Latest UK Lunacy

Starmer is growing on me. I like this no-nonsense approach. The plebs wave the flags, a week later he rolls out the dog collar program for them. You got to respect it. No apologies, no shame. Unironically, white people are getting their balls back. Unfortunately, it's the white treacherous homos. Let's hope it rubs off.

I guess they’re doing this to curry favor with Pakis?


 
Last edited by a moderator:
I always find it interesting examining BBC articles, they say a lot about the state of Britain. In this one, the BBC report how a member of the (traitarous) Tory shadow cabinet criticised the lack of integration within a suburb of Birmingham and then they proceed to publish fake outrage from every possible angle (including from a Tory mayor and the local Archbishop of the Church of England) without ever actually telling their readers what the demographics of the suburb look like.


Shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick says he does not regret remarks he made in March about the Handsworth area of Birmingham, in which he called it "one of the worst-integrated places" he had ever been to.

In a recording reportedly made during a dinner and published by the Guardian, Jenrick said he had not seen "another white face" in the hour-and-a-half he spent in Handsworth filming a video about litter.

Jenrick said on Tuesday he had no regrets about the language he used and would not "shy away" from issues of integration.

I've been to Birmingham a few times but had never heard of Handsworth before. I checked out the demographics and they are horrendous. Whites are at less than 10% and probably a significant portion of those are not natives. Total dispossession.

1759872192424.png
Cue the fake outrage and denial to stop people talking about the problem:

The Labour West Midlands mayor Richard Parker said he believed Jenrick's comments were racist - something Jenrick strongly rejected - while Labour Party chair Anna Turley said they reduced people "to the colour of their skin". Parker said he was "appalled" and "disgusted" by Jenrick's comments made in the recording.

His comments were echoed by Turley, who said in his remarks, Jenrick "reduces people to the colour of their skin and judges his own level of comfort by whether there are other white faces around".

But public figures from within the region have disputed Jenrick's comments, with former Conversative mayor of the West Midlands Andy Street telling BBC Newsnight Jenrick was "wrong". Street, who described Handsworth as "a very integrated place" also rejected Jenrick's recorded comment that Handsworth was "the closest I've come to a slum in this country".

In a letter to Jenrick, the Bishop of Birmingham, Dr Michael Volland said the comments had the potential to "stir up division" and "feed into a harmful narrative that provides fuel for a fire of toxic nationalism".

Handsworth's Independent MP Ayoub Khan said Jenrick's remarks were "not only wildly false but also incredibly irresponsible".

Rani Rawji, who works for a business improvement district in the area, said it had Christians, Muslims, Sikhs and Hindus working, living and shopping happily together. She said: "Everybody's happy. We don't seem to have an issue."

To be fair they did provide publish one comment from a local which supported with Jenrick, from a local Pakistani Muslim of all people. I had a good laugh when I read it.

However, Mariaj Khan agreed with the description of the area as a slum and said he was not offended by the MP's comments because he felt they were true.

Mr Khan said he only saw Asian and black people, adding: "I never saw a white face around here."

He said that there were white people in the area but they tended not to be British.

And lastly the other part I noted is that despite the fact that Jenrick didn't roll over and apologies for his comments, he actually said something in the original recording which is really very weak:

It's not about the colour of your skin, or your faith, of course it isn't. But I want people to be living alongside each other, not parallel lives.

So in other words, having your people racially replaced, and by people of other religions at that, is not a problem in and of itself. The usual secular liberal idea that we can unite around something which isn't our tribe or religion. The problem is not the colonisation, it could actually work out well, we just need to tweak some policies so that its managed better!

We're not even at the beginning of a solution until the Overton window moves to the point that politicians are talking about remigration of citizens.
 
Last edited:
I like how you think the non-whites were the ones who came up with this dogshit idea. Got some bad news for you.
Who said anything about non-whites coming up with the idea? I’d presume the idea came from a bunch of faggots and women within the Anglican “church,” under doctrines inspired by the usual suspects. Regardless, the text posted above states that they are “focusing on partnering with marginalised communities—such as Punjabi, black and brown diaspora, neurodivergent, and LGBTQIA+ groups.” So uh . . . Who is “reclaiming” territory and cultural heritage and on behalf of whom?
 
I’d presume the idea came from a bunch of faggots and women within the Anglican “church,” under doctrines inspired by the usual suspects.

I've said it before, but, unfortunately, the Orthodox church is the only large Christian church that seems normal on an institutional level. Everyone else is either gay, anti-christian or even satanic to a certain extent as an institution. It's pathetic at this point.
 
Back
Top