Nick Fuentes Thread

[Sandalwood Peak]

Maybe Jews are okay with the antisemitism leaving containment? Thinking 3 steps ahead?

White people haven't really proven to be an immediate threat. Blacks terrorize whites, and there isn't any retribution. Likewise, if all whites think the Jews are bad, will there be retribution or just moaning and groaning?

 

[NSOE]

He just shows that the bellwether is changing for speech and that not everything is totally controlled at this point. In fact, as many have stated, there is simply too much on yt and X to even bother with censoring at this point.

Agree with all of that.

Getting away with Jan 6 involvement is puzzling, this is my first time hearing about it, but a lot of technicalities go into building a case; still no charges at all makes you wonder. You must have your guard up if you associate with him, is he an informant as magoo implies, like in communist Poland or the Stasi moles in East Germany. Lech Walesa was an asset of the government, first recruited by the military intelligence, people in the Solidarity movement knew something back in the 70s.

The internet is a good thing after all. Long ago, curious people knew about Vince Foster, the suicided Clinton associate, now news reach all, and a lot faster, if only by accident though the algos do their jobs.

 

[Blade Runner]

Maybe Jews are okay with the antisemitism leaving containment? Thinking 3 steps ahead?

If you follow Dixon like I've recommended, you'll see that the powers that be are moving on from Israel and I think that's an explanation of why they don't care as much about the diaspora. The Js will still have a world role but their center or base in the ME as the religious reason for the HQ for bankers/wars is over. Watch, as Gaza is already talked about as being "in peace" and the GCC is also sending its own security forces there. Trump said the other day that other countries were volunteering to do it, alone even. This is a huge turn, and if you are paying attention, it's far too quick which suggests that it's managed by the bigger players. Bibi will be gone and you'll see "peace" in Gaza and with the Palestinian stuff. Normies won't see it, they'll think like Trump or someone else was some grand peace player or adviser. It's all money and what the big boys really want. Israel is old news at this point, for the most part.

 

[Sandalwood Peak]

 

[FrostBITE]

 

[Iakobos]

It does feel over for Israel unless they execute the mother of all false flags before too long (God forbid). The fact that it hasn't happened yet is surprising honestly.

 

[Thomas More]

Edit: in X this tweet is by Fuentes, but here it appears to be Tate alone. Here is how it looks in X

 

[It_Is_My_Time]

Edit: in X this tweet is by Fuentes, but here it appears to be Tate alone. Here is how it looks in X

View attachment 25310

I don't get it, Nick's and Andrew's point is to see your wife as your wife and not as your best friend and complete equal, so she ends up running the show and runs the family off the cliff, as modern women tend to do.

 

[It_Is_My_Time]

It does, no one is the USA cares about these two countries anymore. The popularity of Israel has fallen off a cliff and become poisonous for politicians. Ukraine talk is mostly avoided. Yes, we are still bankrupting our countries supporting them, but this can't be kept up much longer. Resources are dwindling, people are openly hating on Israel at every turn, and no one cares about Ukraine except some extreme weirdo leftist who instantly go quiet when you ask why they support forever war but don't sign up to fight themselves.

Without some major changes, in 5 years Ukraine and Israel will be extremely weak. And by major changes, I mean a complete shift in DC policies, and I don't see that happening.

Nick is wrong here, but Nick isn't the brightest. In fact, this seems more like him poisoning the well of Israel opposition on purpose to say "okay, Israel sucks, but we are stuck with them and stop talking about it, they are just going to win anyway".

 

[Thomas More]

I don't get it, Nick's and Andrew's point is to see your wife as your wife and not as your best friend and complete equal, so she ends up running the show and runs the family off the cliff, as modern women tend to do.

The thing is, they are describing this way of dealing with a wife as gay, but a wife is a woman, and gay would mean sex with a man. They are crazy and mixed up to say this.

 

[It_Is_My_Time]

The thing is, they are describing this way of dealing with a wife as gay, but a wife is a woman, and gay would mean sex with a man. They are crazy and mixed up to say this.

Yea, the slang term "gay" is an incorrect term to use, whereas it should more be used as "simp".

I did once hear Nick say he thought men hooking up with random women as being "gay". And after he explained it, it made sense. These men see sex as the highest ideal of life and spend all their time and resources on getting laid, like a gay man would do, rather than seeing women as wives, their partners who help raise their children, and sex as just another by-product of it all. Becoming sex craven/lust is much like being "gay", though extending that mindset and belief on to men who are married seems like a stretch. I agree with you.

 

[Thomas More]

Yea, the slang term "gay" is an incorrect term to use, whereas it should more be used as "simp".

I did once hear Nick say he thought men hooking up with random women as being "gay". And after he explained it, it made sense. These men see sex as the highest ideal of life and spend all their time and resources on getting laid, like a gay man would do, rather than seeing women as wives, their partners who help raise their children, and sex as just another by-product of it all. Becoming sex craven/lust is much like being "gay", though extending that mindset and belief on to men who are married seems like a stretch. I agree with you.

I guess I have heard of this idea of making up a new definition for that word, but I think it just causes confusion. Having male-male sex is gay. Two men thinking they are romantically in love is gay. A man being promiscuous with women is not gay, even if gay men are promiscuous with men. Likewise, having trouble maintaining the lead in a relationship with your wife is not like being gay.

Gay is a different category from simping or screwing around.

 

[Blade Runner]

though extending that mindset and belief on to men who are married seems like a stretch. I agree with you.

They just think that not having order and a man being the man in the relationship (not some friend of a woman like a fag hag is) is less than manly. And it is, since it's like being neutered. There's a reason we joke that a man that has to ask his wife for this or to do that should "get his ball sack back from her purse."

Gay is a different category from simping or screwing around.

You're being too literal. It's just an aspect of the gheys, and a pejorative, not a catch-all or perfect analogy.

 

[Get2choppaaa]

They just think that not having order and a man being the man in the relationship (not some friend of a woman like a fag hag is) is less than manly. And it is, since it's like being neutered. There's a reason we joke that a man that has to ask his wife for this or to do that should "get his ball sack back from her purse."

You're being too literal. It's just an aspect of the gheys, and a pejorative, not a catch-all or perfect analogy.

Yeah except listening to an unmarried borderline closet gay at best and a muzzie fame whore cam girl con artist about marriage advice is like getting advice from a dude who goes into bankruptcy every 7 years but has the master plan for how you should run your finances.

No man whose going to be bullied by his wife is going to listen to these two faggots and then men who do need this advice aren't going to be amenable to these messengers.

Fuentes is still young so maybe he will grow out of the faggotry behavior and effeminate insecure projection.

Tate just needs to go ahead and be erased from the history books of relevant people. Again, a man who made money off of women conning men into giving up their possessions for Internet cam companionship. These are loathsome douche bags. I don't care if Romania throws both of the brothers into jail.

I'm pretty sure Jordan Peterson has some relationship advice we should be listening too while we are all at it.

 

[It_Is_My_Time]

Yeah except listening to an unmarried borderline closet gay at best and a muzzie fame whore cam girl con artist about marriage advice is like getting advice from a dude who goes into bankruptcy every 7 years but has the master plan for how you should run your finances.

No man whose going to be bullied by his wife is going to listen to these two faggots and then men who do need this advice aren't going to be amenable to these messengers.

Fuentes is still young so maybe he will grow out of the faggotry behavior and effeminate insecure projection.

Tate just needs to go ahead and be erased from the history books of relevant people. Again, a man who made money off of women conning men into giving up their possessions for Internet cam companionship. I don't care if Romania throws both of the brothers into jail.

Young men have little to no guidance in the west. These two have helped millions of young men get out of the blue-pill box and to start to think differently.

It isn't that they are experts, it is there either are no experts or the experts on this subject have no reach or relevancy in today's world. So, the young men find the best advice they can, and it ends up being these two. Outside of them, the advice just doesn't 'work in today's world where women are a complete disaster.

 

[Blade Runner]

No man whose going to be bullied by his wife is going to listen to these two faggots and then men who do need this advice aren't going to be amenable to these messengers.

It's too late, I agree, for those types, but they are likely already married. Where they help is that they show that the ROI isn't worth it. One of the things that many modern and married men miss is that men don't care that you "need them" to hope your ponzi and status quo as a married man with kids. The ROI isn't there. Notice also that this will decrease the fertility rate but the reality is that society failed men and women not being formed properly is the reason actually why the rate is down, and will continue that way.

I'm pretty sure Jordan Peterson has some relationship advice we should be listening too while we are all at it.

Boomer extraordinaire that can't even corral his own daughter from being part of the problem. Great.

Outside of them, the advice just doesn't 'work in today's world where women are a complete disaster.

The structure is against men entirely, and the government has had an interest to make it that way = make consensus and status quo important, and thus stop any challengers to the state (feminized society). Where the governments end up paying the price is that they lose all the builders and economic activity, which is almost entirely men. There's a reason why people have written books on productivity declining and fake jobs increasing over the years. It's largely government replacing men, printing, and faking it. The game can of course last longer than expected because the inertia from the greatest economy, which still has some tech and some global slave labor, is huge.