Rural Living, Prepping and Survival

The key in my personal paradigm is being in a heavily wooded unincorporated county with relaxed regulations and an even more relaxed enforcement protocol. Basically the type of area where someone comes to your gate or sends you a letter stating they want to "inspect" your property and you say, "Get a warrant," and they say something like, "Oh nevermind," shake your hand, and leave.

If (((they))) insist then you show them the "fake" front of your property with your livable RV set-up (with self contained on board septic), while avoiding your multiple, spread out, tiny home like structures that are either wholly or partially underground (which necessitates owning a 20K backhoe) and or camouflaged from aerial surveillance.

The true definition of off-grid for me requires no well (rain catchment and at least one year round flowing creek), no septic tank (composting toilets and grey water catchment/filtration), and no public utilities, especially electricity (solar, propane, hydroelectric). In addition there are plenty of very nice areas in America where you can still get 40 to 100 acre parcels of land for less than a thousand dollars an acre. This will not change in our lifetime.
If that video is where I think it was, the counties have zoning laws that put limitations on what can be certified as a residence. Typically a minimum of 600 sq ft, which this house met, but many tiny homes wouldn't. They require a well and septic system. This video mentioned having that requirement. He had previously lived with a composting toilet, which is a viable solution but that location required them to have septic.

Also, their location has an HOA. It's probably a ranch that was broken up into 35 acre plots. The HOA requirements will usually not allow people to live in a long term RV setup. There are some areas full of RV type homes and shacks, and they tend to be quite rough. These HOAs are designed to keep the riff raff out.

Does NC really have land with no zoning requirements like these, or is it a case where they exist, but are not enforced? If this is the case, there's always the risk they could start enforcing them a few years down the road.
 
Does NC really have land with no zoning requirements like these...
No. But there are areas that are large enough to lack enough human resources to do a deep dive on a hundred acres of woods. But this is not something I'd advise doing in NC because it is too densly populated with not enough open wilderness remaining.

.... their location has an HOA.
One of the worst decisions any human wishing to escape The Matrix could ever make. The only part of their set up I was really interested in was the 40K house build which is why I didn't highlight the rest of their set up. A lot of Gen Z'ers are complaining that housing is unaffordable and that they can't find a starter home for less than 300K... Was just trying to dispell that anti-American blackpilled myth.

... the counties have zoning laws that put limitations on what can be certified as a residence...
Unincorporated counties/areas do not have such strict limitations...
The key in my personal paradigm is being in a heavily wooded unincorporated county with relaxed regulations and an even more relaxed enforcement protocol.
There are still vast swaths of land in the US that are considered unincorporated that are void of any local government, much less a staff of enforcement officers.

But besides any of that, personally, I will be living as an outlaw on my own land (even if the land is incorporated). Depending on where I purchase land in the future I will most likely not be asking anyone for permission on how I can use that land. If I get a sense that my land and I aren't going to be bothered much by outside forces then I will be more brazen in my land development approach. I've found that by playing ball with the government you just open up a can of worms and start digging yourself a deeper and deeper hole by revealing your life, plans, and intentions to (((Them))). Best to stealthily strike out in your own direction, develop your plans in secret, live a 99% cash only existence, finance nothing, and get so far out ahead of the government on developing your land that it would take them years, maybe even decades to play catchup. In military terms I believe it's called being "entrenched" and "knowing the lay of the land" where you know your position like the back of your hand and the enemy has no idea where they are at, much less what they are walking into or seeing.

And to be clear, I am not hypothesizing here. I have real world experience in living like this successfully and have known old timers who have been doing things like this for forty plus years in such overregulated states as California. In many ways freedom is a state of mind, sometimes you've gotta' take risks and just say, "F*ck the government, let (((them))) try and stop me," and let the chips fall where they may. No guts, no glory. Is someone really gonna' drive 100 miles from their office with a warrant to enter my property, cut the chain on the gate, search through a 100 acres of woods to find my luxury tree house and underground fort, come back with a crew and bulldozer to tear it all down, arrest me, and seize my land? Maybe, but I doubt it.

Obviously this lifestyle is not for everyone. But I myself am just looking to live a simple, quiet life of hippie style luxury in the woods.
 
Best to stealthily strike out in your own direction, develop your plans in secret, live a 99% cash only existence, finance nothing, and get so far out ahead of the government on developing your land that it would take them years, maybe even decades to play catchup.
Not saying it can't work but posting your master plan to the internet may not be the best course of action...
 
Not saying it can't work but posting your master plan to the internet may not be the best course of action...
This isn't my "master plan," this tale is as old as Ruby Ridge and there are plenty of YouTube videos with millions of views showing more detailed life hacks than this.

Don't let paranoia rule the mind and control the land.
 
As long as you are living in a state that charges annual property tax, you’ll never truly freely be free from a takeover of your land. They will force most people into the 15 min cities not thru force but thru a longeconomic hardship of home/land ownership leaving Blackrock and individual elites to be able to own land/ single family homes and property. Home repair costs, electric bills, farm/lawn equipment pricing will price out most all people eventually from true off grid self sufficient living. I’ve started to really see this occurring in last 5 plus years at an accelerated rate. Even when I bought my home over 20 years ago, they were already making it very difficult for a non-wealthy person to buy land and build on it thru county impact fees ($15k flat fee at the time). Subdivision builders were exempt, only individuals. A guy I know found a loophole by buying a delapidated house on 1 acre of rurual woodland. Lived in a camper for 2 years until he had the house diminished and built a log cabin in its place. Got around the impact fee that way because of the existing property (albeit it was unlivable shack).
 
When you look at history, there was never a time or place where the parasitic class just left you to live alone somewhere without trying to chain you down through dozens of laws and regulations.
Only after war or societal collapse was there a brief period of relative freedom from bureaucracy, but as the dust settled, the cycle began again.
(it's the American story itself)

Sadly, being constantly ruled by some mortal man instead of God is a preferred way of life for all normies, and they are the overwhelming majority everywhere.
If you want to leave the rat race, the time is always now.

In the meantime, you can escape at least mentally by reading, for example, The Stranger in the Woods by Michael Finkel, which I enjoyed thoroughly.
 
A lot of Gen Z'ers are complaining that housing is unaffordable and that they can't find a starter home for less than 300K... Was just trying to dispell that anti-American blackpilled myth.
Most people get their income from a job where they have to be physically present and are therefore not able to live in the middle of nowhere. Any place that has decent job opportunities in the USA and low crime generally has houses at $300,000+ so I don't think the common criticism is unreasonable.
 
Back
Top