Only instead of him getting physically attacked by 20 white knights at the club he is getting 20 white women (since IIMT has learned about the dangers of miscegenation from his deep dive podcasts) hug attacking at the his 2nd part time very socially oriented job. Maybe he employs some of those classic RVF 1.0 PUA tactics on the ladies: "Hey did you guys see that Iranian missile attack on Tel Aviv outside?" or "Nice white Aryan blonde hair - is it real?"
^ Post of the Month.
The only guys who believe your stories are the same ones who believe:
- Earth is flat
- Hitler was a great commander
- Space is fake
In spite of that I enjoy the entertainment you provide.
I think the biggest key to stay young (feel good, have energy, feel optimistic) is to eat healthy and keep active. Avoid pleasure, learn to live without it. Intermittent fasting on your non-lifting days. A few longer fasts once a month or so. Cut out all sugar, eat more fruit and veggies, research juicing or healthy blended drinks, and cut out alcohol. If you do these things, you will feel great well into your 60's or even later if you are blessed.
I feel great in my late 40's, I have 20 something women hitting on me, and it is because I do these things. Also, as you get older your...
Maybe he meant 20 year olds, but even still, ~30 year difference is still legendary Little Dark territory.
Imagining 20 x 20-year-olds hitting on him is even funnier.
In fact, we don't have to imagine anymore.
I've got my hands on CCTV footage of the man of our time desperately holding onto his stoicism at the local Whole Foods store, while 20 extremely hot yet financially destitute women attempt a non-consentual hug close:
What are you getting at? All of It Is My Time's statements are coherent and make perfect sense.
The attention a man gets can vary a lot on how he carries himself. You can improve that with age.
I'm going to answer this question sincerely because I have seen some good contributions from you. In particular I appreciate your boots-on-the-ground stories from Asia and your willingness to counter the manufactured one-sided narrative that plagues the China thread.
The last few pages have explained the context behind my post, drawing upon the guy's posting history to reveal a string of inconsistent and extreme claims. I'll elaborate on this for anyone unfamiliar with this history that extends back to RVF.
First, women lack courage, are extremely sensitive to rejection, and are prone to anxiety about reputational damage. Moreover, they are now accustomed to getting inundated with attention from men online. Accordingly,
women only initiate direct sexualised advances under a very limited range of circumstances.
Except on very rare occasions, women do not approach men in public places in daylight to signal sexual intent. In fact, women have become so passive and reliant on digital attention that they get frustrated by merely having to use the wave emoji
Details here:
That is hilarious
Here's the (paraphrased) press release from the bumble CEO:
Here at bumble, we created a platform to empower women.
We are strong, independent, and feirce!
Also, Bumble recognises women's unique pain.
We know that typing the two letters of "h" and "i", hitting the copy button, and THEN pasting it into *literally* a million chats is a dreadful burden that understandably makes women want to give up dating altogether...
Note that "hitting on" is an active form of showing sexual intent. It does NOT mean passive, ambiguous signs like sustained eye contact. Sure, women tend to give off signals of passive, indirect, and tentative interest without making it obvious. Some of this occurs at the unconscious level. Nonetheless, the majority of men misinterpret social courtesy, friendliness, and especially manipulative flirting as real signs of sexual attraction.
The sexual overperception bias relates to the tendency to overperceive another individual’s sexual interest in oneself. The bias predominantly occurs in men, where they are more likely to overestimate a woman’s sexual interest, while women are more likely to underestimate a man’s.
Further reading:
Sexual overperception bias is the tendency for males to mistakenly perceive interest more often than mistakenly not perceiving interest.
thedecisionlab.com
Second, with the above in mind, here is one claim of IIMT that defies believability:
A long with the 20 somethings, are the 30 somethings, 40 somethings, even older women hitting on me...
The poster claims to meet women in everyday social/work settings, not through environments like clubs and bars where women are likely to be drunk, ovulating, and otherwise uninhibited. The claim that
multiple groups of women are
actively hitting on him
regularly in
everyday environments can only mean that:
(a) he is consciously lying

, or
(b) he is suffering from genuine delusion and has lost touch with reality

, or
(c) the most effortlessly-attractive man on earth posts amongst us
Now, he can attempt to dismiss these arguments by twisting the meaning of these words, say that "actually what I meant was something else", or claim that he doesn't care what others think, etc. All of these tactics are deflections, reflect avoidance of responsibility, and offer further confirmation that his words cannot be taken seriously. My advice to IIMT is to stick to geo-political and societal-level topics.
Third, I have close friends who are committed to remaining unmarried and/or childless. This is a personal decision that I will not and cannot judge others for. In this world of digital survival and escape, I understand the allure of the lone wolf "I don't need anyone" lifestyle. Yet living like a financially rich, yet socially isolated and deeply bitter man who prioritises daily comforts and holds onto all his riches for himself is not a great role model to aspire to.
Notice how many of their arguments rely on mental catastrophising about future possibilities like divorce, societal collapse, WW3 etc. This indicates that their choices and lifestyle are fundamentally driven by avoidance-based motivation - anxiety, fear, etc.
Yet to achieve our greatest potential in life, we need to make our positive goals and hopeful visions stronger than those worries and fears.
Younger members may be influenced by a few older members who flood the forum with ideas that, if actioned, delay self-improvement and purposeful dating as the means to potentially start a family one day. Half-truths like this can be quite compelling, especially for an anxious young man:
Men age like fine wine, and huge financial assets (in the millions) are necessary to build before having a family. You wouldn't want to be a financially insecure father and husband would you? So, take as long as you want to get married and have kids because even when you're 40/50+ you can still produce sperm, and can still get young attractive women as long as you have one thing above all: a lot of money
It is certainly
possible to start a family in your 40s, have a younger wife in her twenties, maintain your health and vitality into your middle age etc. Nobody needs to sell me on these possibilities, because I've made them a reality. However, there are
numerous risks, missed opportunities, and significant costs that come with the quoted approach. Further explanation here:
I don't think that in and of itself is propaganda. However, the real "propaganda" is the belief that all it takes is a bunch of resources. Unless we're talking insane financial resources aka the type that will get young women to fly to Dubai to meet the supposed man of their dreams, women won't choose a man off money alone. Not even a 30 year old will, so why would a 20 year old do that?
Additional factors, like being in shape, humor/charisma, social intelligence and confidence etc., are often glossed over.
Human connection actually matters. In a job interview does the objectively...
Last, I'm not here to insult anyone because they're not able or successful in a particular area. That's unnecessarily demeaning and doesn’t help anyone.
I truly wish that every forum member can achieve their positive vision for their life. Similarly, I've explained elsewhere why overly-negative responses are best minimised in order to maintain a sense of charity and good faith posting:
For most readers, I imagine that they either don't know or can't remember or don't care about all the different reaction scores.
For instance, many posters will continue to be digitally punished for posting content about leftist soyboys, despite being far from soy themselves.
My suggestion is to simplify this list to reduce confusion about reacting to the content vs the poster. So, I would recommend associating all the above reactions with a neutral score, except for the following, which would result in a negative score:
Dislike -1
Ban -5
That said, I believe these...
That said, some repeated positions are
so ridiculous that turning the situation into a joke is the only way to keep myself engaged here. Once it's clear that a member is not posting in good faith; is misrepresenting things; is proposing ludicrous ideals; and/or has not respected the numerous attempts by other members to consider alternatives to their resentful attitudes or unrealistic ideals... then I think they're fair game for satirical mocking. In any case, most of my posts are meant to be light-hearted. I'm here for a good time not a long time
I trust this clarifies my thoughts.
Now I'll leave the readers with a beautiful post to meditate on:
Psalm 127:3. "Children are a gift from the Lord. They are a reward from Him."
1 John 2:15. "Do not love the world, or anything in the world. If anyone loves the world, love for the Father is not in them".
You do not know fear or love until you have children, that I can tell you. Nor do you need millions, as I can attest. Yes, without children I would have a nicer car and maybe have more holidays, but so what? I do not care for these empty things. Becoming a father immediately taught me forgiveness, and healed an open wound from my childhood. Thank you, Lord. I will be taking my children to church in the morning, so that I can plant the seeds that will lead them into relationship with Christ, and the sower and the reaper can rejoice together.
Stop loving the world, stop fearing the world, and make babies before it's too late. Reminds me of the scene in Collateral, where Tom Cruise's character chews out Denzel's character for not just starting his limo business early instead of staying a taxi driver forever and making excuses. Pro tip: there is never a 'right time' to have children, as you will always need to sacrifice for them. However, the things that you sacrifice for them are worth far less than what you gain, so again, thank you, Lord.