ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com
@budoslavic - the irony is that right wing jews like Glenn Beck and James Lindsay/Peter Boghossian are trying to get ahead of the Overton Window and tell us that the Cloward-Piven strategy is something that is being deployed by "Leftists" or "Socialists" or "Communists"
AND YET - the Best summary of the Cloward-Piven strategy was Right wing, Zionist, Likudnik jew.. Binyamin Netanyahu himself.
There's a video of him somewhere on the net where he sits in an Israeli women's apartment and answers her fears about what America might do to thwart Israeli plans at home. I paraphrase but he basically says "America is ours, it belongs to us, we will chop it up, consume it and suck it dry by turning it into the world's largest welfare state, which will be its doom.. its what we do to all our enemies.."
Funny how people like Lindsay, Beck, Boghossian aren't mentioning that little clip.
The destruction of America via the Cloward-Piven strategy seems to be more of a bi-partisan jewish project between left wing and right wing jews than any supposed (((Leftist))) (((Communist))) strategy.
@Samseau - you mention Town Halls where the residents' valid concerns are just ignored and passed over. Stonewalled.
Yep that's the approach of the puppets that rule over us.
There was a Town Hall in the South of England where locals were being badly affected by the boatloads of migrants crossing the English Channel under British Govt policy. One particular campaigner stood up and eviscerated the assembled MPs and took out all their excuses before they could answer.
Their response?
Fake smiles and glazed expressions all round and they ... just ignored everything he said and then pretended that the questions and evisceration never happened. Gaslighting.
Same thing with Kamala and ABC laughing off the Springfield situation as 'fake news' ha ha ha... ... ha. Gaslighting.
This is nothing new. After the second World War, and the giving away of Britains technology and Intellectual Property plus the entire Empire, the jews who ran the UK set about empowering communist gangs across Africa to justify giving away Commonwealth African possessions to their favourite catspaw, violent Marxists.. (The jews would then rule as a shadow government via their mining company boardrooms)
Well the actual leaders of African society were the traditional tribal leaders who didn't understand the appearance of these new-fangled champagne swilling jews as they were previously used to dealing with, for better or worse, traditional British Empire administrators.
The traditional leaders said to the jews "We represent the will of our people, not yourl little pet murder gangs"
"In June—July of 1964 Mr. Ian Smith arranged for twenty-nine senior chiefs to visit many countries of the strange, new world. They were received with ceremony by the Pope in Rome and by Ministers in India, but the British Prime Minister refused to see them and they achieved only two half-hours with Mr. Duncan Sandys, (Winston Churchill's gay jewish son in law who spent the Weimar years having sex with boys in Berlin) , who told them that in London’s opinion the “African nationalists” had the "following" of the people. The chiefs pointed out that whatever following these had came out of intimidation by murder and arson.
Mr. Sandys intimated that methods did not concern him, he was satisfied that they had the following.
Thereon the chiefs said they were law-abiding people but by calling out their impis they could soon show who were the true leaders.
Mr. Sandys at once retreated, with the familiar cry of “no violence”:
- on all these occasions the chiefs were told that “a following” produced by violence had already been “demonstrated” by the murder gangs,
- but that they must not demonstrate their own following by replying to violence with counter-violence."
Two-Tier. Sound familiar?
There was a similar meeting with another British croney apparatchik Left wing MP Bottomley (whose daughter became a Conservative cabinet member years later)
"
To the (tribal leaders), Mr. Bottomley was a hostile and incomprehensible figure:
to him, they were slippery customers who would not stand up to questions about “ballots” and “votes”.
From first to last Mr. Bottomley ignored every reference to what was the very root of the matter: the terror in the kraals (in the bush).
At the end, when one chief personally asked him, “What do you want? If you want us to demonstrate our following, let us call out our impis and restore law and order”, Mr. Bottomley patted his shoulder and said something which sounded like, “Oh, Oi pray yew, no violence”.
The meeting was then quickly wound up, and its hopelessness became clear."
Those are the words of Douglas Reed, a veteran international correspondent, who went on to say:
"
Kipling was right: when two strong men stand face to face they can understand each other, no matter what their skin or language. Therefore between someone such as Mr. Bottomley and these tribal leaders no communion of minds was possible. "
@PurpleUrkel You mention, quite rightly, that there isn't even accurate reporting anymore as to (quoting the Donald) "what the heck is going on.."
The Left and the Right live in totally different echo chambers.
I talk to a left wing Californian acquaintance of mine every now and then about American politics and he just comes out with a blizzard of words and abstract concepts that don't even make recognisable sense to me.
But you see - what I perceive is the world, including America, being subjected to "pre-revolutionary" conditions, the set up for the Fall.
9-11 just went by and in another time (before 2001) Left Wingers would have told you how it marked the anniversary of a CIA coup in Chile in 1973 where the happy little Chilean left-wing Ewoks were beaten up, imprisoned and generally massacred by .. checks notes.. the CIA and "Fascists"TM.
They leave a lot out.
President Salvador Allende's cousin, Isabel Allende, wrote an autobiography that touched on this.
As his cousin and a Loonie Leftie she got a position in his Santiago government. Tellingly, in her book she says that "
many (not Fascists necessarily)
complained about the soaring inflation, breakdown in law and order and a generalised feeling of Chaos .. but for us on the Left it was such a dynamic and exciting time!"
Well, lets look at that "exciting time" again shall we?
Here's another rendering of what happened to Chile under Allende:
"
The Marxist government of Salvador Allende in Chile
- altered the constitution,
- implemented collectivization of land,
- and began to take over, nationalise and "collectivise" industry.
At the same time, various armed revolutionary groups and militias operated in the country. The most prominent of these groups was the Movimiento de Izquierda Revolucionaria (MIR), a leftist revolutionary organization that sought to overthrow constitutional government and establish instead a socialist state.
The MIR engaged in armed terror and sabotage.
Other leftist militant groups and armed factions also operated in Chile. The guidance and support of all this came from Cuba and the USSR.
The terrorism of these secret armies and revolutionary groups, along with the collapse of the economy, constituted the "pre-revolutionary stage" which Marxists aimed to create. (Pre-Bolshevik Russia anyone? Where they emptied the jails? Modern America anyone?)
Unfortunately for them, on September 11, 1973, a coup d'état by General Augusto Pinochet and the Chilean military brought a sharp and bitter end to all attempts to turn Chile into a failed communist state like Cuba."
From another source;
"
The Grand Orient Freemason Lodge in Paris was also behind the campaign directed against Augusto Pinochet, the military leader of Chile, since he had caused the death of the masonic brother Salvador Allende.
Allende became a freemason in 1935, in the lodge Progreso No. 4 in Valparaiso. Long before he was elected president, his grandfather had already been a high level Freemason.
The Grand Orient of France on 3 November 1998 demanded justice be meted out to Pinochet. He was officially accused of having ordered the murder of 3000 left-wingers (many of whom were actually terrorists).
At the same time, the media kept quiet about the fact that Pinochet thereby saved the lives of hundreds of thousands of countrymen, who were on the death lists of these Marxist terrorists. Is it not right to kill madmen who murder innocent people, thereby saving many more? Police officers also have the right to return fire in order to defend themselves and the public.
According to the Grand Orient, Augusto Pinochet did not have this right, and they established close contacts with criminal gangs smuggling arms and drugs into Chile."
Interesting that archaic quote about Police being able to shoot back in self-defence.
We all remember the violence and chaos of the BLM Summer of 2020 and how the politicians all lined up behind "Defund the Police" and knee-jerk changed the patrol officers' rules of engagement so that they could no longer adequately defend themselves. The criminals could use Force - but shame on you Mr Police Officer/(Mr African Tribal Leader) if you do the same..
Bibi's Cloward Piven strategy in America
Alphabet Agency Murder gangs in 1960s Southern Africa
Marxist Terrorists in 1973 Chile
Antifa Black Bloc in BLM 2020
1000s of Haitians in 2024
All expressions of the Pre revolutionary stage.
America and the West are being readied for their Fall..