The Mark of the Beast

There has to be some kind of combination of flesh and machine. That would be the only way it would be permanent and irreversible. The nano-graphene technology, the black goo (formed from vast amounts of nanites) could be the bridge that connects flesh to machine. The surest way of delivery of this substance into the human body so far was been through syringes, injections, "vaccinations". What affects the flesh affects the vessel for the soul. If our genetic codex is corrupted with additional DNA artificially, then I believe it does affect the soul in some way. However all it has done so far is make people weak, stupid, sick, and die suddenly. It has not turned any people into superhuman chimeras capable of great feats of strength like someone who is demonically possessed.

Then the system has to be completely functioning. The anti-Christ system will not work in a world full of non-Whites using indian and chinese plastic tech. It will be shoddy at best.

Then there is the matter of will. God gave us all free will, and we have to be a willing participant in this system. All the old people and children who were forced to have this substance put into their body or force-enrolled into the technological services are not choosing to do so.

If this were a more advanced age like eons ago, where the spiritual and the physical blended in nearly everything, then I would say such a contraption would be possible. Right now we are living in a delusion, no doubt of the devil, but CBDC's have no real strength outside of a pixelated screen. "AI" isn't really sentient first, and the existing models are constantly becoming a better pattern-recognitionist than any of us but the jewish programmers and the shabbos-goy woke programmers have to keep putting safeguards in the models to prevent them from being "racist" aka racially aware of the various biological differences between the races and "anti-satanic" aka recognizing the jews and their agenda afoot in everything.

Whatever they come up with will not be what is described in Revelations, but a cheap Great Value knockoff that revolutionaries and violent White men will easily avoid.
 
Wow, it's a very interesting post. I liked the link to his "Technology as an accelerator of time" more (Guenon's ideas) as an explainer of all sorts of things that are going on in the modern age that people can sense, but can't make sense of.

Regarding the "digital panopticon", a lot of it seems possible but also it seems quite Person of Interest directed, such as in the case of this Mr. Robinson, who no one can tell is not set up entirely. There are so many things that they don't have control over, including Trump ascending to the presidency, the possibility of division after this election, the monetary and debt system, etc. It seems that too many things can go wrong for them and they don't have enough time to implement all the change, even with scam crises and scares like C19. The reason I'm scared about a big time hot war is that it seems to me to be the elites only change to scare others into submission. But will they use nuclear weapons and risk their own safety? I don't see that happening really, but I won't rule out a geographic or site direct nuke. That's why the Israel-Iran thing is so scary, especially since Israel is losing favor globally, regardless of anyone's political sentiment.

An interesting link by the last commenter on his work. It is funny that it ends as an appeal to a German with eastern mystic inklings, called Bo Yin Ra, originally Joseph Schneiderfranken. It's a fairly classic western appeal to prayer and meditation that the west lost after the Great Schism and losing Orthodoxy. Luckily for most, Eastern Orthodoxy is ascending as people are realizing it is the fullness of the truth, and we must find our way now, looking unto Jesus Christ, the Author and Perfecter of our faith.
 
Whatever they come up with will not be what is described in Revelations, but a cheap Great Value knockoff that revolutionaries and violent White men will easily avoid.
The neuralink device would currently be the best rebuttal to your argument. Since the optimus bots and more are coming within just a decade, and we have robotic prostheses already, it's not a far stretch. There's another issue coming up that really hurts the money printing part of things in the next 5-7 years: the solar minimum and much, much lower sunspot activity. Productivity, already declining, will be a lot harder as the scam monetary system disincentivizes even more people, due to their general envy of the massively shrinking "rich" population, which has exponentially more as time goes on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JR5
The neuralink device would currently be the best rebuttal to your argument. Since the optimus bots and more are coming within just a decade, and we have robotic prostheses already, it's not a far stretch. There's another issue coming up that really hurts the money printing part of things in the next 5-7 years: the solar minimum and much, much lower sunspot activity. Productivity, already declining, will be a lot harder as the scam monetary system disincentivizes even more people, due to their general envy of the massively shrinking "rich" population, which has exponentially more as time goes on.
Neuralink is an occult dream, nothing more. It will not last in the human body in the long term.

If someone gets a cornea transplant they have to take steroidal drops in that eye every day for the rest of their life on the chance that their body rejects the tissue. That's a piece of gelatinous flesh that only covers the lens of an eyeball, not even an entire organ, or a skin graft. What effect do you think completely compositional foreign material will have if it is inserted into the human body? Our bodies have a way of recognizing and attempting to expel foreign objects. The more it interacts with the nervous system, the more likely it is to be recognized and rejected by the body, compared to a screws and bolts in bone and spine surgeries that just sit there, and even those have had issues with localized tissue around it post-surgery.

The robotics will get more advanced within localized specialties, but never beyond that. There is no bridge to give a synthesis of sentience with mechanical chassis and its ability to move and conduct work like a human body. The robots that exist now and that are currently in development, are merely beasts of burden. The only bridge that creates the best use of them is human operators on drones. The bridge is between man and machine using a human mind.

The divide between the rich and the poor always swells right before a crash. I don't disagree with the money situation. It will always get worse and never get better. Such is the consequence of nations who fall under the yoke of the jew. Be prepared to exert primality with violence in the future as the money printer goes from brrrrrrr to zilch. We, either in the USA or Europe, are not 1920s Germany with a racially harmonious population that will not actively tear itself apart when these conditions reach critical Weimar. We are all in a jar of bugs of different species all more volatile to us under stress, a jar that is going to be shaken by the fattest, cruelest, stinkiest, ugliest jewish kid on the block.
 
So what do you think it'll be then?

All the old people and children who were forced to have this substance put into their body or force-enrolled into the technological services are not choosing to do so.

For those of us who denied injection, what do we get classified as, "super free will"? I don't think most people who received injections did it involuntarily. The fact that they weren't wise enough to just get a piece of paper through bribe shows you also how lazy they are, and how they didn't really take any of it seriously.

The injection was a type of mark, but I think we'll see whatever the real attempt is as being something to maintain free services, health care, food stamp welfare, etc. and most likely will be something similar to a chip, a tattoo, ink marking, etc.
 
I read the article. As always, Neofeudal writes pretty well and usually backs up his opinions and ideas with very good sources and illustrative figures. BUT, the problem is that he's just promoting "doomer-porn" and doesn't even mention easy ways that normies can use right now to avoid globalhomo's gay technology and surveillance. For example, while the NSA is constantly surveilling all of us, if you communicate with an open-source, end-to-end encrypted chat software on a device with a secure and open OS, firmware, and hardware, then this is all moot. A lot of globalhomo's rubbish can become irrelevant overnight if normies actually use the proper technology to opt-out.
 
A lot of globalhomo's rubbish can become irrelevant overnight if normies actually use the proper technology to opt-out.
Like?

By the way, he is correct on most things but is far too dependent on doom writing for attraction. As we have seen in the past, we are all "right" about what's going on but it happens over periods of time that are much longer than any of us can think or act on, in a certain sense.
 
I enjoy his blog too, but his ideas on Gnosticism being a religious path that people should take, along with the idea of a demiurge running the show, I find a bit unsettling. His research and some of the things he points out seem correct for the most part, but I think he is blind to what God can do because of his spiritual paradigm.

For instance, what will the influx of young men into Orthodox Christianity do to the overall equation? Just a few days ago there was an article published about Universities closing down. People aren't going to universities, but churches are filling up with young men that are disenfranchised from society. These kind of things make me think that something else is in the works and that God is moving in ways we won't entirely understand until the time is right.
 
For instance, what will the influx of young men into Orthodox Christianity do to the overall equation? Just a few days ago there was an article published about Universities closing down. People aren't going to universities, but churches are filling up with young men that are disenfranchised from society.
Yes, this is another topic on which we are way ahead of the times, which is frustrating to us. We see it so clearly, and I can assure you, I've been to many churches where boomers are pleased and smile when they see all of these "young men coming into the church" but it's like they have never thought about why that's occurring. Like at all. And I'm not saying that they are just coming into the church because they are totally locked out by society to have a future, to get jobs, to have opportunities, see what is worth pursuing, etc - but it's by far the biggest reason. And that just makes me sad about people in general; they just don't think very much at all beyond their own sphere, which is very immediate in both time and who they know, or what they experience or have experienced.

I guess the whole idea that this is indeed a gynocentric society is not something obvious to people, or something they particularly want to believe. You'd think they wonder about why women are getting married later and having fewer children, or not getting married at all, including most of the daughters of these people. If I had to guess, I'd say that because some men do really well, they just look at those few men, like all women do ...
 
Although there is a mass influx of young men into the Orthodox Church, the young women are not coming, or just a few. My fear is that with this dearth of young women, eventually these men will leave the Church just in order to find a wife. Even though a woman is supposed to follow the man's lead spiritually, most women in the west won't and men and their libidos are weak. We'll see how long this influx trend continues.

At my small church, a couple of the young men are thinking about joining the monastery. They see no future as a husband or father. This is very sad. A couple of the very few young single women at the church also are thinking of joining a monastery. One already did at age 18. One of the priest's daughters...who is very mature way beyond her age...was recently engaged to a young man at the Orthodox seminary. She is just 17 (maturity-wise she's double that age). Woman like that are snatched up immediately. I asked her once where all the young women are, and she responded that they are more interested in New Age, Wicca, and feminism. I told you she was based.

Me, at my age...there are absolutely zero viable and single women in my age bracket. There are a few 10-15 years younger, but they are complete basket cases and I wouldn't get involved. I take that back...there are some at the ethnic parishes, but they won't give you the time of day if you are not from their "home country". It's a tough and lonely road for single Orthodox men. God willing, they can stay the path.
 
Last edited:
Although there is a mass influx of young men into the Orthodox Church, the young women are not coming, or just a few. My fear is that with this dearth of young women, eventually these men will leave the Church just in order to find a wife. Even though a woman is supposed to follow the man's lead spiritually, most women in the west won't and men and their libidos are weak. We'll see how long this influx trend continues.

At my small church, a couple of the young men are thinking about joining the monastery. They see no future as a husband or father. This is very sad. A couple of the very few young single women at the church also are thinking of joining a monastery. One already did at age 18. One of the priest's daughters...who is very mature way beyond her age...was recently engaged to a young man at the Orthodox seminary. She is just 17 (maturity-wise she's double that age). Woman like that are snatched up immediately. I asked her once where all the young women are, and she responded that they are more interested in New Age, Wicca, and feminism. I told you she was based.

Me, at my age...there are absolutely zero viable and single women in my age bracket. There are a few 10-15 years younger, but they are complete basket cases and I wouldn't get involved. I take that back...there are some at the ethnic parishes, but they won't give you the time of day if you are not from their "home country". It's a tough and lonely road for single Orthodox men. God willing, they can stay the path.
Ryan Burge has a lot of religious polling analysis on his Substack. He notes that young men are more religious than young women according to some metrics:

https://www.graphsaboutreligion.com/p/the-religion-of-americas-young-adults
 
Like?

By the way, he is correct on most things but is far too dependent on doom writing for attraction. As we have seen in the past, we are all "right" about what's going on but it happens over periods of time that are much longer than any of us can think or act on, in a certain sense.
I mean it depends upon which globalhomo trait we're talking about; like for example, in tech surveillance, normies using open source software like Signal, Tor, Linux, GPG keys, etc. already nullifies that. For CBDCs, we have parallel cryptocurrency economies (I think Neofeudal despises Crypto from what I remember though). We can scale even beyond that with many other things, including politics.

Now, of course, most people in this world are retarded twats who will affect us in someway, which is most likely why Neofeudal has a black-pilled mindset with his writing style. But if we can learn and adjust our life accordingly, it becomes at least somewhat moot.

Although there is a mass influx of young men into the Orthodox Church, the young women are not coming, or just a few. My fear is that with this dearth of young women, eventually these men will leave the Church just in order to find a wife. Even though a woman is supposed to follow the man's lead spiritually, most women in the west won't and men and their libidos are weak. We'll see how long this influx trend continues.

At my small church, a couple of the young men are thinking about joining the monastery. They see no future as a husband or father. This is very sad. A couple of the very few young single women at the church also are thinking of joining a monastery. One already did at age 18. One of the priest's daughters...who is very mature way beyond her age...was recently engaged to a young man at the Orthodox seminary. She is just 17 (maturity-wise she's double that age). Woman like that are snatched up immediately. I asked her once where all the young women are, and she responded that they are more interested in New Age, Wicca, and feminism. I told you she was based.

Me, at my age...there are absolutely zero viable and single women in my age bracket. There are a few 10-15 years younger, but they are complete basket cases and I wouldn't get involved. I take that back...there are some at the ethnic parishes, but they won't give you the time of day if you are not from their "home country". It's a tough and lonely road for single Orthodox men. God willing, they can stay the path.
There's a lot of mRNA vaccinated women out there though regardless of religious affiliation. So many of these men (assuming they're unvaxxed) are going to be lonely as time progresses.


Honestly, I'm wonder if the Mark of the Beast is just a quasi-darwinian test on people with everything that has occurred so far?
 
Although there is a mass influx of young men into the Orthodox Church, the young women are not coming, or just a few. My fear is that with this dearth of young women, eventually these men will leave the Church just in order to find a wife. Even though a woman is supposed to follow the man's lead spiritually, most women in the west won't and men and their libidos are weak. We'll see how long this influx trend continues.
Do you remember when I posted earlier this year that some of the older priests who I respect would talk about "all the young men coming in", but generally it was in the same way that the rest of society talks about it (they leave out the fact that they have little opportunity and women are preferred legally and socially, and they just focus on the broken parts of families as their reasoning why this is happening)? Well, I brought that up in a fellowship hour after church and a young man or two actually responded that someone had asked what I was getting at a a young men's retreat or some such thing, I recall. The priest who I think knows better - but by the way I don't think anyone wants to fight the culture war, not even Trenham really does this re:feminism - said that either his bishop or another told him that the women "will follow the men" in coming back to the church.

I hate to be cynical or a know-it-all (those of us here just know too much sometimes), but taking that point of view is remarkably cyclical and shows you that the indifference is there. They are willing to not mention something that is important, and basically sacrifice 2 generations, possibly 2.5. Why? There ain't no women coming into the church until this bad boy collapses. So what they are saying, but in a sense aren't aware of it, is that eventually women will come into the church when all the fun and fake money runs out (which is what we've said for a long time). I'm sad to say I don't find that particularly helpful leadership wise. I think the reason I find it fascinating is that it shows you that even with Christian people there is this odd generational indifference at this point in the world. The hard truth is that the only solution left, and this has been clear to me since the mid 2010s, is to seek out women in other places. A dust your sandals off sort of thing. Maybe, though, the crisis is getting exponential right now with all these economic, debt, war and geopolitical scenarios flaring up...
There's a lot of mRNA vaccinated women out there though regardless of religious affiliation. So many of these men (assuming they're unvaxxed) are going to be lonely as time progresses.
We forget about this all the time. I guess it's another way a sane culture, like those in Eastern Europe, might make a comeback.
Honestly, I'm wonder if the Mark of the Beast is just a quasi-darwinian test on people with everything that has occurred so far?
Interesting thought but I doubt it. Since it truly is a type, it does carry a lot of the costs, as we've discussed. Population and fertility, etc are not really all that meaningful in the long term for the christian, who is called to die to himself. I think that's why these cycles happen. It is weird to think that so many things we believe to be "good" though, are a calling that in many ways we have to be OK rejecting if God confronts us with them at crisis periods (family, children, great jobs to make money, etc). Very few want to accept this kind of teaching.
 
I hate to be cynical or a know-it-all (those of us here just know too much sometimes), but taking that point of view is remarkably cyclical and shows you that the indifference is there. They are willing to not mention something that is important, and basically sacrifice 2 generations, possibly 2.5. Why? There ain't no women coming into the church until this bad boy collapses. So what they are saying, but in a sense aren't aware of it, is that eventually women will come into the church when all the fun and fake money runs out (which is what we've said for a long time). I'm sad to say I don't find that particularly helpful leadership wise. I think the reason I find it fascinating is that it shows you that even with Christian people there is this odd generational indifference at this point in the world. The hard truth is that the only solution left, and this has been clear to me since the mid 2010s, is to seek out women in other places. A dust your sandals off sort of thing. Maybe, though, the crisis is getting exponential right now with all these economic, debt, war and geopolitical scenarios flaring up...
We forget about this all the time. I guess it's another way a sane culture, like those in Eastern Europe, might make a comeback.
The older generation in many Christian denominations (I include Millennials as well) grew up and married when women were normal or at least not immediately hostile to men and there was little to no propaganda on the relationship between the sexes; Even Roosh said that 1990 to 2010 was the last "normal era" for finding decent women, which I agree. Many of the Gen Z lads (religious and secular) I've communicated with know this very well and generally don't bother talking unless there's something to gain. My guess is The Passport Bros movement is the advertisement to shake the dust off, but a problem I see with that is those foreign women are compromised as well. If we reflect on the Philippines, Brazil, and other Passport Bro countries, a lot of those women are vaxxed to the max. A few of the women are even talking feminist drivel too. But I suppose the mass-sudden deaths from the vax are a re-balancing of the world.

Interesting thought but I doubt it. Since it truly is a type, it does carry a lot of the costs, as we've discussed. Population and fertility, etc are not really all that meaningful in the long term for the christian, who is called to die to himself. I think that's why these cycles happen. It is weird to think that so many things we believe to be "good" though, are a calling that in many ways we have to be OK rejecting if God confronts us with them at crisis periods (family, children, great jobs to make money, etc). Very few want to accept this kind of teaching.
I meant the outcome of this Mark of the Beast test as a form of punishment for believing the Beast will do whatever to help. In the case of the vaccine as an example, the Leftist were generally pro-vaxxed and now a lot of them are getting sick and dying. Even some of the elite like King Charles fell for it.
 
Even Roosh said that 1990 to 2010 was the last "normal era" for finding decent women, which I agree.
Yes, it's amazing that there has been this much time and still very little on a light at the end of a tunnel to look for (regarding women). The 1990s and early 2000s was possible for making college what high school used to be, but largely the circles I recall had very few example of college "sweethearts." I'd say I know a handful of those, maybe 5% of all people who got married.

What year did Roosh first leave to check out a "foreign" country? I still remember seeing a video of his roughly 12 years ago when I was in professional school and wondering what was going on, how one could have a bright future but so few women were around that were both interested in marriage and good looking. I think what was going on, looking back was that there were women who might get with guys 1.5-2 points above them, but if you think about that, a guy isn't going to commit to that. The problem was that all the 5s and 6s that were guys were never going to get similar girls once careers and college became part of their life realities. Whereas in foreign places, you better get the best guy at 18-20, or definitely "settle" for a similar smv man by age 24-25 or it's over for you regarding serious marriage.
 
Yes, this is another topic on which we are way ahead of the times, which is frustrating to us. We see it so clearly, and I can assure you, I've been to many churches where boomers are pleased and smile when they see all of these "young men coming into the church" but it's like they have never thought about why that's occurring. Like at all. And I'm not saying that they are just coming into the church because they are totally locked out by society to have a future, to get jobs, to have opportunities, see what is worth pursuing, etc - but it's by far the biggest reason. And that just makes me sad about people in general; they just don't think very much at all beyond their own sphere, which is very immediate in both time and who they know, or what they experience or have experienced.

I guess the whole idea that this is indeed a gynocentric society is not something obvious to people, or something they particularly want to believe. You'd think they wonder about why women are getting married later and having fewer children, or not getting married at all, including most of the daughters of these people. If I had to guess, I'd say that because some men do really well, they just look at those few men, like all women do ...
This is called the Apex fallacy. Everyone does it. I do it even. Back in the 1.0 days men would strut their stuff over 60k a year. I’d get jelly beans over those guys and seethe. That was ballin’ pre 2020. I’ve done that and then some as of now, but my life’s worse. Now, you can’t even buy a shack to call your own in real America. You need to live in the provinces to pull that off. Social media and the internet.com has led us to compare ourselves to the top. Ironic you call it gynocentric society though. The women getting these jobs are miserable. Spend some time on TikTok. I feel like the younger men coming into the Orthodox Church will lead the OTHER Great Reset. El Generalisimo might have been onto something. Younger men through syndicalism could possibly reorganize our country from… whatever we’re doing now to an America that keeps its boomer open society, but is Christian, free, and moderate. Undermining, censors, and the “silence is violence” types who tamper with a future Americas “rule of 3” will be stripped of their citizenship and expelled to their country of choice.
 
What's the apex fallacy? The guys going into the church are there because women largely don't care about them, for whatever reasons (certainly young women, if they are even interested). Or are you agreeing that the women are using it (I agree then).

The women getting these jobs are miserable.
All gynocentric means is that they are favored in thought, policy and social interactions (for now). That is a reality in the social and legal aspects of the USA. If any of these people cared about women, of course they would do nothing of the sort. That's why the real agenda is just to take down men - that way you kill two birds with one stone - few have kids.
Undermining, censors, and the “silence is violence” types will be stripped of their citizenship and expelled to their country of choice.
Let's hope.
 


BBVA is the latest financial giant entering the crowded field of stablecoins as the Spanish bank gets set to launch its own digital asset next year with the aid of Visa. In an interview with Fortune, BBVA head of digital assets and blockchain Francisco Maroto said the bank is currently in the sandbox phase of a new Visa program that helps firms launch their own tokenized assets, and wants to reach the prototype phase and live activity by 2025.


BBVA has not yet decided whether the stablecoin will be backed by deposits, money market funds, or fiat currencies such as the euro or U.S. dollar, said Maroto, who added the company plans for it to be used for the settlement layer on exchanges.

BBVA has been working in the digital asset space since 2014, and Maroto hopes that the latest project will let the bank benefit from the growing trend of the tokenization of assets such as real estate and private credit funds. “We realized that blockchain could transform the way we exchange value digitally, and consequently affect the way the financial system works,” Maroto said.

Stablecoin wars​

Stablecoins constitute a broad category in the crypto space, describing any asset intended to maintain a specific price and backed by reserves such as fiat currencies, commodities, or even other cryptocurrencies. While the sector has existed for a decade, dollar-backed stablecoins such as USDC and Tether have exploded in popularity over the past few years, with their backing companies earning hefty profits through the yields on the underlying assets, which typically include U.S. Treasuries and other dollar equivalents.
 
Back
Top