Hitler versus Rothschild: the Logistics and Background of World War Two

[JR5]

Hitler's Top Guy

This post examines the post-World War 2 life of Walloon leader and super-soldier Leon Degrelle, seen by many as the likely successor to Hitler. It seeks to answer this question: how did Degrelle maintain his relentless optimism and idealism for decades when ongoing developments regularly proved disappointing to him personally and to his cause? Was his perspective appropriate?

“What weighs upon one in exile is neither loneliness (this is often, to the contrary, a wonderful blessing) nor the bitterness of defeat, but rather it is that feeling of impotence, being unable to project all the forces that roar inside of one and to convince others born to transmit these forces as I was born to carry them. This is the torture of every day, every hour; that nothing happens.” - Leon Degrelle to a young comrade, November 11, 1961

https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/hitlers-top-guy

 

[Australia Sucks]

Even junkfood back then was so much better quality then now. The original Fanta in Germany was sweetened with Beet juice and in Netherlands it was sweetened with elderberry juice. Today American Fanta uses high fructose corn syrup.

 

[It_Is_My_Time]

 

[Острог]

Fixed that for ya.

By the way, plenty of leaders went up against insane odds yet came out on top. Those are the ones blessed by God, such as Constantine the Great. Those were intelligent men. God never knew Hitler.

Going by this failed logic you might also state that God never knew Nicolas II or Duke Alexandrovich. You don't know that.

 

[Samseau]

Going by this failed logic you might also state that God never knew Nicolas II or Duke Alexandrovich. You don't know that.

Failed logic? Alexandrovich had millions of roubles go "missing" under his command, and was completely ineffective to create a navy for Russia. Meanwhile Nicolas went to war against other Christians instead of focusing on the Talmudic threat in his midst. Both of these men were corrupt (Alexandrovich much more though) and were punished in their own lifetimes for their errors let alone what their punishments in the next life might be.

Godly men live Godly lives and even if they fail it is evident in their acts that they were trying to achieve Godly outcomes. The two men you mentioned did nothing to work towards Godly outcomes, their policies and actions were disasters.