The morality of piracy

I think the morality of piracy depends on the individual's stance on Intellectual Property. IP is a globalhomo tyranny scam with some exceptions. We are already seeing globalhomo abusing it. Patents are especially egregious.

Ironically, searching up "piracy" and "copyright laws" on YouTube yields a bunch of pro-piracy videos like these below...something is going on with YouTube lately...




Exactly, "AI" just lifted everyone's data and privacy without a single objection from the larger "governmental" or law structures. The same ones the behemoths lobby to unjustly ("through law") manipulate and charge you for doing X, considering Y, or attempting Z.

It's pretty clear at this point that little of this matters. It's basically the time old "principled" guy that is just a sucker. It turns out in life that one should treat humans in his interaction with them as is right and just. But even that can be contextual and situational (lying obviously isn't always wrong). When it comes to public spheres and nation states, it's an entirely different ball of wax, typically bigger picture entities vs. one another, not an individual somehow acting like he is, or can change, a country. A good example is acting like murder on an individual level is akin to fighting in wars. And even in those there is self defense, pre-emptive actions, etc.

It's an interesting thing that modern people don't really talk about many of the classically masculine realities of life, like leadership, war, women's roles, etc. We've gone far too soft and hippie Jesus pacifist, from what I see.
 
I would say that yes it is stealing. If you get a "free" file shared copy of something that is has an active copyright, then you are stealing from the owners of the copyright. That's what copyright means.

I know that people used to record albums onto cassette tapes all the time, and people borrow books or check them out of the library, but I think this is different somehow. Files can be shared on a mass scale, which is totally different than recording a cassette tape or borrowing a single physical book and returning it.

Likewise, I know that some people say "information wants to be free", but this is just a rationalization and a rallying cry for file sharing platforms to trade in stolen data. Everybody does it, and it seems like a small sin, but when I consider the matter, I have to conclude it is stealing.
What about internet archives of public articles which were once considered free but since are archived? The creator took the risk of it being public (in order to maximize exposure), and later it was made private. Are internet archives illegal and/or immoral to view?
 
What about internet archives of public articles which were once considered free but since are archived? The creator took the risk of it being public (in order to maximize exposure), and later it was made private. Are internet archives illegal and/or immoral to view?
If somebody took the trouble to curate this material and paid for hosting on a server to make it available, and setup a website so you could find it and access it, them it is fair for them to charge for that access. In many cases this paid service will have also had to scan a paper book to create an electronic copy, and likely do some formatting to produce the final document.

If it is off copyright, and you don't want to pay to use the platform they created, then you should find a different source that is free. Of course if the free source is requesting donations to help cover their costs, the decent thing to do would be to make a donation.

If there is no other free source for this off copyright material you are seeking, then it's fair to say that the paid site is creating value and deserves to be able to charge for it.
 
Back
Top