Tatted Unmarried-Mother Raises $500,000+ By Saying N-Word

[Samseau]

Is there actual proof that Shiloh Hendrix is as low down as you are insisting? Why assume the benefit of the doubt for a Somalian who was arrested and charged with rape before having the charges dropped, while assuming the worst for a woman who may not be legally married to the father of her children who she's been with for 10 years?

I know as Christians we expect people to forego sex outside of marriage (I'm not going to throw the first stone on that one). Certainly a Christian should wait for marriage to have children, while also not having an abortion if any accidents happen. However, it's a fact that many secular people nowadays are not marrying. Frankly, a woman who stays with a man for 10 years and has a family with him is of higher moral caliber than a guy who has to have rape charges dropped by a liberal DA.

I say let the benefit of the doubt go to her first.

Benefit of the doubt means making assumptions of others without proof? Where is the proof the cameraman is the pedo? You're thinking emotionally, not rationally, which is normally unlike how you go about things Thomas.

The only thing I've assumed about her is that she's not faking this whole thing to make $$$, that's already a very charitable assumption I'll give her in an age of endless online scams.

This has been a pretty big story and for those who've followed it this is common knowledge, but here is the evidence, video attached and linked on X.

This tweet shows there is a Somali Pedo. Is it the same guy who did the filming? What reveals the identity of the man who did the filming, with the identity of the pedo in this tweet?

Zero logical thinking going on here, it's a really bad sign.

Why are we being so charitable to this fella?

Forgive me but seems like you're arguing just to cover your basis here.

Because this is exactly why the right loses so much.

Being sloppy and losing the moral high ground is going to throw away whatever little pet cause we have here at the moment.

Instead of the story being, "Whites defend themselves from cancel culture," it will become, "Whites try to ruin innocent life of father of 3 who defended his neighbor's friend from vicious racial attacks."

So far no one has idea who the man doing the filming is, and yet everyone assumes he's the pedo in some random court case because of some twitter post. That's about the dumbest thing I've ever seen.

This is such a low IQ incident, it really feels like Whites are sinking to the IQ levels of joggers. Behaving so stupidly is not the way to win. This is not going to convince the larger public (remember, I worked in politics for 8 years) and translate a single battle into victory over a larger war.

Seems to me this is retarded like Charlottesville, with lots of rumors going around as fact and it's exactly what the Talmudic Jews want Whites to do. They want them to do something retarded, Hitler style, so they have more ammo to oppress Whites with afterwards.

Whites lose because they have terrible leadership and no plan. Something as simple as proving the identity of the cameraman is turned into an emotional exercise, when it should be a matter of passionless routine.

Again, you should know better in all of these things Choppa as well. Both you and Thomas are letting emotions get the better of you.

There is no reason to make assumptions over the cameraman. The fact he was filming to destroy a woman for language is bad enough, no need to spread lies about him too. That is just going to detract from the larger issue.

 

[Thomas More]

Benefit of the doubt means making assumptions of others without proof? Where is the proof the cameraman is the pedo? You're thinking emotionally, not rationally, which is normally unlike how you go about things Thomas.

The only thing I've assumed about her is that she's not faking this whole thing to make $$$, that's already a very charitable assumption I'll give her in an age of endless online scams.



This tweet shows there is a Somali Pedo. Is it the same guy who did the filming? What reveals the identity of the man who did the filming, with the identity of the pedo in this tweet?

Zero logical thinking going on here, it's a really bad sign.



Because this is exactly why the right loses so much.

Being sloppy and losing the moral high ground is going to throw away whatever little pet cause we have here at the moment.

Instead of the story being, "Whites defend themselves from cancel culture," it will become, "Whites try to ruin innocent life of father of 3 who defended his neighbor's friend from vicious racial attacks."

So far no one has idea who the man doing the filming is, and yet everyone assumes he's the pedo in some random court case because of some twitter post. That's about the dumbest thing I've ever seen.

This is such a low IQ incident, it really feels like Whites are sinking to the IQ levels of joggers. Behaving so stupidly is not the way to win. This is not going to convince the larger public (remember, I worked in politics for 8 years) and translate a single battle into victory over a larger war.

Seems to me this is retarded like Charlottesville, with lots of rumors going around as fact and it's exactly what the Talmudic Jews want Whites to do. They want them to do something retarded, Hitler style, so they have more ammo to oppress Whites with afterwards.

Whites lose because they have terrible leadership and no plan. Something as simple as proving the identity of the cameraman is turned into an emotional exercise, when it should be a matter of passionless routine.

Again, you should know better in all of these things Choppa as well. Both you and Thomas are letting emotions get the better of you.

There is no reason to make assumptions over the cameraman. The fact he was filming to destroy a woman for language is bad enough, no need to spread lies about him too. That is just going to detract from the larger issue.

My apologies, I thought your primary argument was that the pedo rape charges must be considered false if he wasn't convicted. However, you are saying there's no reason to believe Omar is the person who took the video and posted it.

Here he is being interviewed about taking the video and posting it.

CONTINUING COVERAGE: Rochester man speaks out after recording racial slurs against child

The man who recorded a video that went viral this week speaks out after reportedly shooting the video in Rochester involving racial slurs against a child at a park.

www.kttc.com

 

[Samseau]

My apologies, I thought your primary argument was that the pedo rape charges must be considered false if he wasn't convicted. However, you are saying there's no reason to believe Omar is the person who took the video and posted it.

Here he is being interviewed about taking the video and posting it.

CONTINUING COVERAGE: Rochester man speaks out after recording racial slurs against child

The man who recorded a video that went viral this week speaks out after reportedly shooting the video in Rochester involving racial slurs against a child at a park.

www.kttc.com

Finally! Okay this is great proof combined with the tweet. Thank you.

That this guy has a rap sheet plays right into the stereotypes, this makes the mother look like all the better victim here. This is actually very good for the public sphere. I could even see Republicans defending her now.

 

[magoo]

Benefit of the doubt means making assumptions of others without proof? Where is the proof the cameraman is the pedo? You're thinking emotionally, not rationally, which is normally unlike how you go about things Thomas.

The only thing I've assumed about her is that she's not faking this whole thing to make $$$, that's already a very charitable assumption I'll give her in an age of endless online scams.



This tweet shows there is a Somali Pedo. Is it the same guy who did the filming? What reveals the identity of the man who did the filming, with the identity of the pedo in this tweet?

Zero logical thinking going on here, it's a really bad sign.

You are placing a burden proof which is unreasonable. At this moment there are only indiciary evidence. Which is enough to start a criminal investigation. But not for conviction. You want proofs only a conviction can give. And that would be impossible at the moment.

Because this is exactly why the right loses so much.

The right loses because they alienate people with different backgrounds for the other camp. When you fight against an enemy the prisioners you make fight for you. This is basic Sun Tzu.

They also lose because of individualism. And lack of collective thinking.

Being sloppy and losing the moral high ground is going to throw away whatever little pet cause we have here at the moment.

Instead of the story being, "Whites defend themselves from cancel culture," it will become, "Whites try to ruin innocent life of father of 3 who defended his neighbor's friend from vicious racial attacks."

Why was he there?

So far no one has idea who the man doing the filming is, and yet everyone assumes he's the pedo in some random court case because of some twitter post. That's about the dumbest thing I've ever seen.

It´s indiciary evidence. Which is suffice to open an investigation. Not a conviction. But this is not a court.

This is such a low IQ incident, it really feels like Whites are sinking to the IQ levels of joggers. Behaving so stupidly is not the way to win. This is not going to convince the larger public (remember, I worked in politics for 8 years) and translate a single battle into victory over a larger war.

It will send a signal. And this is related to the white kid one black guy killed. Who is also receiving funding. Metcalfe I think.

You worked in politics at what level? Politics is about money. Which gives power.

Seems to me this is retarded like Charlottesville, with lots of rumors going around as fact and it's exactly what the Talmudic Jews want Whites to do. They want them to do something retarded, Hitler style, so they have more ammo to oppress Whites with afterwards.

Yep most likely this is jewish chickanery to start a race war. This comes from 4chan. All this queen talk is also from there. And it´s known since the leak 4chan is a jewish enterprise.

Whites lose because they have terrible leadership and no plan. Something as simple as proving the identity of the cameraman is turned into an emotional exercise, when it should be a matter of passionless routine.

Again, you should know better in all of these things Choppa as well. Both you and Thomas are letting emotions get the better of you.

There is no reason to make assumptions over the cameraman. The fact he was filming to destroy a woman for language is bad enough, no need to spread lies about him too. That is just going to detract from the larger issue.

Nobody is making assumtpions. This is called indiciary evidence.

 

[KulturedKaveman]

First - let’s call her behavior for what it is - white trash. I’m sorry I’m going to say it. She dropped an n bomb on a little kid. And based on the looks of her - she ain’t a classy lady you’re going to have long conversations about art movies music books with … unless it’s slop and I’m sure she’ll talk your ear off then.

What I find more interesting here is the meta narrative. I have to prefix this with “not all” but I think what’s happening is a lot of Euro descendant americas are starting to come to terms with the fact our jogger brethren just don’t like us that much. Once again, not all. I’m sure 70% are reasonable people but 30%… they just don’t like whites. Is what it is. I’m not sure why. We could have gone full on Latin America but we made it very easy for them to live here post 1964. Caribbean and African blacks who came here after 1965 seriously are made of different stuff. You don’t see the same intense dislike of whites. I tried to figure out what’s up and it took looking at other white people to crack the code.

The problem is kicking the dads out of the house and incentivizing all the women to rely on the welfare state. This would lead to unconscious inbreeding and it’s all down hill from there. If this is the state or welfare dependent whites - why not the same for our black siblings? Food for thought. My question is if they don’t like 70% of America, probably even higher if you account for Latin Americans, why ya here? Ghana opened the doors. They’ll take black American immigrants.

 

[Caduceus]

 

[Thomas More]

First - let’s call her behavior for what it is - white trash. I’m sorry I’m going to say it. She dropped an n bomb on a little kid. And based on the looks of her - she ain’t a classy lady you’re going to have long conversations about art movies music books with … unless it’s slop and I’m sure she’ll talk your ear off then.

What I find more interesting here is the meta narrative. I have to prefix this with “not all” but I think what’s happening is a lot of Euro descendant americas are starting to come to terms with the fact our jogger brethren just don’t like us that much. Once again, not all. I’m sure 70% are reasonable people but 30%… they just don’t like whites. Is what it is. I’m not sure why. We could have gone full on Latin America but we made it very easy for them to live here post 1964. Caribbean and African blacks who came here after 1965 seriously are made of different stuff. You don’t see the same intense dislike of whites. I tried to figure out what’s up and it took looking at other white people to crack the code.

The problem is kicking the dads out of the house and incentivizing all the women to rely on the welfare state. This would lead to unconscious inbreeding and it’s all down hill from there. If this is the state or welfare dependent whites - why not the same for our black siblings? Food for thought. My question is if they don’t like 70% of America, proba webly even higher if you account for Latin Americans, why ya here? Ghana opened the doors. They’ll take black American immigrants.

Did she directly call the young scholar a N***R when she found him studying her diaper bag, or did she only say it after being directly challenged on camera by this pedo guy?

 

[Sandalwood Peak]

This is such a low IQ incident, it really feels like Whites are sinking to the IQ levels of joggers. Behaving so stupidly is not the way to win. This is not going to convince the larger public (remember, I worked in politics for 8 years) and translate a single battle into victory over a larger war.

This "low IQ incident" is happening because an immigrant decided to film a native, for using a slur in her own country. This woman was quickly doxed by who knows who, so as to rally a lynch mob. It is a lynch mob because people literally advocate violence for the crime of racism. This incident deeply resonates with a lot of people all over, including media and various organizations wishing to bring the incident even further light, seemingly indifferent to any consequences for her from all this publicity.

Technically, the only "low IQ" part of all this is the fact that a park exchange between two randoms is a national story.

Yet we both know the reason this is a national story is not because people have nothing better to do, but it's part of a larger campaign by other races, including a lot of white people, in policing white individuals [in this case she's not an individual but a representative of the race] "stepping out of line" for things that are not even crimes. Just contemplate how insane that is. This is assuming these individuals want her "re-educated", not be the subject of the worst possible humiliation ritual [most likely].

You seem to imply the woman is at fault. At fault for what? Bringing bad publicity to white people or hurting the feelings of children? There's no reason I should even know about this. Not to mention you imply whites are superior to blacks in IQ. So in your perspective is she a corrupted white undeserving of the Aryan title? What was the point of mentioning her race? I don't understand people using racial language while claiming they don't believe in race, as whites love to do. We're all individuals until one of us is a jerk? In that spirit, what is this war you speak of? The war to make multiculturalism work by any means necessary?

 

[Samseau]

Did she directly call the young scholar a N***R when she found him studying her diaper bag, or did she only say it after being directly challenged on camera by this pedo guy?

Yes, it's both in the opening video:

"Did you call him a n*****?"
"Yeah, what if he acts like one... he took my son's stuff."

and in her give send go she says, "I called him [the boy] out for what he was."

Put together both heavily implied that she did.

 

[KulturedKaveman]

Did she directly call the young scholar a N***R when she found him studying her diaper bag, or did she only say it after being directly challenged on camera by this pedo guy?

Yeah, hence the viral moment. Why the guy started filming. He was looking for a quick pay day and to go viral.

 

[magoo]

The error she might have made in a bad day is completely disproportionate to the consequences she suffers. It´s complete harrassment. And public stalking and humiliation. They do not seek legal justice. But mob justice. They do not seek equal retribution. But complete destruction. What they do is illegal. He has eventually the right to record it. And send it to the competent criminal proceedings. Not make it a tool of mob vengeance.

What she did was wrong. She had a really bad moment. But to destroy her? Which is what he wants. Is absurd. The power of social media is absurd.

Trump was in fact one of the guys who said I don´t care. Give me all you got. Make it the best smear campaign. And the people which is the ones who decide. Said they also don´t care. The media the courts are less powerful than the people. Unfortunately he has too much jews around him.

Courts ultimately enact justice in the name of the people granted minimal constitutional rights for minorities based in natural law. They cannot go against the people. Unless people are violating basic rights. If they do they are acting against the people. A court doesn´t act according to it´s free will. They act according to the will of the people enshrined in laws limited by natural law. The will of the people is only limited by natural law.

And this has to be contained unless it spreads to the rest of the west. We are already in deep shit has it is.

 

[Thomas More]

Yeah, hence the viral moment. Why the guy started filming. He was looking for a quick pay day and to go viral.

I suppose it is not Christian of me to use that word, although I have thought it or muttered it under my breath a few times.

I don't accept that blacks get to rule it out of bounds. There are hurtful slurs for everybody else, but somehow blacks can act very poorly, and yet they expect to be free of criticism or name calling.

If they would clean up their act they'd get a lot less blowback. I'm glad to see the support for this young mother in this situation, and I don't care if she did say it.

 

[eradicator]

Why was he there?

The man in this story is part of or perhaps organizing a Somali rape and pedophile gang. Of course he’s at a park

I don’t really have any answers to the rest of your questions as I am curious as well

 

[LaAguilaNegra]

Yeah, hence the viral moment. Why the guy started filming. He was looking for a quick pay day and to go viral.

He's a pedo lingering around public playgrounds with minors under his guardianship ripping belongings of other visitors.

You're gaslighting, and you seem very eager to brush up the public image of this individual, whilst simultaneously very eager to slander the public image of the lady in question - mentioning irrelevant and false details about family situation, tattoos and whatnot.

 

[Read_Lives_of_Saints]

Yes, it's both in the opening video:

"Did you call him a n*****?"
"Yeah, what if he acts like one... he took my son's stuff."

and in her give send go she says, "I called him [the boy] out for what he was."

Put together both heavily implied that she did.

She was being defiant to the Somali pedo rapist aggressor and refusing to concede anything without making an admission.

When Omar made a tacit admission in the first vid with him, you said it was poor logic to assume, but you assume it readily when there is the same uncertainty with regard to Shiloh, who was not in the safety of her bed as Omar was when he made his tiktok.

 

[LaAguilaNegra]

Generally speaking White Americans, as a rootless people, have been de-racialized and lost their instinct to collectively fight for survival. Ergo it's refreshing to see that these deeprooted suicidal group tendencies are showing signs of letting up, and are getting readjusted to face the reality that your enemies group you together, hate you hence you might as well act towards it. Some parts of the younger generation are slowly withdrawing from the auto-masochist colorblind moobments where the only commonality allowed is based on sports teams, political allegiance and fav negro rapper.

Admittedly the changes are still in the very early stages but it's a start, and maybe in 15-20 years an Amerikaner ethnogenesis will take place and the White Americans, like the Afrikaners, will start inhibiting a sense of pride and belonging in their ethnic and cultural background.

 

[PurpleUrkel]

This has been a pretty big story and for those who've followed it this is common knowledge, but here is the evidence...

You don't have any "evidence." You don't know this woman. She is not coming forward with full disclosure of her history with a recap of events from her perspective. All we have is the video where she:

1.) Admits to calling a black child a n*gger for allegedly stealing something from her unattended shoulder bag (again, there is not one shred of proof that this even happened or that it happened in the way she claims it did).

2). Calls a black man who is bigger and stronger than her and who is filmming her a n*gger.

3). She does all of this in front of her toddler without hesitation showing a disregard for her child's safety.

4). Starts a Give Send Go page asking for 50K with a selfie as her profile pic with a pure trolling victim statement of: "Help me protect my family... I have been put in a very dire situation" (notice there is no accountability on her part) which has now been increased to a million dollar funding goal. Zero humility in all of it. Not one "I blew it and lost my temper and could use your help cleaning up this mess that I created for myself and my young children."

In addition, we have no proof that she did not doxx herself. What, someone got her license plate number and ran her tags? What is this a 1970's episode of Rockford Files where normies can run tags?

There are so many loose ends to this story yet you insist on coming after me personally instead of addressing my argument(s) which are based in part on "two wrongs don't make a right." Just because George Floyd and Karmelo Anthony were in the wrong doesn't mean Shilou Hendrix is in the right. Just like many women, she made a series of emotionally charged bad decisions and got herself into a dangerous situation and now requires men to bail her out. Classic entitled, feminist, boss babe behavior.

I don't think you have any experience or knowledge about threat assessment or dealing with difficult situations like these because your take here is completely wrong.

Yeah, you seem to have a lot of "thoughts" on things in which you are clueless about.

How is it that you know that you can handle yourself physically?

Because unlike your girl "Shilou" I'm 6'3" 220 with a history of violence.

She was being defiant to the Somali pedo rapist aggressor and refusing to concede anything without making an admission.

Bullsh*t. Again, you have no way of knowing any of this. "She was being defiant," how do you know what she was thinking? I say she was being a reactionary feminist retard thinking that she was safe in talking sh*t to a man who could have easily knocked her teeth out, taken her infant, and done who knows what with it.

And then we have others here claiming that this clown world soap opera has somehow "shifted The Overton Window" which of course is complete nonsense. Nothing has changed because the jews causing all of this racial division and non-white immigration are still at the helm of western "civilization." This whole fiasco will soon be memory holed and it will be on to the next new thing.

 

[Read_Lives_of_Saints]

Urkel, you're all over the place and missing things that have been well covered.

You think she doxxed herself? That's not how the timeline unfolded and the very soy, black, Somali, pedo rapist has said so on video for the local news.

Anyway, I apologize for making this personal or about you.

 

[Samseau]

First - let’s call her behavior for what it is - white trash. I’m sorry I’m going to say it. She dropped an n bomb on a little kid. And based on the looks of her - she ain’t a classy lady you’re going to have long conversations about art movies music books with … unless it’s slop and I’m sure she’ll talk your ear off then.

What I find more interesting here is the meta narrative. I have to prefix this with “not all” but I think what’s happening is a lot of Euro descendant americas are starting to come to terms with the fact our jogger brethren just don’t like us that much. Once again, not all. I’m sure 70% are reasonable people but 30%… they just don’t like whites. Is what it is. I’m not sure why. We could have gone full on Latin America but we made it very easy for them to live here post 1964. Caribbean and African blacks who came here after 1965 seriously are made of different stuff. You don’t see the same intense dislike of whites. I tried to figure out what’s up and it took looking at other white people to crack the code.

The problem is kicking the dads out of the house and incentivizing all the women to rely on the welfare state. This would lead to unconscious inbreeding and it’s all down hill from there. If this is the state or welfare dependent whites - why not the same for our black siblings? Food for thought. My question is if they don’t like 70% of America, probably even higher if you account for Latin Americans, why ya here? Ghana opened the doors. They’ll take black American immigrants.

I agree with you, but no one is trash. Her behavior is trashy, but she is not trash. No one is trash, we all are created in the image of God.

 

[Read_Lives_of_Saints]