^
The Democratic Party
- Thread starter Cynllo
- Start date
That’s got to be a terrible when someone reads your name out loud and you have to be like “present”
In that case, I actually hope Mandami wins, and I hope he gets deported and has his citizenship stripped. That would be interesting.
Accurate. The only thing is, if this girl is a mamdani supporter she’s probably 25 to 30 pounds heavier than her photos indicate anyways. One more reason to stay off of the apps.
Correct, he’s another slick talking Indian scam artist. It’s no different than when someone from India tells a software company in the United States. “how much are you paying your engineers right now $150,000 per year? You hire me I’ll bring an Indian workers that work for you for $40,000 per year. To do the exact same work”
Ensure enough, he brings it 100 of his cousin to come in and then don’t really work and within a year the company is out of business
Last edited:
^He's a coastal liberal, not an FOB, grew up in NYC, went to fancy prep schools and Bowdoin College ($65k annual tuition). That's why he won, he can relate with coastal elites and liberals and push their buttons. As a mayor of NYC, I am not sure if he can do worse than Adams or De Blasio, we're going from corrupt establishment tools to a liberal ideologue.
I’m not sure if any of his tax hikes would pass the assembly, he can definitely do worse if he cuts back on New York City Police Department. For example, if he cuts the New York City police department in half crime will skyrocket
He'll basically do de Blasio 2.0, and I would expect a palpably unfavorable outcome.
Cuomo was backed by Zionist Jews, such as big Orthodox Rabbis. Cuomo said he loved Israel. Mandami was backed by Reform Jews, such as Chuck Schumer. Mandami said he would arrest Netanyahu.
This is yet another instance of Talmuds fighting each other.
For example, Times of Israel was very much against Mandami:
Rabbi Moshe Hauer, vice president of the Orthodox Union, called for Mamdani to “prioritize the safety and security of New Yorkers over his ‘strong feelings about what happens overseas,’” quoting the candidate’s victory speech.
Supporters of New York City Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani cheer as they watch results come in at his primary election party, in New York City, June 24, 2025. (AP Photo/Heather Khalifa)
“The safety of all New Yorkers — including Jewish New Yorkers — is the single greatest responsibility of the Mayor of New York,” Hauer said in a statement. “That safety has been deeply impacted by the rhetoric and actions of those whose opposition to Zionism has driven them to work to instill fear and intimidation in Jews who support Israel. It is time for Mr. Mamdani to move from disturbance to responsibility and to unambiguously reject and [rein] in these actors with whom he has been strongly associated.”
Key Jewish Democratic politicians sounded a starkly different note, embracing the rising progressive star and highlighting shared areas of agreement on domestic issues.
New York Senator Chuck Schumer, the Senate minority leader who likes to call himself the “shomer” (guardian) of Israel, spoke with Mamdani Wednesday and congratulated him on social media.
“I have known [Mamdani] since we worked together to provide debt relief for thousands of beleaguered taxi drivers & fought to stop a fracked gas plant in Astoria,” Schumer posted on X. “He ran an impressive campaign that connected with New Yorkers about affordability, fairness, & opportunity.”
People used to be skeptical of the Reform vs Zionist divide, yet this election made it plain as day. Impossible to deny now. The idea that Talmuds will always back each other is like saying Christians will always back each other or something.
Talmudic Jews historically have been so weakened they were forced to always back each other, but now that they are top dawgs the long knives come out and they start fighting each other with the control they've acquired. Political fragmentation is inevitable for any successful group.
Something I heard has shaped my thinking on this business of "Losing our Democracy". This is one of the big catch phrases you always hear. I have previously always thought this makes no sense. Some Dem gets on TV and says if the Republicans win the election, we will lose our democracy? How can winning an election be equated to losing our democracy?
However, the point I heard this weekend is that the US was formed as a republic, and the founding fathers explicitly avoided actual democracy, because it's been known since antiquity that democracy results in chaos, with the popular masses voting themselves money from the treasury, and allowing every kind of insanity to run free.
But this is exactly what the Democrat party represents. They have ushered in chaos with the gays and the trannies and the mass pharma prescriptions, the mass alien invasion, the destruction of families, the massive increase in government including direct government funded NGOs whose only purpose is to promote this kind of chaos in the US and around the world.
When Dems say we are losing our democracy, they mean they are losing this demented chaos they have created. This kind of chaos is exactly what Democracy has always been expected to produce, and now we have it to the extreme. Losing our democracy is exactly the solution that's needed.
