Tucker Carlson Thread

"God's work"? 🤣

Tucker is entertaining and sometimes says something interesting and of relevance. But he doesn't do anything but talk. The guy loves to hear himself talk. Personally, I've heard enough

I have an interesting question: Is Tucker more or less trustworthy than Candace? Is it possible to measure? Currently for some reason he edges out Candace in my mind. Her early history and attachment to extremely wealthy powerful zionists in the family she married into makes me put her lower than Tucker. Tucker being attached/adjacent to CIA is still a red flag though.

Interested in hearing other people's thoughts on this.
 
Both of them have some globalist family ties, and Tucker might have even dabbled into Kabbalah in the past based on the red string he used to have on his wrist, but you really get the sense that they are both genuinely good Christian soldiers today. There is no content of theirs from the last few years that lends me to believe that they are anything less than the real deal.

Tucker is a bit emotionally smarter than Candace, who is more impulsive due to her feminine side, but that spunkier side has also pushed Candace to breach risky topics.
 
Tucker might have even dabbled into Kabbalah in the past based on the red string he used to have on his wrist,
I forgot about that. I guess him taking it off could be interpreted as a good sign. Sometimes I wish these people would be a little more forthright on their thoughts/beliefs. I sense a mask for their public persona. On this point it actually seems Candace has less of a mask. Granted this is somewhat of an inbuilt feature of being a public person as well.
 
Is Tucker more or less trustworthy than Candace?
I would say that anybody who is "allowed" to talk on big platform media these days is being allowed to talk for a reason. Remember, with advances in surveillance tech (((they))) can pretty much get to anyone, anytime, anywhere, and so why aren't Candace and Tucker just being outright killed or deplatformed on JewTube? And so then the question becomes, "Why are they
being allowed to talk, much less live?" As we've seen with guys like Luigi Mangione it's easy to just walk up to someone and bust a cap in them. So why isn't more of that type of thing happening? Sure, Candace and Tucker obviously have tight security, but if some "normie" (who most likely had help) can take out Charlie Kirk with relative ease, just think what Mossad or CIA could do to Candace or Tucker should the directive be given. But the directive is not being given. And why is that?
 
I would say that anybody who is "allowed" to talk on big platform media these days is being allowed to talk for a reason.
This is true to some degree, but think past some of the control measures: people talk and are quite clearly debanked, cancelled, etc. So not everyone is totally controlled.

Then you have all the confused controlled op claims, none of which can be debunked/are unfalsifiable so they end up being moot points.

Do they let some discourse just occur to keep people guessing? Of course. But that means it can be true at the same time, or it wouldn't work.
 
I would say that anybody who is "allowed" to talk on big platform media these days is being allowed to talk for a reason. Remember, with advances in surveillance tech (((they))) can pretty much get to anyone, anytime, anywhere, and so why aren't Candace and Tucker just being outright killed or deplatformed on JewTube? And so then the question becomes,

That is generally true, about those being allowed, but the thing with both Tucker and Candace is that they got very big before they went rogue. Tucker was the biggest show on Fox for years, Fox liked having him around because he gave them some cred with the smarter conservative segment, the kind of legitimacy that the other Fox clowns like Levin or even Hannity didn't have as much.

Tucker's relationship with Fox was rocky, and eventually they had to let him go. By that time he was so big he could carry his own show. Tucker kept pushing the enveloppe but always skillfully remained just inside the Overton window of the smarter than average purple-pilled conservative.

Candace followed a similar path, (they)) built her up, and she gradually turned on them, before burning her bridges completely.
 
Listen and learn l;


I'm half way through the interview.

Tucker has been setting off my spider sense since I started watching him on FOX in 2017 because he would never say Jesus on air or react in any way to someone on his show saying Jesus, but he claimed to be a Christian.

Also, his naiveté on some issues seems incongruent with his knowledge on others, but could be explained Alaskan sized blind spots.

When he was on FOX in 2017, he gave totally gullible interviews to two different high level antifa organizers, but was then was suprised when they attacked his house while his wife was alone during his air time. This event was probably real but perhaps exaggerated in order to earn him street cred.

Further along the same line, could Tucker, a man whose wife was terrorized by Antifa in her own home, and we assume would have possibly been murdered if they'd gained access (according to the story), could he have been foolish enough to feature one of his own personal friends on an episode of his show where the friend test drove a Tesla truck? He showed several places around his rural home, and mentioned others that he frequents, which all took place after the extreme vandalism of Tesla dealerships in many parts of the USA, as well as numerous death threats against Musk himself. Is Tucker possibly stupid enough to put his friend at risk for ratings?

However, when Tucker had Stormy Daniel's (the tart whom Trump paid off) lawyer, Michael Avenatti (later sentenced to 2½ years in federal prison) do an in-person interview in Sept 2018, it was a brutally honest and cutting Tucker that he apparently unleashed in defense of a woman who was being ripped off and exploited by a corrupt lawyer.

Tucker's angle now is to show up extremely late to every right wing or truther party, like trad Christianity, 9/11 truth, and The Great Noticing, "expose" what's been common knowledge for the decades Tucker was denouncing it previously, and suddenly proclaim his abundant sympathy to these causes, except for one:

Whitey can not be allowed to organize politically because that is against the universal principles of the Christianity he grew up with and yet, a year ago, he said he had to go out and purchase a Bible because he had none, but he did infamously have his Kaballah wristlet prior.

Tucker's performance in his interview with Huckabee is astounding in its Orwellian double-talking sincerity. Only the child of a high-level CIA propaganda spook, who'd entered the Mockingbird media at such a young age, could have pulled off this Hollywood Oscar level artful deception through his feigned outrage and awe shucks self deprecation.

The only way for Tucker to establish sincerity is to defend his idea that "identity politics" is wrong and Tucker vs. Keith Woods on this topic would be a potentially mortal blow to Clown World.



 
Heard more of the interview and these two actors revealed their hole cards in a big way. While testifying to the gloriousness of universal principles "as Christians" and arguing about who was more loyal to America, there emerged a few obvious moments in close succession where, in defense of the universal idea that it's bad to massacre children, the dilemma silently arose of how they can prioritize American lives while constantly challenging each other to profess that all lives are of equal worth, and they both completely ignored it!

Hahahahahaha!!!

Clown World "theology" strikes again! 🤡 🌎
 
Back
Top