Signs of Escalation Into A World War
- Thread starter Ember
- Start date
Caduceus
Heritage
These days "60% Norwegian" can mean 30% Muslim.
It is extremely unlikely there are any brown people that far north, unless they are Inuit's or something. I would also reasonably guess it is impossible for 99.999999% of Blacks to survive in such a climate.
Lawyers are heavily being recruited in Europe for the national defense departments regarding labor law for future recruitment of personnel. And actually really well paid jobs. Sent one to a friend of mine.
They are also launching programs to rehabilitate and build future army facilities.
They are also launching programs to rehabilitate and build future army facilities.
@MusicForThePiano really does not read like either AI or plagiarism. A lot of what he writes is very well constructed.
Various members here just can't bear his viewpoint and are envious of his writing skills.
I hope he also publishes elsewhere where it gets the respect he deserves rather than being blamed for creating walls of text
There were some nutters on RVF who put out unintelligible walls of text but it's not comparable.
Caduceus
Heritage
No.
Wow....really going for broke on the fear mongering useful idiot propaganda there aren't they.
I assume it's just instructions on how to make white flags out of common household objects.
I joke
Last edited:
Here:
"Cela ne vise «absolument pas» à préparer la population à la perspective d'une guerre, contrairement au cas suédois, assure le SGDSN."
www.lefigaro.fr
They are denying the booklet is meant for war event. So coming from a politician mouth. When they deny something it means the opposite so it´s meant for a war event.
Enlisting in a military as a reservist is also advised it seems. Hahahaha. Dying for jews. No thanks.
Germany revoked a debt limit to start creating debt for military. I don´t remember the exact figure but I think it´s 1T. A lot of money for the merchants of death running around.
www.bbc.com
"Cela ne vise «absolument pas» à préparer la population à la perspective d'une guerre, contrairement au cas suédois, assure le SGDSN."
Un manuel de survie en cas de crise majeure va être distribué aux Français
Le gouvernement va envoyer prochainement à la population un livret qui détaille les pratiques à adopter en cas de crise, allant d’un accident industriel, un événement climatique grave et jusqu’au conflit armé.
www.lefigaro.fr
They are denying the booklet is meant for war event. So coming from a politician mouth. When they deny something it means the opposite so it´s meant for a war event.
Enlisting in a military as a reservist is also advised it seems. Hahahaha. Dying for jews. No thanks.
Germany revoked a debt limit to start creating debt for military. I don´t remember the exact figure but I think it´s 1T. A lot of money for the merchants of death running around.
Germany votes for historic boost to defence and infrastructure spending
The move alters the German constitution, allowing the country to increase its military spending.
www.bbc.com
Last edited:
Proverbs 18:2 “A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but only in expressing his opinion.”
Proverbs 26:12 “Do you see a man who is wise in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.”
Proverbs 14:6 “The mocker seeks wisdom and finds none, but knowledge comes easily to the discerning.”
You claim to break down long books and complex ideas into short sentences for conversation, but in doing so you amputate instead of clarify. You reduce multi-faceted arguments to simplistic phrases which may make them more digestible to you but at the cost of stripping away their essential meaning. That is not a skill. That is an intellectual failure.
Your wikipedia link to obscurantism is an attempt at a sleight of hand, a rather vague accusation in place of an actual counterargument. Obscurantism is the deliberate use of vagueness to mislead or prevent understanding. I do the opposite I provide detailed, structured arguments that demand engagement. That you find depth inconvenient does not make it obscure it simply means you are unwilling or unable to engage with material at the level it requires.
In reality it is you who practices a form of obscurantism, a rather sophomoric reductionist obscurantism by insisting that all complex subjects must be compressed into short sentences. In doing so you create intellectual blind spots distorting rather than revealing truth. A true thinker refines arguments without losing substance. It is not clarity to remove substance completely.
You demand that everything be shrunken to your level of comprehension and then dismiss anything more rigorous as ‘obscure’ or ‘poor writing.’ Knowledge does not owe anyone brevity and historical truths do not cater to one's preferred sentence length.
I do not write for those who need their ideas spoon-fed. I write for those who are willing to think. If you are frustrated by that, the failure is not in my writing it is in your reading. Clearly you are intelligent and capable of understanding complex topics, but you arrive at foregone conclusions too quickly for some of the more detailed ones. That kind of philosophy is not applicable for everything in our existence, though it has its place.
Philosophy provides frameworks for thought but for example when it comes to fields like molecular biology, elliptic curve cryptography, terahertz antennas, even historiography, abstract reasoning alone is insufficient. These disciplines require rigorous data collection, mathematical models, computational simulations, and experimental validation none of which fit within the confines of simplistic aphorisms or millennia-old rhetoric.
In regards to this thread it could be simplified or expanded either way, there is too much confusion in geopolitics right now and that is all by design. Understanding the jewish hand in world events is already knowing a majority of what comes next. It is better to pray, study, and dig deeper into all subjects so no one is confused at what militarized changes come out of left field tomorrow.
I rarely post in the surface-level threads, if people want to come for a detailed engagement they know I'm usually in the deep forum, and for the many who have reached out to me, I always reply in kind.
Last edited:
europe has the moral high ground they said
"Physician, heal thyself."
If you can't summarize a complex topic then you don't understand it. Sorry if the truth hurts but that's the reality. With greater understanding comes greater simplicity. That doesn't make it shallow, it just means greater mastery.
True in virtually every subject, for example take physics. General Relativity is simpler than Newtonian Mechanics which in turn is simpler than Aristotelian elements.
You hide behind walls of text with a veneer of wisdom, you are literally the person the proverbs are describing. You completely fail to understand your own shortcomings.
"The simple believe anything, but the prudent give thought to their steps."- Proverbs 14:15
"The beginning of wisdom is this: Get wisdom. Though it cost all you have, get understanding." - Proverbs 4:7
The idea that simplicity equals mastery is a fallacy. True mastery of a subject isn’t about reducing complexity to fit a comfort zone it pursues understanding the depth and nuance that simplicity cannot capture. The greatest thinkers didn’t simplify the world they explored it deeply and uncovered layers. To truly comprehend a subject is to accept its intricacies not squeeze what you can of them into a bottle of oversimplification.
This is the exact line of thinking that brought the US down in education compared to other countries. This is lowering the bar not raising it. The dumbing down of complex subjects into overly simplistic slogans has crippled western educational systems. It’s an unfortunate trend that seeks comfort and immediacy over challenge and rigor. Instead of fostering critical thinking and deep analysis they encourage students to memorize and regurgitate easy answers. Answers that are built on vestigial concepts and lies in many of the subjects. Just like unpacking history presents problems for all of these narratives, so too will be the removal of teeth in changing the education system away from the simpleton's grasp. If you promote this as mastery, look where that "mastery" has gotten everyone.
Children are especially severely handicapped in their growth by the dopamine-driven need for simplicity. This mindset driven by instant gratification has led to the destruction of countless lives through sin and bad habits. It parallels the seeking of simplicity in every aspect of life. For millennia not everyone became a philosopher or scholar nor did all in the Medieval period immerse themselves in the trivium and quadrivium. Forcing complexity on everyone is just as wrong as forcing simplicity. Some are made for one, others for the other. This is why societies had peasantries, nobility, and experts retained by monarchies. Growth thrived when discipline and complexity were respected, those who lacked the drive remained in duncedom, while those with the will to learn endured rigorous and complex training.
No, that’s far from accurate. What’s peddled in today’s academic indoctrination centers is nothing more than cookie-cutter affirmative-action physics designed for mass consumption rather than intellectual growth.
You’re mistaken on the simplicity scale. General Relativity is not simpler than Newtonian Mechanics it’s more complex because it describes gravitational forces in extreme conditions where Newton’s model fails, which is also why it is suspect from deeper analysis. Newtonian Mechanics remains a valid approximation for everyday situations but General Relativity is more comprehensive in explaining how space-time behaves under the influence of massive bodies (as an abstraction). Aristotelian Physics was replaced because it was considered inaccurate and unable to account for observable phenomena not because it was overly complex. Physicists rightly moved away from it in favor of models that were based on empirical evidence. So the scaling becomes more complex from antiquity to the present in that subject.
General Relativity is ultimately jewish dogma dressed in mathematical sophistication, heaped upon us by a vitriolic bolshevik pseudo-intellectual thieving fraudster and promoted by those who benefit from its convenience not its truth. A far more insightful view was offered by the greatest Serbian Orthodox Christian physicist:
"The Theory of Relativity is a beggar wrapped in purple whom ignorant people take for a king and a mass of error and deceptive ideas violently opposed to the techniques of great men of science of the past and even to common sense. The theory wraps all these errors and fallacies and clothes them in magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. Its exponents are very brilliant men but they are metaphysicists, rather than scientists. Not a single one of the relativity propositions has been proved." – Nikola Tesla, 1934.
Tesla understood that just because a theory is draped in elegant equations doesn’t mean it’s correct. Though General Relativity is considered revolutionary it remains unproven in many ways. It may have refined aspects of Newtonian mechanics but it has not replaced them especially in contexts where Newton's laws still hold strong.
A theory that cannot be universally reproduced or consistently validated by experiments is not a mark of mastery but a signal that more exploration is needed. Real mastery doesn’t lie in chasing mathematical beauty but in finding consistent verifiable truth.
"The heart of the discerning acquires knowledge, for the ears of the wise seek it out." - Proverbs 18:15
I do not deny that I have shortcomings, but it is not in the pursuit of knowledge. I have made many mistakes in my life, who here has not? The simpleton seeks simplicity in all things, and when he does not find it, he reduces complexities to erroneous conclusions. There is always truth beneath the depths. I don't take you for a simpleton, and my responses should show you that I know you capable of reading much. In matters of communication between two people, simplicity has its uses, but in intellectual pursuits it does not.
I don't know what you think I'm hiding in my detailed responses either. If asked to explain myself I always do so. If you want summaries only, then that is going to be difficult depending on the subject matter. I will try to accommodate that, since you have highlighted its importance to you. I am considerate after all.
I'm sure you are well-versed on some significant subject matter, but your philosophical approach reveals your own methods are not steeped in learning for yourself what is, and what isn't, merely chasing a summarization even if the summarization isn't correct. Experts don't do this. You never give anyone a reason why you are an authority, you simply state "I know what is good." Then when pressed to explain yourself you repeat again on simple being superior when it is clearly not in most of the subjects discussed here. I never claim to be an authority, I am merely one voice and mind of many along the conduit of searching for truth among the lies.
Bro, you gotta ease up on this stuff.
There's only one way to prove these bold personal claims. We must hold the first annual Christ Is King Oddyssey Of The Mind Summer Games where members settle their intellectual and philosophical beefs in person via history debates, speed chess, IQ off's, vehicle building, and technical, classical, structural, performance, and jiu jitsu challenges.
Personally I can't wait to wipe the floor with Blade Runner in a renatra fusca creativity challenge while submitting It_Is_My_Time with a choke hold.
What! No arm wrestling?
