The Barbarian Invasion of Europe

I honestly don't see any obvious resolution to this issue of the 3rd world invasion of western Europe. It might be necessary to eventually move to a FSU country like Poland/Hungary/Bulgaria? I'm trying to save and invest a bit, but hard when we have an insane tax level. You're very lucky in the US in that regard, it's comparatively easy to build yourself up!

People talk about possible civil wars, but that requires fractions of major institutions in a society. As far as I can see, they don't exists anymore! All the major institutions are compromised and serving the same masters. The contrarian political fractions on the right never gain real power, and now they've started outright banning them! I can't think of any other option than starting to plan for an exit. (and they even have a penalty-tax for that in Norway)
You must live in Canada. 😐
 
Those countries were always a mix of Aryans and the pre-existing population so why were they doing well before and during then they later went into decline?
Aryans brought the area advances in all aspects of life. As the Aryan blood diminished, so too did any advancement.
It is happening in real time right here in Canada.
 
This region (Pakistan, Bangladesh, India, etc) has a lot of history and culture. If you go back thousands of years these people were not exactly mud hut Africans. How come their culture has degraded so much?
Those countries were always a mix of Aryans and the pre-existing population so why were they doing well before and during then they later went into decline?
India is a complex and unique country. While many nations began rebuilding and progressing after World War II, India's path has been markedly different, instead becoming a shitshow clown country.

It's remarkable to consider that India, once a major cultural and political force in Asia alongside China—much like Greece and Rome in the West—now become a joke. How did a civilization known for epic traditions like those of Rama and Sita, Lakshmana, Hanuman, and the Pandavas come to be a land of Pajeet, Rakesh, and Kumar? Fortunately, Cynllo once shared an analysis exploring the reasons behind this insane shift.

But for the Islamic regions, the answer is obvious. Islam corrupted any civilizations where it took hold.

I can't see any good commentary on this, but my guess is a lot of it is to do with the caste system, which has distorted India's IQ distribution.

In feudal times, society was directed by an upper class. And India had and has an intelligent and organised upper-class, which led to it being very productive. It appears that feudal societies slowly increase the IQ of a population over generations. An extended social hierarchy begins to emerge. The caste system guarded the higher levels in a way that led to much larger levels of unskilled and underclass people. There was such a surplus of underclass people in India that over the last two millennia 100s of millions people died in famines. Predominantly from the underclass.

Meanwhile in Europe and Arab areas the classes outside of the landed and ecclesiastical strata were allowed to arrange themselves. So when the feudal system began breaking down in Europe in the 1400s, they revealed that there were plenty of high IQ proto-middle-class people ready to rise through the growing commercial/mercantile society that came to overpower the landed class. As an example you have Isaac Newton, who was born about 150 years after the end of the dominance of the feudal system. He was from an English yeoman family. The yeoman was a feudal rank for a better trained militia man under the fealty of a knight (in turn under a baron, under the king). As the feudal system declined these yeomen transformed from the highest rank of militiaman/peasant to minor land owners. From the Elizabethan period more and more men from this rank became prominent, and they eventually overturned the later end of the landed-feudal class.

In short the European feudal system bred a class of people who were more intelligent, but there was little social mobility to rise. When social mobility opened up, they instantly rose. Meanwhile in India, that class was not created and the barriers to mobility remained in place until living memory. Now those barriers have been removed, we don't see the same rise of the lower caste Indians, because they've been in a 3,000-4,000 year eugenics system that bred them for low skill and low status.

While European countries witnessed the creation of a middle class, India remained under a feudal system for a long time. It didn't have the capability to exit it, as it didn't have the above outlined proto-middle class that Europe did. So instead, the most obvious thing happened - they were invaded again and again, both by the same Turkic-Mongol hordes that invaded Europe and the more technically advanced Muslims. The middle class development in India was imported. But that was a small fraction of the population. The important control of trade (post-feudal) was mostly foreign - Muslim and later European. And from those invasions onwards almost nothing native was contributed to the nation.

I think it's probably this reason why people might view India as a joke. Along with Bangladesh and parts of Pakistan, it's probably the only country in Eurasia with this extreme modification to IQ distribution. So when you travel to those countries, you may find upper class areas, but those areas typically have shacks on the sides of the road, beggars with arms and/or legs cut off. It's not a country that any middle-upper class person is going to see and think - I wouldn't mind living here.

Take other countries in the region - Thailand, Malaysia, Japan, China, Korea. All of them have permanent expat communities. India doesn't have that, as it is not viewed as a desirable place to live. It has one of the worse ease of doing business rating in the world. So it's not surprising that around 25% of Brahmin (high caste) have already left India, mostly in the last generation.
 
use cleaner language, this isn't a game forum
My dream for years was to travel to Europe. I no longer care to go, the disappointment would be too much.


That's no tourist, that's South African pussy magnet vlogger Kurt.

It's interesting how things changed in the hearts of white men, especially from the west. You even got these guys who don't care if they offend their brown audience.

You got retarded whites celebrating pride in Hungary right now, in defiance of the government or whatever, and this video I came across:



Where this faggot can't make up his mind between proving Russia is full of migrants to conservatives [why?] or proving Russians are nazis.

Imagine going to these places and these are the only people that speak English.

Or having to wave off animals when I want to visit a European landmark, I share your sentiment.
 

Eastern Europe still exists. I recommend travelling there for the full European experience.

That said, these Eastern Europeans don't even realise what a hard flex it is to be able to let their primary school age daughters roam the streets alone after midnight, knowing that NOTHING will happen to them.

I can't quite remember when that was possible in western Europe. But I feel as though we were very close to that, if not on par, in the early 2000s.

Edit: another flex I forgot to mention is one regarding restaurant and cafe owners. In EE when their workday ends they simply leave all of the chairs, tables, sometimes even menus and ashtrays outside.

This would be unthinkable in the west. Either A) some migrant will take the stuff home or B) another migrant who collects metal will collect the stuff and trade it for cash.
 
Last edited:
primary school age daughters roam the streets alone after midnight
Episode 5 What GIF by The Office
 
As Shaq said, it does kind of prove my point. I'll still clarify what I mean by roaming the streets. They simply might have friends that live a couple of blocks away. Thus, they'll walk over there to meet up with them after the family dinner.

That's why the playgrounds can be pretty busy late at night. At times they'll take they're younger siblings with them. This is evident because there will be some tiny kid on a bike with training wheels that the older sibling will watch over.

Western kids have that same excess energy, but will have to expend it elsewhere.
 
As Shaq said, it does kind of prove my point. I'll still clarify what I mean by roaming the streets. They simply might have friends that live a couple of blocks away. Thus, they'll walk over there to meet up with them after the family dinner.

That's why the playgrounds can be pretty busy late at night. At times they'll take they're younger siblings with them. This is evident because there will be some tiny kid on a bike with training wheels that the older sibling will watch over.

Western kids have that same excess energy, but will have to expend it elsewhere.

midnight? Are these "daughters" streetwalkers? Maybe after dusk.
 
midnight? Are these "daughters" streetwalkers? Maybe after dusk.
It's the most normal thing ever there. Keep in mind, there's near zero risk of anything happening.

When something does happen, it's mainly actual human trafficking. Those cases get a lot of attention. The last big case happened in Serbia in broad daylight in 2023.

If you're out at night and don't see kids, you're probably not in EE or, as Cooper said, the safe villages/cities of southern Europe.

As far as southern Europe is concerned, I saw this more in southern Italy and southern Spain. Very difficult to pull off in and around Barcelona or Rome.
 
Teens sure but primary school age past midnight? Never in my life, and I've grown up in 100% White areas.

Where you're from, people have dinner at 5-6pm. In France, dinner starts around 8pm, and finishes around 10pm. In Italy, a bit later. In Spain, usually not before 9pm, and often even later. Kids do go out and linger after dinner, hang out with their buddies if they don't have to get up early for school, you see them playing in town squares and neighborhoods late at night after dinner.

 
It's the most normal thing ever there. Keep in mind, there's near zero risk of anything happening.
I have been to safe countries where I have seen teenagers (14+) out after midnight (this even happens in Australia sometimes). But primary school kids? Shouldn't young children have bed times? Its not even a safety issue its more about why are 11 year old kids not sleeping at midnight?
 
Back
Top