Bill Ackman and the bankers, lol
Bill Ackman and the bankers, lol
What Tucker is getting at is that the financialization of the economy made the USA a game of "making money" and not providing anything real or wealth building, just money building. That was rewarded over all REAL jobs, well beyond it in fact, there is no doubt.I don’t like Bill Ackman for many reasons but one of those ain’t because he did a personal bet against Herbalife. Years ago he did a 2-3 hour presentation exposing how Herbalife is a big scam.
To profit from that is a good deed. To lose investor’s money is a totally different beast.
Former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett is threatening Tucker Carlson.
Martyrs make such a big difference. Wouldn't you want to be the kind of martyr you could imagine him being? That would be so awesome!I mean, I hate to say it but we could use a martyr. If (((they))) took out Tucker it might cause a ruckus which is why they probably won't do it. I believe (((They))) have advanced weaponry and what Tucker described as a "Demon that attacked him in his sleep and left marks on his back" (paraphrasing) could have been some version of this. It is also possible that he experienced a true "other worldly" attack and that the upper echelons of humanity have in fact merged with "other beings" in some capacity. Billy Corgan of Smashing Pumpkins fame claims to have seen a human "shape shift," Alex Jones makes some weird statements on this topic as well, and I myself have experienced some weird sh*t with regards to telepathically communicating with objects in the sky. There was also those "sonic attacks" a few years back at the US Embassy in Cuba that did some real permanent damage to some Embassy staff if I'm not mistaken.
At any rate, there's some strange sh*t going on out there and maybe there are high level people in our government and society that are keeping silent because they know that there is truly something to fear.
No, because I'm not the one with a CIA dad who is out there getting rich running my mouth on controversial subjects in public. When you play jew games flip flopping from left to right over the course of your lifetime (while getting rich doing so) expect to win jew prizes.Martyrs make such a big difference. Wouldn't you want to be the kind of martyr you could imagine him being? That would be so awesome!
I mean, I hate to say it but we could use a martyr. If (((they))) took out Tucker it might cause a ruckus which is why they probably won't do it. I believe (((They))) have advanced weaponry and what Tucker described as a "Demon that attacked him in his sleep and left marks on his back" (paraphrasing) could have been some version of this. It is also possible that he experienced a true "other worldly" attack and that the upper echelons of humanity have in fact merged with "other beings" in some capacity. Billy Corgan of Smashing Pumpkins fame claims to have seen a human "shape shift," Alex Jones makes some weird statements on this topic as well, and I myself have experienced some weird sh*t with regards to telepathically communicating with objects in the sky. There was also those "sonic attacks" a few years back at the US Embassy in Cuba that did some real permanent damage to some Embassy staff if I'm not mistaken.
At any rate, there's some strange sh*t going on out there and maybe there are high level people in our government and society that are keeping silent because they know that there is truly something to fear.
I always figured Tucker was a very smooth gatekeeper. After hearing this and facts about Tucker I didn’t know prior, I now know he is a very well paid, very smooth gatekeeper.
Yeah, I'm skeptical of anyone who talks for "work." That being said, the above was a good rant and he makes some valid points concerning Tucker and Candace.Nick is only good in short clips. When you start watching his streams, you'll start to see all of his shortcomings as a person.
I always figured Tucker was a very smooth gatekeeper. After hearing this and facts about Tucker I didn’t know prior, I now know he is a very well paid, very smooth gatekeeper.
My take on it is, the more censored you are, the most I trust you.Problem with Nick, there isn't a single political commentator, big or small, that he hasn't run up against with a similar rant at some point. In Nicks mind, everyone but him is stupid, controlled, wrong. He's the only one with the correct answers, to everything.
I used to watch his streams a few years ago, and every day there was a new person in his crosshairs, even if they were on the same side politically, over the most trivial of minor disagreements. I don't know if it's just pathological extremely online zoomerism, where you have to constantly insult other people, or something else, ego perhaps.
In this clip he said something to the effect of "I've never talked down to people below me" when I've seen him do just that numerous times. I remember a clip where he suggested working in the trades is "for stupid poor people", etc.
Nick is only good in short clips. When you start watching his streams, you'll start to see all of his shortcomings as a person.
At some point you have to just go with your own instinct, and stop subbing to a brand.My take on it is, the more censored you are, the most I trust you.
Nick being more censored that Tucker, makes me give him more trust. Tucker is happy to discuss the issues, spread the information ,but beat around the bush about who is to blame, and never offer any solutions other than to retreat to the woods.
Nick at least will name who to blame, but again, he has no solutions either. While I do trust Nick more than Tucker, I still never trusted Nick. The fact he got away with his actions on Jan 6th. The fact it took him so long to realize that Trump is a fraud. He called the guys I do trust and listen to "wing-nats" but they were already warning us Trump was a fraud in 2017, for good reason, and they are now 100% exonerated for it. NIck doesn't believe in working out, eating healthy blue-collar work, starting a family, and he now basically takes the talking points of the "wing-nats" and waters them down, messes up some facts they share, and tries to rehash it as his own "knowledge".
But I am happy to see the gatekeepers eat each other up. They will all have to be torn down so people can find the path to the true red-pill and solutions for how to fix these serious problems.
Things will get worse, Tucker's words will soon become too bland for anyone upset at how things are going to continue to tune in, and they will seek out real sources of information. Nick at the same time is not respected by men who want to have families, be leaders, fight, grow, and become strong men, so he is cooked as well.
If I had to guess who will eventually become a leader in all of this, it will be someone like Thomas Rousseau, but Rousseau is missing out on the "one struggle" piece that will prevent him from being the guy. It will be some young guy like him, who is nuanced more in world history and world events, and not just national events/history. Maybe they even come from Patriot Front or some other organization. But he has not arrived yet, for now we have Gen X truth tellers who are building the road for this leader by spreading much more factual information to the public.
It isn't about subbing to a band. It is about two important things...At some point you have to just go with your own instinct, and stop subbing to a brand.
They want people corralled into these various pens of quarreling political factions, each with their own flawed leaders, who are easily dismissed on account of their glaring personality defects/lifestyle choices.
My take on it is, the more censored you are, the most I trust you.
Nick being more censored that Tucker, makes me give him more trust. Tucker is happy to discuss the issues, spread the information ,but beat around the bush about who is to blame, and never offer any solutions other than to retreat to the woods.
I don't know much about Anglin, what I do know is he seems legit, but not good at leading a cause, which is fine, at least he speaks truth to power. I don't listen to him much, he went rage pill in 2016 and that was enough to keep me away. I'm not saying he is a bad actor, but he took some questionable actions, I feel were based on bad judgement and not being a fed operative. I could be wrong about him, I don't care, I don't consume any of his content.What about Andrew Anglin? He's been censored almost into oblivion, to the point that even a ton of redpilled folks aren't even aware of him. Just because he been driven to the far corner of the interwebs doesn't automatically mean he's therefore trustworthy...
And even if someone can call the shots ahead of time and lay everything out, what actual difference does it make in your life?
Anyone can say virtually anything online, but how many people are making a positive difference in the everyday life of those around them?
The bottom line for me, and the point I've reached is: if the person helps me to draw closer to Christ Jesus and the church, I will give them my attention. Otherwise, they are just a distraction in the long term.
Life is too short to waste with terminally online internet personalities...
I believe that one of the ways they work to prevent organization is by putting these e-celeb led factions out there, who spend a lot of time and energy fighting with each other...It isn't about subbing to a band. It is about two important things...
#1) Factual information that allows you to both know who the culprits are and then will allow you to find a solution.
#2) Organization. The reason they push the "freedom and individual liberty" so much in the west, the "let them do as they please" mentality is the only way to beat this is organization against the satanic elites. If you are red pilled but run off to the woods to hide out, you are no more a threat to the system than some blue pilled urbanite.
I get factual information from the sources I consume. I can only wait and pray for organization.