The Trump-Vance Administration (The People Who Work For Trump)

homersheineken said:
So we see arrests in 3, 2, 1 ....

2 weeks????
Click to expand...

Elon said there will most likely be arrests over the SS abuse. Hopefully a foreshadowing of things to come.

Of course, arrests won't mean anything if a random judge can throw out the case.

Also Republicans have put forward a bill to curtail the power of federal judges, however, it will never clear the Senate 60 vote filibuster threshold.
 
Dusty said:


I remember on the RvF I was disappointed that T selected Barrett because she’s a woman who adopted a black kid, and I got a lot of push back. She said she wept with her black kid when St Floyd OD’d.

I was right.
Click to expand...


Trump term #1 was more about appeasing everyone thinking it would help society and country rather than getting things done. Luckily he has learned now in round two, but the whiff on this traitor bitch was a massive blunder set back which will hurt for a very long time.
 
Dusty said:


I remember on the RvF I was disappointed that T selected Barrett because she’s a woman who adopted a black kid, and I got a lot of push back. She said she wept with her black kid when St Floyd OD’d.

I was right.
Click to expand...


I wasn't sure, but the fact the liberals weren't screaming at her like Kavanaugh was a huge red flag.

Still, 2/3 ain't bad, and Amy has voted decently on some issues. She repealed Roe v Wade, and she voted against Vax mandates.
 
budoslavic said:
This is a good example of why I am very skeptical of - and I don't trust - Rubio.

Click to expand...


You guys should be very careful with this, infighting at this stage of the game is still dangerous, but you can't let the neo-cons walk over you.

My suggestion, troll Marco Rubio.

Don't attack or criticise him, mock him into submission and ensure that Trump knows he has the support and leeway to afford risking his relationship with the neo-cons based to protect good virtuous people like this man.

Share this topic where you can, but frame it in a lens that doesn't strengthen the left.

A good way to do it, would be to suggest Marco Rubio probably argued with him over Israel. Sine on the left hate Israel, and some don't, but forcing them to defend either the USAID destroying isolationist conservative, or the Israel loyalist neocon will scatter their attempts to use this information as propaganda and leave their forces in disarray.

Best part, it's probably true.

Marco Rubio is pro-Israel after all.

Philippians 4:8
King James Version
8 Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good report; if there be any virtue, and if there be any praise, think on these things.
 
Trump in a speech at a White House dinner hinted clearly, mentioned Rubio got 99 confirmation votes (said JD hadn't voted), and that he wasn't sure if that was good or bad.

edit: to clarify he wasnt sure it was good Rubio got 99 votes 50 from the Dems while other candidates were difficult to push through, deep state guy no question
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top