Executive Director Angelica Salas held a press conference during which she announced that the Los Angeles Rapid Response Network’s hotline had received more than 50 calls reporting ICE activity and sightings of “men in military garb.” LARRN is organized by a coalition of nonprofits, and CHIRLA plays a central role, using its main phone line as the hotline number. LARRN’s hotline is one of the communication systems that allows legal observers, volunteers, and other activists to be quickly dispatched to the scene of immigration enforcement actions.

During her remarks, Salas referred to SEIU California President David Huerta as her “brother,” highlighting CHIRLA’s close ties to organized labor in California. Huerta had been arrested during one of the protests for blocking the path of an ICE vehicle, as shown by video footage released by U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli. Governor Gavin Newsom expressed his unequivocal support for Huerta, claiming he was only “witnessing” the action, while Essayli announced his intention to file criminal charges.

For her part, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass has defiantly opposed federal immigration enforcement in the city, stating on social media Friday, “We will not stand for this” and “No vamos a permitir estas acciones,” (“We are not going to permit these actions”). She added that her office would collaborate with community-based organizations that serve immigrants. She has a long relationship with CHIRLA and bragged last year about obtaining federal funding for CHIRLA’s programs. That grant is part of a broader stream of public dollars that the organization receives from government sources.

In fact, according to a financial audit submitted to the state, the CHIRLA organization received nearly $34 million in revenue from government contracts during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023, with 96% of that funding from the State of California. That figure marks a sharp increase from the prior year, when it received around $12 million in government contract revenue. Agencies contributing to CHIRLA’s funding during this period included the California Department of Social Services, the California Arts Council, the Governor’s Office of Emergency Services, and the Department of Homeland Security. Notably, as mentioned above, a DHS contract funded CHIRLA to provide citizenship instruction and naturalization services.

With $100,000 remaining on CHIRLA’s contract, DHS froze the remaining funds in February. CHIRLA responded by suing. The court denied their motion for a preliminary injunction on May 29. This is one of two lawsuits CHIRLA filed against DHS this year. The other was dismissed for lack of standing and is on appeal.

To sum up how this works: Your tax dollars fund an organization that organizes efforts to directly interfere with the federal government’s lawful exercise of authority. Then, through its lobbying arm, that organization helps get Democrats elected to office, who then repay the favor by ensuring increased funding.

This is the nonprofit industrial complex at work.
Click to expand...



 
Australia Sucks said:
What is interesting is that in their own countries they have their mini rivalries and often don't like the other Latin American countries but when they come to the west they are all band together to some extent. For example in Australia I have seen mixed groups of Latinos all hanging out together (Chileans, Colombians, Argentinians, Peruvians, etc) whereas you see in their own country for example Colombians will talk shit about Venezuelans and Argentinians will talk shit about Colombians and do not associate with them etc.
Click to expand...
They might not like each other for the most part but all the shit talking is usually surface level banter. Usually brought on because of soccer team rivalries and some other mutual cultural similarities.

Their hatred of Europeans or light skinned people is so great to they are willing to put aside differences in order to defeat a common adversary.

Besides hispanics, this rings especially true for blacks, indians, and liberal/democratic whites(who will ally amongst themselves and the very other races looking to exterminate them)

Truly the enemy of my enemy is my friend mentality.
 
Alpha Hunter Zero said:
Latinos, 99% of the time, will NEVER EVER, go against another latino.
Click to expand...
I don't understand what you're trying to say with this statement. Latinos are not great but they're not the worst. I'm going to go out on a limb and say they do go against each other. Is every latino out assaulting these oppressed cops? The way these conservatives are talking you would think the problem with these migrants is the toll they have on police officers when they're not allowed to do their job. The problem with migrants is they don't belong, either conquer the land, assimilate or stay home, it will always come down to that.

This is just a situation where people pick a side. Obviously if you force a "proud" latino to pick a side, he's going with his own. People should understand that social cohesion works a lot better when everyone is very similar to each other, including genetically. "Cultural harmony" is fairly weak in bad times.
 
True, but combine that with Gibs, Sports Teams, and Manuel wearing his favorite over-sized jersey, driving dat Carolina Squated Silverado and Jews telling them, this was theirs and We took it from them. Well lets just say that reality hasn't and won't set in until enough Whites are gone.
 
So since Mexico has a Jewish President and what not, anybody have a good info into Jewish control and subversion south of the border including Central and South America? Say for the last 200+ years? Or before?

I assume short of White Expansion all over, what was Jews role in much of this? Basically finding out what is a Jewish Operation vs. Christian European colonizing to actually better people.

The way I see it, Jews were in it for power and Ultimately Total Control, and they always had ways of subverting the actual truth with Native and European Population relationship.

Just some thinking on this Sunday afternoon.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top