Nick Fuentes Thread

What mistake?
Fuentes is obviously cooperating with the feds at a minimum...but it doesn't take a very high IQ to figure that one out.
Yes, Fuentes' message is exactly what the "Feds" want. Call out Jewish supremacism, question the voting process and legitimacy of the govt., call out the evil of Israel, call out the issues with immigration and anti-White policies, and organize to push back and change it all. I am sure this is the exact message the Federal govt. wants the people to here.

I don't trust or like Nick very much, but to think the Federal govt. wants to push the message Nick pushes is pretty crazy.
 
I wonder if Joseph McCarthy was a Fed since to my knowledge he didn't name the Jew, only the identifying it as the "Red Menance". 🤔

Some say Hitler was a plant.

It's a Hell of thing fighting an enemy that thrives on Subterfuge or Subversion to destroy it's enemies. The unknown leads folks to all kinds of confusion and distrust of our fellow man. Looking for sincerity can be a challenge.

I guess that quote of Christ saying many will come in my name comes to the forefront.
 
I don't trust or like Nick very much,
That makes more than a few of us on here now...
but to think the Federal govt. wants to push the message Nick pushes is pretty crazy.
Where in my response did I say that they want that message being pushed? He didn't go to jail as @eradicator pointed out, but for sure they did talk to him. "Hey buddy, if you wanna stay out of the slammer, all you gotta do..."

Think about it some more, if you haven't heard this before anywhere else you can use it for original content on your podcast ;)
 
Yes, Fuentes' message is exactly what the "Feds" want. Call out Jewish supremacism, question the voting process and legitimacy of the govt., call out the evil of Israel, call out the issues with immigration and anti-White policies, and organize to push back and change it all. I am sure this is the exact message the Federal govt. wants the people to here.

I don't trust or like Nick very much, but to think the Federal govt. wants to push the message Nick pushes is pretty crazy.
This is true.

On the other hand, he and his supporters are very cantankerous, and tend to get into petty spats with other people on their own side for little reason.

That doesn't change that the January 6 situation makes no sense, especially as his some of his own supporters ended up in jail.

I can't think of any other reason he could have avoided jail than making a deal.

He was exactly the person they wanted to make an example of, so why didn't they?

It doesn't really make sense.
 
This is true.

On the other hand, he and his supporters are very cantankerous, and tend to get into petty spats with other people on their own side for little reason.

That doesn't change that the January 6 situation makes no sense, especially as his some of his own supporters ended up in jail.

I can't think of any other reason he could have avoided jail than making a deal.

He was exactly the person they wanted to make an example of, so why didn't they?

It doesn't really make sense.
Yes, without a doubt that lingers in my mind. I totally thought he was likely some Fed asset as well. But after he refused to support Trump, called out the entire democratic process as fake, which is the exact opposite of what our federal govt. has done, and he has gone on to red pill hundreds of thousands of young men, it is hard to believe he is a Fed asset.

Maybe he was at one time, and has broken away. Maybe he is, but is allowed to talk about these things, because they think he is a last resort gatekeeper, but that is hard to believe they would push these talking points.

I don't know what he exactly is, but a billionaire who wants to flood the country with millions of Indians, so he can save labor costs, and most his business comes from the FEDS, calling someone else a "Fed" tells you exactly what the "Fed" labeled pressed by Trump's Con. Inc. really is about.
 
Yes, without a doubt that lingers in my mind. I totally thought he was likely some Fed asset as well. But after he refused to support Trump, called out the entire democratic process as fake, which is the exact opposite of what our federal govt. has done, and he has gone on to red pill hundreds of thousands of young men, it is hard to believe he is a Fed asset.

Maybe he was at one time, and has broken away. Maybe he is, but is allowed to talk about these things, because they think he is a last resort gatekeeper, but that is hard to believe they would push these talking points.

I don't know what he exactly is, but a billionaire who wants to flood the country with millions of Indians, so he can save labor costs, and most his business comes from the FEDS, calling someone else a "Fed" tells you exactly what the "Fed" labeled pressed by Trump's Con. Inc. really is about.
Maybe he's a 4chan asset?

He has a secret squad of Pepe's waging war against the Feds that try to arrest him.

jmxn5qd7rjb81-censored.png
 
Yes, without a doubt that lingers in my mind. I totally thought he was likely some Fed asset as well. But after he refused to support Trump, called out the entire democratic process as fake, which is the exact opposite of what our federal govt. has done, and he has gone on to red pill hundreds of thousands of young men, it is hard to believe he is a Fed asset.

Maybe he was at one time, and has broken away. Maybe he is, but is allowed to talk about these things, because they think he is a last resort gatekeeper, but that is hard to believe they would push these talking points.

I don't know what he exactly is, but a billionaire who wants to flood the country with millions of Indians, so he can save labor costs, and most his business comes from the FEDS, calling someone else a "Fed" tells you exactly what the "Fed" labeled pressed by Trump's Con. Inc. really is about.

To echo yourself and others, yeah I find it extremely unlikely he's a Fed. This particular show where he addressed the Jan 6 allegations truly settled it for me, in particular the testimony under oath that Feds have never spoke to him and him being treated completely unlike known informants.

But even before that show it made no sense when he's one of the few calling out Jewish control over American politics, who could possibly be gaining from this when we already know the US intelligence apparatus is completely infiltrated and the last thing they'd want is someone calling out the corruption.
 
But even before that show it made no sense when he's one of the few calling out Jewish control over American politics, who could possibly be gaining from this when we already know the US intelligence apparatus is completely infiltrated and the last thing they'd want is someone calling out the corruption.
It wouldn't be the first time the CIA has infiltrated a white supremacist movement. Or even the second.


Conversely, well Hitler was arrested, and we all know how well that worked out. Maybe they were scared?



Afterall, none of the January 6th protesters they arrested had large media followings, at least on the scale Nick does.

I don't know any of their political views other than "right wing MAGA".

Maybe they were afraid the moderates on the right would see a National Socialist being persecuted alongside them and think maybe National Socialists aren't the bad guys after all.

It happened anyway though thanks to Andrew Torba building Gab to give us Free Speech, and Elon building X so we could get banned for speaking it.
 
Live now.

Definitely a contentious interview. Looks like Fuentes knew that in advance.


You gotta love the intro, where he says "a preposterous amount of time has been spent talking to him, a-tulll"

I laughed as I'm of course aware Piers, you're about to interview him for a long time here, :poop: head

then he cuts to this phaggy black youtuber, who isn't stupid, he's just a pussy
 
Fuentes at the start, listening to Piers and knowing what he's up to

Mcdonalds Grimace GIF
 
I'm still not a Nick Fuentes fans for a lot of reasons, not the least of which is that I still think he's a fed....but this was plum hilarious.

Do you know what "per capital and proportionality" is Piers?


Piers at least had him on. Which is a big deal for Piers.... And I'm sure the AIPAC group will go after him for platforming Fuentes.
 
I'm still not a Nick Fuentes fans for a lot of reasons, not the least of which is that I still think he's a fed....but this was plum hilarious.

Do you know what "per capital and proportionality" is Piers?


Piers at least had him on. Which is a big deal for Piers.... And I'm sure the AIPAC group will go after him for platforming Fuentes.
What are your opinions on piers morgan virgin shaming him? We all know Fuentes could get laid if he wants, so doesn’t that make Piers Morgan look pathetic?
 

What are your opinions on piers morgan virgin shaming him? We all know Fuentes could get laid if he wants, so doesn’t that make Piers Morgan look pathetic?
What did you think of it?

Clearly not effective at all. Piers doesn't get it at all.

He thinks calling him an incel virgin is going to land points but I think the defense of ignoring it and moving past it was correct.

On Piers:


On Nick: I'm more interested in Nick's defense of his Jan 6 behavior. By promoting the storming of the capital he effectively circumvented any chance Trump had to really bring up the correct electoral college remedy and this got Q trolled. That's why I'm of the opinion that he's a fed (all be it that there's a possibly not knowingly)
 
What did you think of it?

Clearly not effective at all. Piers doesn't get it at all.

He thinks calling him an incel virgin is going to land points but I think the defense of ignoring it and moving past it was correct.

On Piers:


On Nick: I'm more interested in Nick's defense of his Jan 6 behavior. By promoting the storming of the capital he effectively circumvented any chance Trump had to really bring up the correct electoral college remedy and this got Q trolled. That's why I'm of the opinion that he's a fed (all be it that there's a possibly not knowingly)

Where did he promote the Jan 6 storming? I just googled it and found nothing.
 
Back
Top