Yes, no question, he knows that he has a role to play, for which is has been handsomely rewarded. Like Jared Taylor, he married into the tribe, got promoted and built generational wealth.
Jordan Peterson Thread
- Thread starter JCSteel
- Start date
-
- Tags
- public figures zionist
Yes, no question, he knows that he has a role to play, for which is has been handsomely rewarded. Like Jared Taylor, he married into the tribe, got promoted and built generational wealth.
Seems appropriate to post this here.
Summary from https://gist.ly/youtube-summarizer
## The Journey of Conservative Advocacy: Lessons from Charlie Kirk’s Rise
In the ever-evolving landscape of American culture and politics, few stories are as compelling as that of Charlie Kirk, the founder and leader of Turning Point USA. His journey from a high school student concerned about cookie prices to the architect of the largest conservative youth organization in the world offers a unique lens through which to examine the challenges, transformations, and opportunities facing young people—especially young men—in the West today.
This article explores the roots of Kirk’s political awakening, the cultural and educational forces that shaped his worldview, the rise of campus activism, and the deeper spiritual and philosophical questions that underpin the current culture wars. Along the way, it draws out lessons for anyone seeking meaning, purpose, and a productive path forward in a time of profound societal upheaval.
---
## Early Influences: From Cookie Advocacy to Political Awakening
### The Humble Beginnings
Charlie Kirk’s political journey began in an unexpected place: a high school campaign against “cookie inflation.” At 16 or 17, he and his peers noticed that the price of homemade cookies at their school had nearly tripled in a year. In response, they formed “Students Against Cookie Inflation,” a tongue-in-cheek but earnest effort to address what felt like a pressing issue at the time.
Looking back, Kirk admits with a laugh that perhaps he should have been advocating for healthier food options, like reducing the price of hamburgers or steaks. Yet, this seemingly trivial campaign was the spark that ignited his passion for advocacy and organizing.
### The Obama Era and a Spirit of Dissent
Kirk’s formative years coincided with the meteoric rise of Barack Obama, a political phenomenon that swept through his native Chicago suburbs with particular intensity. As a middle schooler, Kirk was surrounded by a near-universal adulation for Obama, making dissent socially costly. Yet, even then, he felt compelled to question the prevailing orthodoxy: Would Obama really fulfill his utopian promises? Was the narrative as simple as it seemed?
This instinct to push back against dominant narratives, even when unpopular, became a defining feature of Kirk’s approach. It was further fueled by his deep interest in American history and the question of what made America great—a perspective that set him apart from the more critical, anti-establishment ethos that had dominated youth culture since the 1960s.
---
## The Educational Landscape: Pre-Woke Curricula and the Search for Balance
### Encountering Pre-Woke Literature
Kirk’s school years were marked by exposure to what he calls “pre-woke” literature—books like Chinua Achebe’s *Things Fall Apart*, which presented anti-colonialist, anti-Western themes. The curriculum emphasized the evils of colonialism and the West’s role as a contaminant, often at the expense of exploring the complexities, achievements, and redemptive arcs of Western civilization.
While the focus on historical injustices like slavery was important, Kirk noticed a glaring imbalance: months spent on the horrors of slavery, but only days on the brilliance and heroism of the American founders. The curriculum, he felt, was designed to instill cynicism and guilt rather than a nuanced understanding of history.
### The Erasure of Heroes
One of the most shocking realizations for Kirk—and for many others—was the near-total absence of figures like William Wilberforce, the British Christian abolitionist who led the fight to end slavery. Despite his monumental achievements, Wilberforce is rarely mentioned in American education, even in conservative circles. Kirk and his interlocutor, Jordan Peterson, speculate that this erasure is due in part to Wilberforce’s overt Christian faith, which clashes with the secular or anti-religious narratives favored by much of the educational establishment.
This selective memory, they argue, is not just an oversight but a deliberate act of “memory-holing” that deprives students of inspiring examples of moral courage and the power of faith-driven activism.
---
## The Crisis of Meaning and the Search for Direction
### The Spiritual Dimension of the Culture War
As Kirk’s activism evolved, he came to see the culture war not merely as a political or ideological struggle, but as a fundamentally spiritual battle. The rise of “woke” ideology, the obsession with race and gender, and the increasing pathologization of masculinity are, in his view, manifestations of a deeper crisis: the loss of foundational values and the rejection of the transcendent.
This crisis is particularly acute among young men, who find themselves adrift in a hyper-feminized educational system that pathologizes their natural inclinations and offers little in the way of positive direction. The result is a generation starved for meaning, purpose, and a sense of belonging.
### The Power of Encouragement
One of the most striking observations from both Kirk and Peterson is how little encouragement it takes to inspire young people—especially young men—to aim higher and take responsibility. Whether it’s the simple act of making one’s bed or the more profound decision to pursue a life of purpose, the right words at the right time can be transformative.
Kirk’s campus events, which now draw thousands of attendees, have become a magnet for young men seeking not just political debate, but guidance on how to be better people, husbands, and fathers. The questions they ask are less about tax policy and more about character, responsibility, and the search for meaning.
---
## Building Turning Point USA: Grassroots Activism and Entrepreneurial Spirit
### The Card Table Revolution
Kirk’s approach to activism was refreshingly simple: go to college campuses, set up a card table with a provocative sign (“Big Government Sucks”), and invite students to debate and discuss. This grassroots strategy, inspired in part by the tactics of left-wing activists, was initially viewed as unseemly by the conservative establishment, which preferred more formal, institution-based approaches.
Yet, it was precisely this willingness to engage directly with students, to meet them where they were, that allowed Turning Point USA to grow from a handful of chapters to a nationwide movement. Kirk’s entrepreneurial temperament—combined with a conservative worldview—proved to be a potent combination.
### The Role of Mentorship and Philanthropy
A key turning point in Kirk’s journey was the guidance of mentors like Bill Montgomery, who recognized his entrepreneurial gifts and encouraged him to forgo college in favor of building something new. This advice, radical at the time, freed Kirk to pursue his vision without the constraints of traditional pathways.
Equally important was the support of philanthropic donors, many of whom were eager to invest in efforts to challenge the leftward drift of academia. By tapping into this underutilized pool of resources, Kirk was able to scale his organization and amplify its impact.
---
## The Evolution of Campus Discourse: From Economic Debates to Cultural Battlefields
### The Shift to Cultural Issues
In the early years, Turning Point USA’s campus debates focused primarily on economic issues—capitalism versus Marxism, the role of government, and so on. But by 2015, the focus had shifted dramatically to cultural hot-button topics: race, gender, and eventually transgenderism.
The rise of the “woke” movement, catalyzed by events like the Ferguson protests and the birth of Black Lives Matter, transformed the university landscape. What had once been spaces for open debate became increasingly authoritarian, with rigid orthodoxies and little tolerance for dissent.
### The Social Contagion of Ideology
Kirk witnessed firsthand the rapid spread of new ideologies on campus, particularly around gender and identity. In just a few years, the number of students identifying as transgender or demanding the use of preferred pronouns skyrocketed—a phenomenon he attributes to social contagion and the influence of activist administrators.
This environment, he argues, is not conducive to genuine learning or personal growth. Instead, it breeds conformity, resentment, and a sense of alienation among those who do not subscribe to the dominant narrative.
---
## The Deeper Battle: Power, Virtue, and the Corruption of Institutions
### The Temptation of Power
A recurring theme in Kirk and Peterson’s discussion is the danger of power for its own sake. Drawing on biblical narratives, they warn against those who cloak their pursuit of power in the language of virtue—claiming to stand for the oppressed while actually seeking to dominate.
This dynamic, they argue, is not unique to the left or the right; it is a perennial human temptation. The true test of virtue is not what one claims to stand for, but the actual fruits of one’s actions—do they lead to greater freedom, responsibility, and flourishing, or to division and suffering?
### The Corruption of Institutions
Both men lament the extent to which once-trusted institutions—universities, public schools, even scientific bodies—have been captured by ideologues and careerists more interested in power than truth. The result is a loss of trust, not just among conservatives, but across society.
Yet, they caution against an anti-institutional stance. The goal is not to tear down institutions, but to restore them to their original purpose: the pursuit of truth, the cultivation of virtue, and the service of the common good.
---
## The Role of Faith and the Return to Foundations
### The Rediscovery of Christian Roots
For Kirk, the journey through economics and political philosophy ultimately led him back to his Christian roots. He realized that the foundational values of the West—freedom, responsibility, the dignity of the individual—are inextricably linked to a belief in the transcendent.
This rediscovery is not just personal, but cultural. As the West drifts further from its spiritual moorings, the hunger for meaning and direction grows ever more acute. The solution, Kirk believes, is not to invent new values, but to return to the wellspring of the tradition that made the West great.
### The Call to Responsibility
Central to this tradition is the idea of ordered freedom—freedom not as license, but as the capacity to choose the good and to take responsibility for oneself and others. This is the message that resonates most deeply with the young men who flock to Kirk’s events: the invitation to step up, to aim higher, and to become the kind of person who can be trusted with freedom.
---
## The Mentor’s Mantle: From Debater to Teacher
### The Shift in Mission
As Turning Point USA has grown, so too has Kirk’s understanding of his role. What began as a quest to test his ideas and debate his peers has evolved into a mission of mentorship and leadership. No longer just a political operative, Kirk now sees himself as a teacher—albeit one who takes that responsibility with great seriousness.
This shift is reflected in the nature of the questions he receives and the way he engages with his audience. The focus is less on winning arguments and more on offering guidance, encouragement, and a model of responsible adulthood.
### The Challenge of Loving One’s Enemy
One of the most difficult but essential aspects of this new role is the challenge of engaging with those who are deeply hurt, angry, or lost—sometimes even hostile. Kirk strives to balance truth with compassion, recognizing that many of his most strident opponents are, at some level, searching for meaning and connection.
This approach echoes the biblical injunction to “love your enemy”—not as a sentimental platitude, but as a practical strategy for turning adversaries into allies and for healing the divisions that threaten to tear society apart.
---
## Looking Ahead: The Future of Conservative Advocacy
### A Rebellion of Men
Kirk predicts that the coming years will see a “rebellion of the men of the West”—a grassroots movement of young men seeking to reclaim their place in society, not through aggression or reaction, but through a renewed commitment to responsibility, virtue, and the pursuit of meaning.
This movement, he argues, is not primarily political, but cultural and spiritual. The political battles are merely the aftershocks of deeper shifts in values and identity.
### The Mission: Healing the West
Kirk’s ultimate goal is to help the West heal by bringing it back to its roots—a society grounded in faith, freedom, and responsibility. This is not a call for nostalgia or reaction, but for a “new birth of freedom” that draws on the best of the past to meet the challenges of the present.
He sees his work not as an end in itself, but as part of a larger movement to restore the foundations of Western civilization and to offer young people a path to meaning, purpose, and flourishing.
---
## Conclusion: Lessons for a Generation in Search of Meaning
Charlie Kirk’s story is more than a tale of political entrepreneurship; it is a case study in the search for meaning in a time of crisis. His journey—from high school activist to national leader, from debater to mentor—offers valuable lessons for anyone seeking to navigate the complexities of modern life.
At its core, his message is simple but profound: The path to a better future lies not in cynicism or despair, but in the rediscovery of foundational values, the embrace of responsibility, and the willingness to aim higher. In a world hungry for direction, those who answer the call—“Here I am”—may yet lead the way.
Summary from https://gist.ly/youtube-summarizer
## The Journey of Conservative Advocacy: Lessons from Charlie Kirk’s Rise
In the ever-evolving landscape of American culture and politics, few stories are as compelling as that of Charlie Kirk, the founder and leader of Turning Point USA. His journey from a high school student concerned about cookie prices to the architect of the largest conservative youth organization in the world offers a unique lens through which to examine the challenges, transformations, and opportunities facing young people—especially young men—in the West today.
This article explores the roots of Kirk’s political awakening, the cultural and educational forces that shaped his worldview, the rise of campus activism, and the deeper spiritual and philosophical questions that underpin the current culture wars. Along the way, it draws out lessons for anyone seeking meaning, purpose, and a productive path forward in a time of profound societal upheaval.
---
## Early Influences: From Cookie Advocacy to Political Awakening
### The Humble Beginnings
Charlie Kirk’s political journey began in an unexpected place: a high school campaign against “cookie inflation.” At 16 or 17, he and his peers noticed that the price of homemade cookies at their school had nearly tripled in a year. In response, they formed “Students Against Cookie Inflation,” a tongue-in-cheek but earnest effort to address what felt like a pressing issue at the time.
Looking back, Kirk admits with a laugh that perhaps he should have been advocating for healthier food options, like reducing the price of hamburgers or steaks. Yet, this seemingly trivial campaign was the spark that ignited his passion for advocacy and organizing.
### The Obama Era and a Spirit of Dissent
Kirk’s formative years coincided with the meteoric rise of Barack Obama, a political phenomenon that swept through his native Chicago suburbs with particular intensity. As a middle schooler, Kirk was surrounded by a near-universal adulation for Obama, making dissent socially costly. Yet, even then, he felt compelled to question the prevailing orthodoxy: Would Obama really fulfill his utopian promises? Was the narrative as simple as it seemed?
This instinct to push back against dominant narratives, even when unpopular, became a defining feature of Kirk’s approach. It was further fueled by his deep interest in American history and the question of what made America great—a perspective that set him apart from the more critical, anti-establishment ethos that had dominated youth culture since the 1960s.
---
## The Educational Landscape: Pre-Woke Curricula and the Search for Balance
### Encountering Pre-Woke Literature
Kirk’s school years were marked by exposure to what he calls “pre-woke” literature—books like Chinua Achebe’s *Things Fall Apart*, which presented anti-colonialist, anti-Western themes. The curriculum emphasized the evils of colonialism and the West’s role as a contaminant, often at the expense of exploring the complexities, achievements, and redemptive arcs of Western civilization.
While the focus on historical injustices like slavery was important, Kirk noticed a glaring imbalance: months spent on the horrors of slavery, but only days on the brilliance and heroism of the American founders. The curriculum, he felt, was designed to instill cynicism and guilt rather than a nuanced understanding of history.
### The Erasure of Heroes
One of the most shocking realizations for Kirk—and for many others—was the near-total absence of figures like William Wilberforce, the British Christian abolitionist who led the fight to end slavery. Despite his monumental achievements, Wilberforce is rarely mentioned in American education, even in conservative circles. Kirk and his interlocutor, Jordan Peterson, speculate that this erasure is due in part to Wilberforce’s overt Christian faith, which clashes with the secular or anti-religious narratives favored by much of the educational establishment.
This selective memory, they argue, is not just an oversight but a deliberate act of “memory-holing” that deprives students of inspiring examples of moral courage and the power of faith-driven activism.
---
## The Crisis of Meaning and the Search for Direction
### The Spiritual Dimension of the Culture War
As Kirk’s activism evolved, he came to see the culture war not merely as a political or ideological struggle, but as a fundamentally spiritual battle. The rise of “woke” ideology, the obsession with race and gender, and the increasing pathologization of masculinity are, in his view, manifestations of a deeper crisis: the loss of foundational values and the rejection of the transcendent.
This crisis is particularly acute among young men, who find themselves adrift in a hyper-feminized educational system that pathologizes their natural inclinations and offers little in the way of positive direction. The result is a generation starved for meaning, purpose, and a sense of belonging.
### The Power of Encouragement
One of the most striking observations from both Kirk and Peterson is how little encouragement it takes to inspire young people—especially young men—to aim higher and take responsibility. Whether it’s the simple act of making one’s bed or the more profound decision to pursue a life of purpose, the right words at the right time can be transformative.
Kirk’s campus events, which now draw thousands of attendees, have become a magnet for young men seeking not just political debate, but guidance on how to be better people, husbands, and fathers. The questions they ask are less about tax policy and more about character, responsibility, and the search for meaning.
---
## Building Turning Point USA: Grassroots Activism and Entrepreneurial Spirit
### The Card Table Revolution
Kirk’s approach to activism was refreshingly simple: go to college campuses, set up a card table with a provocative sign (“Big Government Sucks”), and invite students to debate and discuss. This grassroots strategy, inspired in part by the tactics of left-wing activists, was initially viewed as unseemly by the conservative establishment, which preferred more formal, institution-based approaches.
Yet, it was precisely this willingness to engage directly with students, to meet them where they were, that allowed Turning Point USA to grow from a handful of chapters to a nationwide movement. Kirk’s entrepreneurial temperament—combined with a conservative worldview—proved to be a potent combination.
### The Role of Mentorship and Philanthropy
A key turning point in Kirk’s journey was the guidance of mentors like Bill Montgomery, who recognized his entrepreneurial gifts and encouraged him to forgo college in favor of building something new. This advice, radical at the time, freed Kirk to pursue his vision without the constraints of traditional pathways.
Equally important was the support of philanthropic donors, many of whom were eager to invest in efforts to challenge the leftward drift of academia. By tapping into this underutilized pool of resources, Kirk was able to scale his organization and amplify its impact.
---
## The Evolution of Campus Discourse: From Economic Debates to Cultural Battlefields
### The Shift to Cultural Issues
In the early years, Turning Point USA’s campus debates focused primarily on economic issues—capitalism versus Marxism, the role of government, and so on. But by 2015, the focus had shifted dramatically to cultural hot-button topics: race, gender, and eventually transgenderism.
The rise of the “woke” movement, catalyzed by events like the Ferguson protests and the birth of Black Lives Matter, transformed the university landscape. What had once been spaces for open debate became increasingly authoritarian, with rigid orthodoxies and little tolerance for dissent.
### The Social Contagion of Ideology
Kirk witnessed firsthand the rapid spread of new ideologies on campus, particularly around gender and identity. In just a few years, the number of students identifying as transgender or demanding the use of preferred pronouns skyrocketed—a phenomenon he attributes to social contagion and the influence of activist administrators.
This environment, he argues, is not conducive to genuine learning or personal growth. Instead, it breeds conformity, resentment, and a sense of alienation among those who do not subscribe to the dominant narrative.
---
## The Deeper Battle: Power, Virtue, and the Corruption of Institutions
### The Temptation of Power
A recurring theme in Kirk and Peterson’s discussion is the danger of power for its own sake. Drawing on biblical narratives, they warn against those who cloak their pursuit of power in the language of virtue—claiming to stand for the oppressed while actually seeking to dominate.
This dynamic, they argue, is not unique to the left or the right; it is a perennial human temptation. The true test of virtue is not what one claims to stand for, but the actual fruits of one’s actions—do they lead to greater freedom, responsibility, and flourishing, or to division and suffering?
### The Corruption of Institutions
Both men lament the extent to which once-trusted institutions—universities, public schools, even scientific bodies—have been captured by ideologues and careerists more interested in power than truth. The result is a loss of trust, not just among conservatives, but across society.
Yet, they caution against an anti-institutional stance. The goal is not to tear down institutions, but to restore them to their original purpose: the pursuit of truth, the cultivation of virtue, and the service of the common good.
---
## The Role of Faith and the Return to Foundations
### The Rediscovery of Christian Roots
For Kirk, the journey through economics and political philosophy ultimately led him back to his Christian roots. He realized that the foundational values of the West—freedom, responsibility, the dignity of the individual—are inextricably linked to a belief in the transcendent.
This rediscovery is not just personal, but cultural. As the West drifts further from its spiritual moorings, the hunger for meaning and direction grows ever more acute. The solution, Kirk believes, is not to invent new values, but to return to the wellspring of the tradition that made the West great.
### The Call to Responsibility
Central to this tradition is the idea of ordered freedom—freedom not as license, but as the capacity to choose the good and to take responsibility for oneself and others. This is the message that resonates most deeply with the young men who flock to Kirk’s events: the invitation to step up, to aim higher, and to become the kind of person who can be trusted with freedom.
---
## The Mentor’s Mantle: From Debater to Teacher
### The Shift in Mission
As Turning Point USA has grown, so too has Kirk’s understanding of his role. What began as a quest to test his ideas and debate his peers has evolved into a mission of mentorship and leadership. No longer just a political operative, Kirk now sees himself as a teacher—albeit one who takes that responsibility with great seriousness.
This shift is reflected in the nature of the questions he receives and the way he engages with his audience. The focus is less on winning arguments and more on offering guidance, encouragement, and a model of responsible adulthood.
### The Challenge of Loving One’s Enemy
One of the most difficult but essential aspects of this new role is the challenge of engaging with those who are deeply hurt, angry, or lost—sometimes even hostile. Kirk strives to balance truth with compassion, recognizing that many of his most strident opponents are, at some level, searching for meaning and connection.
This approach echoes the biblical injunction to “love your enemy”—not as a sentimental platitude, but as a practical strategy for turning adversaries into allies and for healing the divisions that threaten to tear society apart.
---
## Looking Ahead: The Future of Conservative Advocacy
### A Rebellion of Men
Kirk predicts that the coming years will see a “rebellion of the men of the West”—a grassroots movement of young men seeking to reclaim their place in society, not through aggression or reaction, but through a renewed commitment to responsibility, virtue, and the pursuit of meaning.
This movement, he argues, is not primarily political, but cultural and spiritual. The political battles are merely the aftershocks of deeper shifts in values and identity.
### The Mission: Healing the West
Kirk’s ultimate goal is to help the West heal by bringing it back to its roots—a society grounded in faith, freedom, and responsibility. This is not a call for nostalgia or reaction, but for a “new birth of freedom” that draws on the best of the past to meet the challenges of the present.
He sees his work not as an end in itself, but as part of a larger movement to restore the foundations of Western civilization and to offer young people a path to meaning, purpose, and flourishing.
---
## Conclusion: Lessons for a Generation in Search of Meaning
Charlie Kirk’s story is more than a tale of political entrepreneurship; it is a case study in the search for meaning in a time of crisis. His journey—from high school activist to national leader, from debater to mentor—offers valuable lessons for anyone seeking to navigate the complexities of modern life.
At its core, his message is simple but profound: The path to a better future lies not in cynicism or despair, but in the rediscovery of foundational values, the embrace of responsibility, and the willingness to aim higher. In a world hungry for direction, those who answer the call—“Here I am”—may yet lead the way.