2/3
But to what end? Jewish controlled Tommy Robinson misleads and thwarts the agency of working class Britons who are upset at the 1000s of children raped by Muslim gangs with the connivance of corrupt government and authorities.
To what end was Peterson engineered into the public psyche and signal boosted in the media?
Well if the ‘young white males’ who make up his followers (as we are so often told) were to look into what is being done to them and how they are struggling they would invariably come across the same malefactors.
The Zionist power brokers who control Finance, Media, Governments etc.
Another poster on here (Roe vs Wade thread) said, (and I paraphrase):
"An Instagram account which usually centres around labour and the frustrations of workers not being paid what they feel they are worth is called @****ouiquit. The problem is that our economies have been finance based instead of labor based, and that as a result, labor and the average person gets progressively more screwed while the mostly Jewish financiers at the top get fabulously wealthy.
We see this all over the place now, but one thing missing is the supposed focus on labor, which many theorise was an element removed from the debate when people like Jewish Foucault and the Jewish Frankfurt School made the deal with the modern left:
"Give us unlimited sexual liberation, and we will not criticize your economic system"
Since then (about the mid to late seventies) we've witnessed the interests of labour take a back seat on the supposedly labor-friendly political party platforms (Labour in the UK and Democrat in the USA, etc). Middle school students used to learn about Caesar Chavez, a Mexican immigrant farm worker who fought against cheap illegal Mexican labor. What are the chances anyone under the age of 50 knows who he was? Crickets.
This instagram account which is supposedly concerned with worker rights dropped everything once the Roe overturn was announced and has been parroting nonstop pro abortion snark for the past 24 hours. Just as with Occupy Wall St, it was that easy to take a supposedly economic based / labour based movement and derail it by inserting feminism-sexual liberation into the discussion. Labour will always lose if they can't get past the idea that sexual "liberation" is more important than everything else."
Peterson will skirt around that but he will NEVER name the Jewish ideological origins of all this woke nonsense: be it Trans, be it Feminism, be it CRT/BLM, etc etc.
Jewish Power-brokers are disproportionately represented in the leadership circles of the White House, the Senate and Congress, Wall Street, International Banking and Finance, the Media, Publishing, Big Tech, Hollywood, Ivy League Universities.
They control the system that is short changing young men.
This is where Peterson’s Timothy Leary “Pied Piper” role comes in..
JP also is an academic/pop cult figure who built a large following among young men, and like Leary he received a lot of help from the establishment in building up his massive following.
His message is aimed at right-leaning young men, and like Leary's it also leads them to become atomized indiviuals, as it is a message of generic self-help that de-emphasizes family, faith and nation, just as Leary's 1960s programming did.
Peterson advocates a very truncated form of family and faith, completely removed from the notion of nation, which is the extension and full manifestation of those ideals.
His truncated version of family and faith is pretty much the version the CEOs, freemasons and WEF Bosses want for us.
Many will say: ”Peterson doesn't de-emphasize family and faith - he often talks about how having a family and children is the right course of action for the vast majority of people and how religion is the fundamentally important bedrock of Western civilization and ethics"
And his dalliances into Christian faith only mimic those of a true believer, ask Jordan Peterson if he is a Christian and you will be subjected to 10 minutes of Mumbo Jumbo.
Interesting that he constantly name checks the likes of PragerU, another gatekeeping venue that opposes somewhat feminism, radical leftism, now pokes the odd holes in climate change.
They have to give you some truth or people would leave.
PragerU similar to the Jordan will strongly support Jewish, Asian, African, Somali Nationalism but criticise any ethnic nationalism for any White Western tribe.
At this time - the first gatekeeper question is: "Are you for giving other Western countries the same nationalist right of existence as Israel?" If the answer is no, then you know that the guy is a clear globalist agent (PragerU/Daily Wire/Lotus Eaters etc).
To paraphrase another poster:
The elites know feminism etc will push the men who have their heads screwed on rightward. Jordan Peterson exists to try to make sure not too many fall off their table.
He says things that appeal to masculinity, but stops short on several crucial points.
The main ones being the need for collectivisation as a national, European descended people and a culture …and as others have pointed out his unwillingness to point a finger at the Jewish Power brokers. It seems like he's just there with a safe version of masculinity to try to stop people from exiting the playing field completely.
I think there is a risk to what he's doing (by which I mean a risk to the elites) that men who are switched on will go the whole hog and embrace the Truth. But my guess is that they consider it worth the risk for all the stuck half-realized men he inspires, who don't have anyone else to take them where they should be.
Looking at the efforts of Balsillie etc. it would make sense that the globalist elites want the edges of their playing field controlled with safety nets.
With the internet people will do research and they will find out that they are being lied to about Covid and then, by doing some digging, they find out about 9/11, the Frankfurt School, then WWII and then about the crimes of the Jewish Zionists in killing 10s of millions in Turkey, the Soviet Union and China.
Nobel prize winners like Solzhenitsyn and their writing are a source of these red pills.
Now.. look at that. Peterson is a self-appointed ‘expert’ on Solzhenitsyn.
He lectures and lectures away on “The Gulag Archipelago” Mention Solzhenitsyn and many will associate him directly with Peterson through whom they heard about him.
A very notable example of Peterson shilling for his masters is his constant distortion and misapropriation of Solzhenitsyn's work for his globalist-compatible cult. He likes to portray himself as some kind of modern heroic figure in the mold of a Solzhenitsyn, while completely ignoring the fact that Bolshevism was a Jewish movement, as Solzhenitsyn outlined in his works which were subsequently censored.
If Peterson does not want to get involved in the “Jewish Question” or Solzhenitzyn's book '200 Years Together' to protect his position and financials that would be fine. But he has chosen to address it on behalf of his masters and lie multiple times.
We have discussed the video in which he gets questioned by an audience member about the hatred of the Jewish Bolsheviks for the Christian Russians and Christian Ukrainians that they slaughtered in their millions.
As mentioned the audience member gives him a copy of “200 Years Together” and Peterson says that “I haven’t read it”. The guy who is the self appointed expert on Solzhenitsyn?
He’s asked the question and he responds that “there is a lot to disentangle there”, promises to actually read the book and then says that he “can’t”
His obedient audience cheers when he says that he won’t engage with the question.
“Tell the Truth or at least, don’t lie” yet Peterson ignores his own advice. Tell the truth JP and talk about the people who put so much into communism. The people whose fingerprints are all over so much misery. JP's integrity is totally compromised.
So the cucking is nothing new.
But that was the point all along, from back in 2004.. wasn't it... when they were “looking for new voices”.
Remember, all Jewish success is due to high IQ and we should be happy and grateful to have such geniuses ruling over us. Does that sound like a principled and trustworthy person?
https://www.jordanbpeterson.com/psychology/on-the-so-called-jewish-question/
He lied about the Ashkenazi IQ using data in a completely obtuse manner.
Now where this becomes an issue is the anger that Northwest Asian students (Japanese, Korean, Taiwanese, Hong Kong descended etc) feel at being denied entry to Ivy League Universities. Harvard under jewish leadership basically runs a racial quota for admissions, boosting the representation of less intelligent blacks and making it much harder for Asians to get on to courses for which they are far more qualified aptitudinally.
Harvard admits 56.1% of black applicants in the top academic decile, compared with 31.3% of Hispanics, 15.3% of “whites”/(((whites))), and 12.7% of Asians.
A black applicant who’s in the fourth-lowest decile “has a higher chance of admission (12.8%) than an Asian American in the top decile.” They’re effectively operating a racial quota system, illegally.
Not only that but they are massively boosting their proportional representation of jewish students by lumping them in with all-whites, accepting a massive over representation of them and then claiming that there was no nepotism. They are just ‘naturally brighter’ (all the while they penalise ‘actually brighter’ Asians).
This is the kind of lying sophistry on behalf of one race alone that Peterson engages in. And has done for a long time.