LGBT Agenda


Faggots can’t commit “hate crimes” against trannies.
 

Faggots can’t commit “hate crimes” against trannies.
The proper response if they’re gonna hit you with a hate crime:

1749730332202.png
 
I just found out that Jeff younger, lost the battle to save his son James from being chemically castrated by his mother.



This was a long ongoing battle that I originally found out about on the old forms. The crazy mother took her son from Texas to California to have him chemically castrated. The only good news is that the clinic where she had the procedure done is now being closed finally.. I saw the Twitter post just now. Don’t stick your dick in crazy.
 
I just found out that Jeff younger, lost the battle to save his son James from being chemically castrated by his mother.



This was a long ongoing battle that I originally found out about on the old forms. The crazy mother took her son from Texas to California to have him chemically castrated. The only good news is that the clinic where she had the procedure done is now being closed finally.. I saw the Twitter post just now. Don’t stick your dick in crazy.

The worst part is that she isn’t even biologically related to either boys. They were conceived via IVF with Jeff Younger’s sperm and donor eggs. Another reason IVF is an abomination. Can you imagine, as a woman, discovering your egg donation contributed to this? It’s nuts this woman is even allowed to do this, much less to a child that’s not biologically hers. I wonder if she would have done this if he was her natural child….
 

The Supreme Court gathered again this year to decide what rights parents are allowed to have in the future and determined, by split decision, that our kids don’t necessarily have to listen if faggots want to teach them about anal or tranny stuff.
 
By SCOTUS standards 6-3 is a respectable majority. 5-4 is split. 6-3 shows we were "safe enough" from becoming totally pozzed. It is ridiculous that it's not 9-0, I agree with you in spirit.
I’m speaking tongue in cheek for sardonic effect, not technically. The fact that this is an issue being decided by a court, let alone the highest court in the land, is Willy Wonka world. The fact that any person, let alone three “justices” on that court, who would vote in that manner is surreal.

Imagine being alive in 1800 and reading the news from 2025. One moment you think the courts exist to determine property disputes or resolve squabbles over contracts. But no, a window into the future shows you that people are getting all excited because six of nine justices on the Supreme Court decided that a faggot curriculum in grammar school was only optional, but the other three wanted to force children to learn about anal and something called “transitioning.”

And then you learn that the court also ruled that it was ok to make a law that required age verification for pornography, something which they kept referring to as “free speech,” so that only adults would be able to masturbate to brutal orgies. And the same justices also voted against that one, because they thought children should be able to do that too.

The legal system in the United States of America in 2025 is a parody of a dysfunctional dystopia, something people 200 years ago wouldn’t even be able to imagine. It should be mocked, as should anyone who takes it seriously.
 
Back
Top