Besides the obvious prayer and fasting, he should try ivermectin. Heard it does wonders with cancer patients...
Scott Adams Thread
- Thread starter Thomas More
- Start date
Besides the obvious prayer and fasting, he should try ivermectin. Heard it does wonders with cancer patients...
Yes, he tried ivermectin, but it was likely well after he already had had bone metastases. If it even works, it wouldn't work at that stage.
His belief in Western science and medicine is what's killing him. Those beliefs, in combination with the obvious bitter hatred he buries deep inside is what is consuming him and will lead to his death in a couple of months. If he took the heuristic position: don't trust what modern scientists and doctors say about cancer, instead of working all of his analytics to come to the wrong conclusion, he'd be fine. I notice also the man who analyzed so much will die from a disease that began near his anus.
I'm not really sure what you are saying. We don't live in a paradise. Many people who have gotten "cancer" recently are younger people that can attribute it to a poor decision with the injections, but many people in the past who were even holy (St. Nektarios for example) had prostate cancer and died, ultimately, from it.
I'm open to many things and everyone knows I was avidly anti covscam/injections, but I'm pretty honest about the history of medicine, and of course that basically means western medicine in recent history, which solved much suffering and led to longevity for many, many people, regardless of the current biases one might have.
At least he admitted he was wrong. Very few people can do that. Kudos. May he live for next 100 years.
There is also multiple protocols on Telegram using different methods - namely the CDS protocol which involves enemas and mega-dosing CDS (Chlorine Dioxide Solution) along with fasting and prayers.
Many people have written testimonies of healing themselves from all different forms of cancer.
But he may be too far gone, I don't know.
You are correct about modern medicine, its just death - slow or fast you can take your pick
I think that many of these treatments can be of use earlier in the progression of a cancer. However, once it has metastasized widely and is well into Stage 4, I don't think any of these alt treatments offers a cure that will save someone's life.
Adams is saying he expects to die in a few months, and is already in severe pain. I don't think any medical treatment could actually heal him. It could extend his time of living with severe cancer, and that's it.
Adams is saying he expects to die in a few months, and is already in severe pain. I don't think any medical treatment could actually heal him. It could extend his time of living with severe cancer, and that's it.
Last edited:
Ultimately, it is his sin that is causing his soon-to-be death. I find it ironic the method in which he is dying as it is linguistically related to how he spent his life, and it is also the result of his exposure to the vaccines (an assumption, but no doubt), something he was so worked up over, and even when he said the anti-vaxxers were right, it sounded like a bitter secret-king not actually acknowledging they might be smarter than him, but only that their caveman methodology happened to work.
As I understand it from reading the book 'Cancer is Not a Disease', cancer is the body's last ditch effort to save itself when the immune system stops working. I think, as per a scientist Tucker Carlsen interviewed, the vaccines Scott took ruined his immune system. Were he to have his immune system intact I don't think he'd die as rapidly as he is now, however none of us escapes the wages of sin in the physical sense. I also think belief makes a difference. When one fully buys into what modern medicine says about cancer and cancer treatment, you are now a slave to the ideas scientists came up with, through power of suggestion and the weight we put on authority. It was medical authority Scott put his trust in that has led to his health problems, when he may have circumvented it and delayed his death had he never bought into the authority of the cancer industry.
I also don't fully buy into the history of western medicine, as some of the initial rejections of germ theory seemed to have made good points, and I don't think the birth of vaccines and later on the dominance of Pasteur are as important as they once seemed.
Yes, he was 39 there.
I have several counters to this idea of sin being directly related to what's going on; I wouldn't be so simple. Bader Ginsburg was given many years to live. Jimmy Carter lived with mets until age 99 or some ridiculous age. I do agree that his admission that he was wrong wasn't really coming fully clean, since he acted like people who identified the lies were just doing so because they "didn't trust the government." For some that's true, but for a lot of people they understand the disease, the history, the claims and the physiology, which were all clearly lies from the beginning. I was one of them. By the way, some listened to me if they didn't have that capacity, for various reasons, and some (even many family members, extended mostly) didn't.
That is correct - the immune system part. Since God is one of mercy, there are many exceptions to the sin thing, quite obviously, since we all sin. What's different here is that there are clearly consequences that are MAJOR to this life injunction, and yet there are some that even got jabbed that will be lucky their batch was less toxic, that it was a placebo perhaps, or that the mRNA and delivery vesicle were perhaps degraded. All of these things support my thesis that much of life is random in that capacity, but they do not suggest that God doesn't know better. The only conclusion us humans can come to is that what we think is important, as I've said that many times, is not really aligned with what God does.
As a further thought on this question, somewhat related, think of it: Do you suppose that when you die and are in the timeless state of "being" whatever that means, that when you meet God you would actually say to Him, "That was unfair what just happened to me." Such a consideration is almost laughably funny, which is actually why absurd things (to us) that happen in this life aren't really that big of a deal.
Lets pray for Scott
Forgive me if I misunderstand what you are saying/asking here. I don't think I'd have to meet God to realize "that was unfair to me" is laughable, I can see now and today it's silly to cry out for some kind of cosmic fairness that favors only me. I think our idea of absurd is a human reaction to our inability to categorize or recognize patterns in illogical and improbable things.
In part, but there is a quantum reality of the universe that does deal with randomness.
I've always found Luke 13 interesting, as it relates to this topic:
A tower "randomly" fell on people, and killed them. Others were killed perhaps arbitrarily or through the whims or malice of Pilate. The point is that some people die and there are times when it doesn't fit into some paradigm or good, bad or fair. It just is.
That is a great thing to hear, know, and say. Kudos to both men, doing things the right way.
He made another video where it seems he is getting some unkown treatment. Which will increase the chances of cure to 30%. Conspiracies say it was Trump who guided. Who knows when you are dealing with american endless soap operas.
Why is that Scott something saying people who didn´t take the clot shot are victors? WE ARE ALL LOSERS. Nobody will win stupid man. Another pirate pagan most likely.
My guess is Trump couldn´t accept the fact he was the loser. People who followed his advice lost. If this makes any sense.
Why is that Scott something saying people who didn´t take the clot shot are victors? WE ARE ALL LOSERS. Nobody will win stupid man. Another pirate pagan most likely.
My guess is Trump couldn´t accept the fact he was the loser. People who followed his advice lost. If this makes any sense.