Latest UK Lunacy

Apparently 10 people were stabbed in Huntingdon and it's being considered an act of terrorism.



Edit: so many Britons are gonna get arrested for hate speech online. The government won't have time to prosecute the perpetrators.

Also, this indiscriminate stabbing reminds me of somethings Ivan the Terrible would have done. Yet it has now become a yearly occurrence throughout western Europe.
 
Droughtmeat said:
Apparently 10 people were stabbed in Huntingdon and it's being considered an act of terrorism.



Edit: so many Britons are gonna get arrested for hate speech online. The government won't have time to prosecute the perpetrators.

Also, this indiscriminate stabbing reminds me of somethings Ivan the Terrible would have done. Yet it has now become a yearly occurrence throughout western Europe.
Click to expand...

"About to explode"

We've been hearing this for a while now.
 
This is supposedly news. What a joke, they take in millions of people and then it's a headline that one of them verbally expresses gratitude. Shouldn't that just be normal and not worthy of a headline article?

"Refugee thanks UK for giving family sanctuary"

www.bbc.com

Entrepreneurial refugee says 'thank you UK' for giving family sanctuary

Since settling in North Yorkshire, Nahid Hamidi has set up a pop-up restaurant and helps other refugees.
www.bbc.com www.bbc.com
 
It has come to my understanding that when the left punishes England in the name of guilt over Colonialism, God allows this not without reason.

As I have mentioned before, Tewodros II Emperor of Ethiopia asked England for aid in the Abyssinian Expedition against Muslims.

However, I did not mention that this was because he had attempted to outlaw slavery, and rebels weakened the country leading to it's neighbours, every single one of which has been Muslim since the 11th century invading.

He was ignored for 2 years while the Diplomat paraded through Muslim countries, entreating enemies of the Church.

He took the Diplomat prisoner and started to go mad. England launched the Abyssinian Expedition to rescue the Diplomat.

He was driven to suicide in the end, killing himself with the very pistol Queen Victoria had gifted him, and Queen Victoria repented over his death, raising his son as her own.

Us ending Slavery is not recognised by the left not because they are evil, but because we abandoned one who attempted to do the same. The Abyssinian Expedition was 1868, 35 years after Britain outlawed slavery.

Satan accuses us of Colonialism, to hide that we are guilty of failing it.

Tewodros II did not necessarily want aid for free, but the English did not listen to a single word he said.

So too does God not hear a single word when we beg for salvation from the Muslim invaders sacking and raping England today..

Merely a decade later, despite Queen Victoria attempting repentance, in 1877 when the Russo-Turkish war occurred, and Russia nearly retook Constantinople, France and England intervened out of fear that upsetting the balance of power in the Continent would lead to Russia invading them.

Betraying God out of fear of men.

In WW2, when those countries should have been punished by the Soviet Union, Germany instead spent all it's efforts fighting Bolshevism, devoting 80% of it's efforts to fighting Russia, while being attacked by the very nations responsible.

God allows evil to occur as a trial sometimes yes. But he also allows it to occur as a punishment for sin.

The sins of the father are not the sins of the son.

Yet, defending their sins will not achieve anything.

I am half-Eritrean, so I can say I genuinely forgive England, and those ancestors of us that made these failures.

Yet, if we do not recognise these truths, I fear our ancestors might not forgive themselves.
 
Giordano Bruno said:
The sins of the father are not the sins of the son.
Click to expand...
This is true, a son cannot repent of, or seek forgiveness for something his father (or anyone else) did, it wouldn't make sense. It's also true the descendants can feel the consequences of the sins of their ancestor- from the book of Exodus:

And the LORD passed by before him, and proclaimed, The LORD, The LORD God, merciful and gracious, longsuffering, and abundant in goodness and truth, Keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and that will by no means clear the guilty; visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, and upon the children's children, unto the third and to the fourth generation.
 
NSOE said:
This is true, a son cannot repent of, or seek forgiveness for something his father (or anyone else) did, it wouldn't make sense. It's also true the descendants can feel the consequences of the sins of their ancestor- from the book of Exodus:
Click to expand...
When I say "do not recognise these truths", I refer to the fact that not only are these things not taught, not known, most people don't even care.

If these sins are not recognised or corrected, but instead repeated, we will certainly become guilty.

While Britain did not participate in the sacking of Constantinople, France, the HRE and Venice did.

Now Western Europe is being sacked instead.
 
So, I remembered that old story of Jews convincing Oliver Cromwell to let them back in the country by telling him the English were a lost tribe of Israel.

They were definitely lying at the time, but I think God used them to deliver a truth, perhaps to punish them for it.

I found evidence suggesting the tribe of Ephraim settled in England and the tribe of Manasseh settled in America.

Both are known as tribes of warriors and brother tribes, with Manasseh being the eldest.

Britain in Prophecy.

The author, Brian Williams, told this story:

The southern tribes of Judah and Benjamin were allowed to return to the Promised Land from their captivity in Babylon. The 10 northern tribes—“Israel”—failed to make it home from Assyria and were dispersed among the nations. But prophecy demands that, in the end, they will be part of the Kingdom, so LostTribesthey must still exist. In this connection, Ephraim and Manasseh made their way to England and America, where they have been a blessing. (The general notion has appealed to some pretty famous people, including Christian Science founder Mary Baker Eddy, New Zealand Prime Minister William Massey, and Yale professor C. A. L. Totten.) As for Williams’s rationale, here are some items of his so-called “proof”:
1. Geography: Isaiah 31:8 and 14 speak of nations to the north and west, and verse 15 calls for glorification of “the name of the Lord God of Israel in the isles of the sea” (KJV).2 Unfortunately, the ESV and other modern translations render the “isles” of Isaiah 31:15 as “coastlands,” which could fit all sorts of non-British locales, including Finland and France.
2. Chronology: Taking his cue from Revelation 12:6-14, where prophecy links a count of three and a half to 1,260 days (meaning “years”), and then drawing on Leviticus 26:24 to set Israel’s penalty at a factor of seven (or double the three and a half), Williams gets a span of 2520 years. Counting from the beginning of the Assyrian captivity in 721 BC, he says that God’s judgment on Israel expired in AD 1800, at the time of the rise of the British Empire.
3. Genealogy: Working from Genesis 48, he says that Jacob’s blessing the younger Ephraim before his elder brother Manasseh means that Americans are from the latter tribe. The order of blessing made Manasseh the 13th child, and 13 figures prominently into American history, with its 13 colonies. Furthermore, verse 19 says that Manasseh shall become “a people” (America), while Ephraim shall become “a multitude of nations” (the British Commonwealth).
4. Etymology & Symbology: The name for the English county of East Anglia came from the Hebrew word, eglah, “meaning heifer or ox, which was the tribal symbol of Ephraim.” And then there’s the American seal, with its eagle, heavenly bodies, shield, arrows, and olive branch—all symbols connected with ancient Israel. (I’m surprised he didn’t link up with the first battle of the Civil War, Manasseh, especially since the other name for that conflict is Bull Run, which can be tied to the bullocks sacrificed in Israelite worship.)
Click to expand...

The website I found it on calls this eisegesis, asking "Why don’t native Englishmen seem Semitic?”

Amusingly enough, I know the answer. Modern Talmudic Jews are the descendants of Esau, who interbred with Canaanites and Hittites.

1000018634.jpg

So England Is Populated by the Lost Tribe of Ephraim?

One afternoon in a Chicago used bookstore, I ran across a booklet with the intriguing title, Britain in Prophecy.1 I’d heard about something called “British Israelism” and of some connections with Herbert W. Armstrong’s Worldwide
biblemesh.com biblemesh.com



The British are the descendants of the Tribe of Ephraim.

God gifted the tribe as warriors and valiant fighters (1 Chronicles 12:30)

Manasseh were also described as such. I Chronicles 5:18-22. "valiant men, men able to bear shield and sword, to shoot with the bow, and skillful in war" (verse 18). Their leaders were "mighty men of valor, famous men" (verse 24).

What the Bible says about Manasseh's Warrior Culture

Before the children of Israel entered the Land of Promise, the folk of Gad, Reuben, and half the tribe of Manasseh appealed to Moses to let them settle …
www.bibletools.org
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top