You mean end the schism?
Last edited:
Papal conclave
- Thread starter TruckDriver9
- Start date
Cornelius V.E.
Orthodox
He's the protégé of Cardinal Cupich of Chicago and was raised to power thanks to Cupich and apparently heavily supported by Cupich (and Cardinal Maradiaga) in the conclave.
Cupich is unabashedly one of the most aggressively liberal and anti-traditionalist leaders among the Latins. Prevost is also most likely tied to the globalist Western oligarchic "deep state."
I would expect the next 6 months to be relatively calm, with statements/headlines like "Oh wow, the pope said it's good to pray. He's such a holy pope." Then after things settle down, they'll start subtly altering things and inserting things into official teachings. Francis will almost certainly be canonized as a saint, solidifying his teachings for future generations. In addition, the Latins in the USA will receive the most aggressively liberal bishop appointments and the Latins' leadership around the world will only promote aggressive liberals (since the pope appoints all bishops in the world since the Gregorian reforms in the West after the schism of 1054). It's hard to see how the Latins recover from this.
Look up Cardinal Cupich's positions on different issues, and these are most likely going to be the official Roman Catholic "magisterium" within the next 5-10 years. Even more, Prevost is young, and his pontificate could last up to 20 years.
The choice of Leo XIV references back to Leo XIII, who was one of the biggest proponents of "Catholic social justice." So, he's basically declaring himself a Social Justice Warrior as one of his first acts as pope.
Cupich is unabashedly one of the most aggressively liberal and anti-traditionalist leaders among the Latins. Prevost is also most likely tied to the globalist Western oligarchic "deep state."
I would expect the next 6 months to be relatively calm, with statements/headlines like "Oh wow, the pope said it's good to pray. He's such a holy pope." Then after things settle down, they'll start subtly altering things and inserting things into official teachings. Francis will almost certainly be canonized as a saint, solidifying his teachings for future generations. In addition, the Latins in the USA will receive the most aggressively liberal bishop appointments and the Latins' leadership around the world will only promote aggressive liberals (since the pope appoints all bishops in the world since the Gregorian reforms in the West after the schism of 1054). It's hard to see how the Latins recover from this.
Look up Cardinal Cupich's positions on different issues, and these are most likely going to be the official Roman Catholic "magisterium" within the next 5-10 years. Even more, Prevost is young, and his pontificate could last up to 20 years.
The choice of Leo XIV references back to Leo XIII, who was one of the biggest proponents of "Catholic social justice." So, he's basically declaring himself a Social Justice Warrior as one of his first acts as pope.
Cornelius V.E.
Orthodox
One of the next stages in the Latins' "development of doctrine", I believe, is this (and it was already starting to happen under Francis, especially in Latin America):
In the name of the new ecumenism (which since Vatican II all popes have promoted but it was condemned as apostasy before Vatican II), bishops around the world will start "concelebrating" liturgies with protestant (especially Anglican) clergy, which will including female Anglican priests and female Anglican bishops.
This will become a mainstream practice.... until eventually it doesn't make sense that you can concelebrate with a woman priest in another sect but you can't have women priests in your own sect. Voila, women can be ordained.
In the name of the new ecumenism (which since Vatican II all popes have promoted but it was condemned as apostasy before Vatican II), bishops around the world will start "concelebrating" liturgies with protestant (especially Anglican) clergy, which will including female Anglican priests and female Anglican bishops.
This will become a mainstream practice.... until eventually it doesn't make sense that you can concelebrate with a woman priest in another sect but you can't have women priests in your own sect. Voila, women can be ordained.
Shaquilleoatmeal
Protestant
Where this new pope is headed if he doesn’t repent.
Last edited:
Basically, the guy will be leftwing on all issues except two: Abortion and gay marriage.
Abortion will always remain a hard sin, and gay marriage isn't equal with straight marriage (i.e. there is no such thing as gay marriage).
In spite of that, Cupich was in favor of giving Catholics in gay marriages communion (!), and compared victims of gun violence the same as aborted fetuses (until we ban the gunz then it's as bad as allowing abortions!!!1).
Just for comparison, my Bishop once told me if I married someone outside of the Church, say, for example, to give a woman US citizenship, that I would be excommunicated until I got married in the Church. Getting married outside of the Church is still an excommunicable offense within traditional Christianity, yet Cupich will dissolve this barrier as well.
Cupich on women deacons:
Cardinal Cupich on the synod, women deacons, giving bishops job reviews and why ‘LGBTQ’ was left out of the final doc
Exclusive interview: Cardinal Cupich on the end of the first session of the Synod on Synodality.
www.americamagazine.org
He wants to give women more "leadership" within the Catholic Church.
Make no mistake if this happens then it's just a matter of time before the entire Church is brought down. The Catholic Church has survived dozens of heresies (itself being founded on a heresy) but giving women leadership will completely accelerate the abandonment of dogma in favor of feelings, just like the Anglican Church.
Once women are in it won't be long before gay marriage is totally accepted.
I'm not sure there's anything Catholics can do at this point other than find a new Church, if this ultra liberal Pope was chosen in just 1 day then even if we were to lose this Pope to cancer, a new replacement would be very quick and just as liberal. It seems the entire church is corrupt at the top, which will rot the body out to the bottom.
Fun fact: I've met Blaise. I wish it were Pascal, but nothing stood out. Just seemed like a bureaucrat to me, whatever that means, but it's not like most RCs know what's going on. The only ones with a clue are already fairly anti-catholic in that they don't really know what to do with the fact that their church has been obviously on the decline now for hundreds of years, and certainly a progressive mess in the west for several decades (post Vatican II). Those same RCs hate Cupich and yes, it's hard to reconcile all of this when you give such a headline and priority to single people (such as the Pope) - but it's easier to look the other way when it's some random bishop, as historically it hasn't been uncommon for any rogue bishop to be dealt with. Dolan probably would have been better but I think he's actually more conservative. I suspect this might be a "catch them on their heels" plan for a decade or so, just like you are pointing out, Cornelius.
I'm not sure, but I think you have to believe that until proven otherwise. What's good about him being in the same vein of subverting most with social justice? More people will come to Orthodoxy.
Shaquilleoatmeal
Protestant