When you write that he is 'not one of us', what is it you're assuming?
I don't see myself as 'left' or 'right-wing'. I am a Christian. I welcome the opportunity to discuss a wide variety of topics, many of them considered controversial, that this forum provides, and many of my opinions are certainly politically unorthodox, but I feel it's wrong to view this forum as a 'right-wing' talking shop. The left/right dichotomy is a false one, IMHO.
I didn’t reference the left/right distinction because it goes well beyond that.
My issue with Brand is that he seems to have chameleon-like qualities.
When he’s wanted to get applause from conventional leftists, he’s attacked people like Farage on Question Time. I personally think Enoch Powell was and still is the most prescient politician in post-World War II Western history, but Brand comparing him to Farage was all about insinuating that Farage was stoking a “Rivers of Blood” race war.
To garner applause from legitimately skeptical people, those concerned about corporate hegemony and propaganda, Brand’s now gone down a different route.
Brand hitherto had an entire lucrative career out of “fighting” the establishment (after a career sucking up to it), as the money he has lost since demonetization shows. Mentioning that demonetization as “proof” he is a real activist willing to sacrifice for a cause is not a valid argument, as I doubt even he came anywhere close to predicting the current wave of sexual abuse allegations.
Farage may have SOME money due to a reasonably successful trading career and European political salary for decades, but it’s peanuts compared to the vitriol he’s faced.
Brand waltzed into “fighting” and made millions from verbose commentary/boilerplate. He reminds me of a vulgar, more leftwing Tomi Lahren, merely packaging well-worn, albeit valid material and pretending he’s coming along with some new, precious insights nobody else has thought of (or publicly stated).
There are leftists I dislike for their views, like Chomsky, but one can at least respect some of his views and insights, and admire the consistency with which he holds them.
Noam Chomsky doesn’t seem to get relevance deprivation syndrome and change course to carve out a new sort of popularity. Brand does.
Again, I see the sexual abuse allegations against Russell Brand as likely coordinated and concocted. Making abuse allegations now often means a legal attempt to get civil damages, enriching the plaintiff even if a criminal trial is unsuccessful. The idea that accusers “can’t benefit” is laughable. That said, Brand’s present political shtick is disingenuous in my eyes, aside from him almost certainly being targeted for his stated views with these accusations.