The Epstein Docs

[Shaquilleoatmeal]

So according to this, the correct terminology when talking about a man having sex with a female 13 to 17 would be something like "Pederasts are disgusting sickos, who should be shot", but it would be wrong to call them a pedo?

good question, and it’s important to note the difference between colloquial language and technical language.

Our language has evolved to equate men attracted to teens who have reached sexual maturity as “pedophiles”, which is a word meant for mean who like prepubescent children. The scientific definition is attraction to prepubescent children.

Feminists meanwhile are afraid of competition and want to shame attraction to younger women, so they will claim attraction to fully grown 17 year old girls is some sort of mental illness (and at the same time attraction to men as normal.)

This will have a domino effect of shaming older men being attracted to college aged women (“if you believe 18 year old girls are hot, then you would believe 17 is hot, and thus you’re some pedophile”).

Megyn Kelly is pointing out attraction to teens is not pedophilia, but wrong to act upon, which is a reasonable middle ground, but people don’t like this because it makes it seems less bad to act upon (which it is, but people watch a bunch of Chris Hansen and exposed to “put them in the wood chipper” rhetoric.)

 

[Australia Sucks]

And there is a huge difference between say a 13 year old and a 16 or 17 year old woman. In most parts of the world (including 30 U.S.A. states) sexual intercourse with 16 year olds is legal. Therefore a man in those places who has sex or a relationship with a 16 year old has done nothing wrong (even though it’s socially taboo). 13 years old is definitely in the territory of sick/disgusting and is illegal in the vast majority of countries.

 

[Shaquilleoatmeal]

And there is a huge difference between say a 13 year old and a 16 or 17 year old woman. In most parts of the world (including 30 U.S.A. states) sexual intercourse with 16 year olds is legal. Therefore a man in those places who has sex or a relationship with a 16 year old has done nothing wrong (even though it’s socially taboo). 13 years old is definitely in the territory of sick/disgusting and is illegal in the vast majority of countries.

Correct, the most common AoC is 16, with Europe/USA being 14-18. 13 being deemed illegal is reasonable.

 

[eradicator]

I’m pretty sure just about everything is already scrubbed. Well, everything that could incriminate Israel is already scrubbed.



Honestly, I wish I didn’t know anything, knowing that Israel is a group of satanic sexual blackmailers and manipulating my country’s government, doesn’t really help my day-to-day life, it’s not like I can stop any of them

 

[Psiman]

Honestly, I wish I didn’t know anything, knowing that Israel is a group of satanic sexual blackmailers and manipulating my country’s government, doesn’t really help my day-to-day life, it’s not like I can stop any of them

You can look at it as entertainment.

 

[GrecoRoman]

Bill passed the house and senate, but I may have found the loophole.

“The attorney general can withhold — anything that “would jeopardize an active federal investigation or ongoing prosecution, provided that such withholding is narrowly tailored and temporary.”

So Trump just ordered a new investigation which means, and I hope I’m wrong, they are going to use this exemption to redact a bunch of stuff in there, like anything possibly to do with Trump (explains his 180) or certain Republicans. So we’re going to have to see exactly what is released.

 

[GodfatherPartTwo]

Bill passed the house and senate, but I may have found the loophole.

“The attorney general can withhold — anything that “would jeopardize an active federal investigation or ongoing prosecution, provided that such withholding is narrowly tailored and temporary.”

So Trump just ordered a new investigation which means, and I hope I’m wrong, they are going to use this exemption to redact a bunch of stuff in there, like anything possibly to do with Trump (explains his 180) or certain Republicans. So we’re going to have to see exactly what is released.

You're not the first one to notice this. Even the Democrats understood that the point of the investigation was to defang the actual files. All this voting on their release is nothing but theater. These "investigations" function like a clinch. But the fact that they are voting on them shows what a bald-faced liar Trump is for denying their existence.

 

[Blade Runner]

But the fact that they are voting on them shows what a bald-faced liar Trump is for denying their existence.

Frontman financiers or launderers of money are common in the world. A few are Bill Ackman (Israel), most of the Epstein guys and connections, Trump for RE buys and washing money for all those years from global accounts, etc. Apparently Putin's got a guy too.

The Financial Industrial Complex is real. It controls most things, and the Israel thing is now changing. America going back to their hemisphere. The global order and money changers are moving on (Gulf States and Far East).

 

[Cooper]

 

[Shaquilleoatmeal]

good question, and it’s important to note the difference between colloquial language and technical language.

Our language has evolved to equate men attracted to teens who have reached sexual maturity as “pedophiles”, which is a word meant for mean who like prepubescent children. The scientific definition is attraction to prepubescent children.

Feminists meanwhile are afraid of competition and want to shame attraction to younger women, so they will claim attraction to fully grown 17 year old girls is some sort of mental illness (and at the same time attraction to men as normal.)

This will have a domino effect of shaming older men being attracted to college aged women (“if you believe 18 year old girls are hot, then you would believe 17 is hot, and thus you’re some pedophile”).

Megyn Kelly is pointing out attraction to teens is not pedophilia, but wrong to act upon, which is a reasonable middle ground, but people don’t like this because it makes it seems less bad to act upon (which it is, but people watch a bunch of Chris Hansen and exposed to “put them in the wood chipper” rhetoric.)

@starlight @Mrs TexasJenn

Thoughts on the misuse of the word pedophile?

Should people be misusing the word pedophile to shame large age gaps between adult men and college women? Also is Epstein a true pedophile?

 

[Mrs TexasJenn]

@starlight @Mrs TexasJenn

Thoughts on the misuse of the word pedophile?

Should people be misusing the word pedophile to shame large age gaps between adult men and college women? Also is Epstein a true pedophile?

Epstein was a pedophile. He deceived, confined, and abused children as young as 11 years old, as well as trafficked young children to who knows how many other pedophiles.

Men attracted to post-pubescent women are not pedophiles, and yes, calling them.that is part of the shaming dialogue.

It's natural for men to be attracted to post-pubescent women. It's illegal for them to have sex with women under a certain age, and that's probably a good thing.

And it goes both ways. Women aren't gold diggers or shallow or lazy or whatever for being attracted and feeling safe and protected with men with resources who can provide for them, men with muscles and masculinity who can protect them, men with social competence who can strengthen their network, etc., etc. It's natural for women to gravitate toward these men and it's absurd for jealous men to shame them for it.

 

[Shaquilleoatmeal]

I’m pretty sure just about everything is already scrubbed. Well, everything that could incriminate Israel is already scrubbed.

View attachment 25523

Honestly, I wish I didn’t know anything, knowing that Israel is a group of satanic sexual blackmailers and manipulating my country’s government, doesn’t really help my day-to-day life, it’s not like I can stop any of them

Here’s a hypothetical:

Trump was never in the Epstein files, he didn’t release them in order to make the democrats think he’s a pedo, demand for their release, and then decide to release them in order to do a “I told you so” which makes the democrats look like idiots.

 

[Cooper]

Here’s a hypothetical:

Trump was never in the Epstein files, he didn’t release them in order to make the democrats think he’s a pedo, demand for their release, and then decide to release them in order to do a “I told you so” which makes the democrats look like idiots.

The main reason the Epstein info is being suppressed is that it was an Israeli pedo honeypot blackmail operation, that involved a lot of Jewish billionaires, with figues like Les Wexner financing the operation.

 

[Thomas More]

Here’s a hypothetical:

Trump was never in the Epstein files, he didn’t release them in order to make the democrats think he’s a pedo, demand for their release, and then decide to release them in order to do a “I told you so” which makes the democrats look like idiots.

The whole thing is crazy. The Dems must know there are at least some Democrats on the list, but they think Trump is guilty of something so they attack him. Even though they attack him, they probably act in secret to keep the list from being released.

I think Trump is not actually guilty of any form of pedophile or pederast activities, but there are probably some prominent Republican figures and fundraisers on the list, and he feels he has to suppress the list because he needs them.

I think he should release the list, even though it will take down some of his supporters. He ought to burn the whole corrupt establishment down. However, he must feel that his agenda would end up failing in the chaos that followed such a clean sweep.

 

[Cooper]