Here are Hitlers speeches translated into English by AI you can listen to them here I just received the link, Iv only heard 1 so far.
Exposing the Lies of History: Setting the Record Straight
- Thread starter MusicForThePiano
- Start date
I'm catholic but big admirer of Fr. Seraphim Rose. I read his book Nihilism about 10 years ago and recently read it again. And although written many years ago it perfectly describes the current turmoil
Another episode of exposing lies from Blackpilled on the Waco incident:
"The Waco Lie"
"The Waco Lie"
"How They Stole Your Future 100 Years Ago - Devon Stack"
Short video, but very good and exposing.
Short video, but very good and exposing.
The 102 anniversary of this speech is coming up, on Sunday, July 28. For those who haven't heard it's reconstruction in English, now is your chance.
Wasn't sure whether to post this here or in the JQ thread, it has actually relevance for both :
Mads Palsvik on the talmudic world order
jermwarfare.com
Very well spoken Danish activist / politician. The historic details covered include The Balfour Agreement and WWI, Germans killed by the allies after 1945, discussions between Germany, Poland and England in the lead up to WW2.
Worth listening to the end. There are a few points in the middle that may bother some, but it finishes on a strong note.
Mads Palsvik on the talmudic world order
Mads Palsvig on the Talmudic World Order
Mads Palsvig argues that the Talmudic World Order is about 'Talmud followers' lying and deceiving the world so that they can change history.
jermwarfare.com
Worth listening to the end. There are a few points in the middle that may bother some, but it finishes on a strong note.
In the past, a particular state took care of its wives and mothers and promoted healthy strong families.
radicaldose.com
Woman and Mother in Germany - Radical Dose
Radical Dose reproduces an account of what the German state provided for the German woman and mother in 1938.
radicaldose.com
I know very little about Italy, but was talking about it with someone who knows a lot more.. Turns out the pre-war period was definitely not a parallel of Weimar Germany. "Faschist" Benito Mussolini was already in power in 1922 and his election was blessed at the time by the Italian monarch. It was apparently a soft dictatorship. At the end of the war, he was murdered, hung upside down along with his wife. Somehow these events led to the demise of the Italian monarchy. So Italy had a monarchy till in fact much more recently than some of the other republics which were part of WWII.
Nowadays it is very popular for Italians to visit the grave of Mussolini. I wonder if anyone is given the name Benito in modern day Italy..
Nobody is given the name Adolf in modern day Germany or Europe in general, although there are a few Adolfs still around of older generations you meet occasionally. So Mussolini has an actual grave which people visit, I believe Stalin as well, even statues in his case however I don't think in Europe there are any graves or monuments to Hitler.
So the only lie or misrepresentation I can detect is that Hitler and Mussolini are often mentioned in the same breath, but they did not really have parallel histories and the one is revered to this day while the other not, or is at least not allowed to be.
Nowadays it is very popular for Italians to visit the grave of Mussolini. I wonder if anyone is given the name Benito in modern day Italy..
Nobody is given the name Adolf in modern day Germany or Europe in general, although there are a few Adolfs still around of older generations you meet occasionally. So Mussolini has an actual grave which people visit, I believe Stalin as well, even statues in his case however I don't think in Europe there are any graves or monuments to Hitler.
So the only lie or misrepresentation I can detect is that Hitler and Mussolini are often mentioned in the same breath, but they did not really have parallel histories and the one is revered to this day while the other not, or is at least not allowed to be.
Most people don't know much about Italian history between WW1 and Mussolini's march because so much happened in such a short time. With Germany it is easy to see the cancer of Weimar growing worse by each year.
Italy was suffering from Marxist violence in the wake of WWI, as well as Versailles diktats that, though they were not as harsh as they were on Germany, were unpopular with the people. You also have to consider the Italo-Turkic war of 1911 to 1912 and how British manipulation attempted to cripple the Italian naval power in the Mediterranean. They may not have had a 14-year Weimar like Germany did, but that's because Mussolini took advantage of the situation and had more men earlier on, so he basically prevented a Weimar from forming from marching on Rome in 1922 forcing the government to surrender power. It was a clever play, and it worked well.
Being on the "winning side" of WW1 in retrospect shows us that there were no winners except for a small handful of jewish bankers and their pawns with greased pockets. The country had high unemployment, inflation, and public debt, and there was widespread discontent among the returning soldiers who felt that Italy had not received the territorial gains it was promised in the Treaty of London (1915) which created an atmosphere of frustration and anger toward the government.
The Italian working class was influenced by the successes of the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917 and they grew increasingly radicalized. Strikes, labor unrest, and the occupation of factories by socialist workers of the so-called "Biennio Rosso" or "Two Red Years" from 1919–1920, destabilized the Italian economy even further, placing a fear of socialist revolution among the middle class and elites.
The rise of left-wing violence was met with increasing calls from the Italian people for a strong government to restore law and order. The Fascist movement which Mussolini founded in 1919 began as a paramilitary organization (the Blackshirts or Squadristi) that violently opposed the socialists and communists. Mussolini solidified and positioned the Fascist Party as the only force capable of suppressing Marxist violence and saving Italy from revolution.
Ideologically, Mussolini promoted Fascism as a third way between socialism and liberal democracy. Fascism emphasized nationalism, anti-Marxism, authoritarianism, and the need for a strong state to restore Italy’s glory. Mussolini believed Italy could return to its historical greatness only under a unified, disciplined regime. Many people often say that Fascism is a variant of capitalism or communism. It is not. There is such a thing as third position politics, which I have advocated here since the forum inception and on RVF, and anytime I speak to anyone about politics in person I do the same.
Italy’s political system in the early 1920s was rife with paralysis and instability and even though the country was a constitutional monarchy the government was deeply fractured with no party able to secure a strong majority in the parliament. The liberal governments of the time were corrupt, ineffective, and unable to deal with the challenges facing the nation and had lost credibility with the public. Many of them were de facto communist sympathizers themselves. The monarchy was seen as increasingly impotent, as King Victor Emmanuel III was hesitant to take decisive action against the growing political unrest, which led to a vacuum of power. The failure of the political class to address these crises allowed Mussolini to present himself as a strong leader who could bring stability. Mussolini exploited, righteously, this lack of leadership and the political division between the monarchy and parliament.
The March on Rome was a carefully staged demonstration of Fascist strength involving 30,000 Blackshirts gathering around Rome to pressure the government into resigning. Mussolini did not actually march at the front but remained in Milan, waiting for the outcome, while others led the march. The idea was to intimidate the monarchy and the government into handing over power to the Fascists without resorting to outright violence or a coup. King Victor Emmanuel III chose to invite Mussolini to form a government, blessing his appointment to government, and also fearing civil war or revolution from the marxists. On October 29, 1922, Mussolini was appointed Prime Minister. The March on Rome marked the beginning of the Fascist dictatorship in Italy, though Mussolini would consolidate his power over the next few years, along with cleaning up the Cosa Nostra problem plaguing the southern provinces and many other great features.
Mussolini basically modernized Italy. It was General Garibaldi who united the kingdoms in the 1860s (there's a big statue of him in Roma), but Mussolini basically brought into modernity from a lot of the peasantry behavior and living in an economic and infrastructural sense, especially from the Sicilians and their criminal tendencies. He was the first leader to establish public safety as a priority.
-Mussolini invested heavily in public works development, including building roads, bridges, railways, and public buildings. The Autostrade (Italy’s motorway system) was one of the early modern highway systems in Europe which greatly improved transportation across Italy.
-His regime successfully drained the Pontine Marshes, a vast area of swampy land near Rome. This vast land reclamation project turned the marshes into fertile farmland and significantly reduced malaria in the region as well as provided land for agriculture and new settlements.
-Mussolini’s government expanded electrification throughout rural areas and modernized heavy industry (steel production, shipbuilding, etc.) to boost its economy. Under his leadership, Italy became more self-sufficient in industrial output and power generation for the first time without relying on external powers.
-His regime promoted self-sufficiency in agriculture through initiatives like the "Battle for Grain" to increase domestic wheat production and reduce reliance on foreign imports, and though there were setbacks these programs did improve agricultural efficiency in some regions which led to less starvation.
-Mussolini established the corporate state, a system in which the economy was organized into corporations representing various industries and sectors. Employers, workers, and the state worked together to settle labor disputes and manage industries to reduce class conflict and promote national unity. There were some failures but it overall improved the Italian labor structure which modern systems have both piggybacked and corrupted.
-He introduced paid vacations, social security measures, and improved pensions for certain segments of the population.
-The regime embarked on public housing projects to improve the living standards of the working class and initiated healthcare reforms that combatted malaria and tuberculosis. Mussolini’s government invested in health infrastructure and sanitation, something which the modern Italy has lost due to much of the invading aliens.
-He reformed the Italian education system by promoting patriotism, discipline, and a sense of national identity among students in the academic ethos. The curriculum was restructured to emphasize Fascist ideology and instill loyalty to the state, and he managed to increase the literacy rate and access to education in rural and poor areas.
-Mussolini heavily invested in art, architecture, and Italian cultural restoration projects. The regime funded the renovation of historic sites, promoted neo-classical and Fascist architecture, and supported the film industry, helping to elevate Italian cultural achievements. For example, the Cinecittà film studio in Rome was established during Mussolini’s rule. He had grander plans to rebuild the Colosseum but only managed to complete a section of seats to their original marble White condition which can still be viewed today.
-He promoted the development of aviation in Italy, encouraging Italians to view aviation as a symbol of national strength. Italo Balbo, one of Mussolini’s top officials, became a renowned figure in Italian aviation and was instrumental in boosting Italy’s reputation in the field during the 1930s. In his hometown much of these aviation accomplishments are on display in his birth house museum.
-His regime encouraged the promotion of sports and physical fitness as part of its vision of a strong, healthy nation. The Dopolavoro (After Work) program organized recreational activities and sports for the working class. This focus on sports was linked to the Fascist ideal of a physically strong and disciplined citizenry who would not be weakened by the corruptions of liberal democracies or marxism.
-His most important domestic achievement was his battle against La Cosa Nostra and the Marxist saboteurs. Mussolini appointed Cesare Mori as Prefect of Palermo in 1925 with the specific task of crushing the Mafia. Mori, known as the "Iron Prefect," was given extraordinary powers to use any means necessary to restore law and order in Sicily. Mori led a brutal and effective campaign against the Mafia, using a combination of police repression, military force, and mass arrests to dismantle the Mafia's operations. Mori’s tactics were harsh and uncompromising, and rightfully so. He launched raids on Mafia strongholds, often involving the military to hunt down Mafia leaders in remote villages. Just as a good Catholic cleans up his society, karlergi pawns kill him and dirty it all over again. The Mafia’s return to power began with the Allied invasion of Sicily in 1943. In their efforts to establish control the Allies sought out local Sicilian contacts, many of whom were former Mafia members or figures with ties to the Mafia, who presented themselves as local authorities and allies against the Fascists. Many Mafia bosses were released from prison, and quickly regained a foothold in Sicily by cooperating with the American and British military. The collapse of Fascist control and the instability of post-war Italy instigated by (((partisans))) and the Allied militaries allowed the Mafia to reestablish its power in Sicily and across parts of southern Italy.
-More importantly on spiritual affairs was Mussolini’s signing of the Lateran Treaty in 1929, which resolved the longstanding conflict between the Italian state and the Catholic Church. The Vatican was recognized as an independent state, and Roman Catholicism was acknowledged as the official religion of Italy, this was his most important diplomatic achievement against the cultural rot of Marxism.
He did a lot more good in 21 years than the so-called democracies have done in the last 80 years. Since his outing and death the Italian government has changed hands a whopping 69 times and they have only backpedaled everything under the gloomy EU agendas. It is a highly fragmented political landscape. These rapid turnovers are largely due to Italy’s current multi-party system and the weak executive power established by the post-World War II constitution, designed to prevent any single party or leader from consolidating too much power like Mussolini did and effectively ruling a nation in good stead.
I have been to Mussolini's crypt (Crypta Mussolini) in Predappio more than once. A beautiful region, the town is nestled on the border of a national park that is the greenest part of Italy. It is a refuge away from the effete neoliberal snobs of nearby "red city" Bologna. There are a few of his older party members still alive (they would have been late teenagers in the early 40s) one of them is almost 100 and he drives around the town in a little volkswagon with insignias on his car passing out flyers. He doesn't like people taking pictures in the souvenir store, very old school. His grandchildren are there from time to time. I've spoken to some of his great-grandchildren who were at his birth house (Casa Natale di Mussolini). I've also spoken to the guards at the crypt, it's very somber.
So in a way, Hitler and Mussolini are parallels in that they are both "third position" politically, although it was Adolf who greatly upset the plans of international jewry by completely dissociating from their Rothschild banks whereas Mussolini mostly attacked their pawns (mafia syndicates, marxists, freemasonry, foreign capitalists, etc).
As for in memoriam, well the Morgenthau plan instituted by the Allied serfs initiated their "denazification" brainwashing and scooped every German and Austrian mind down into a diseased gutter of self-loathing. However, despite all the propaganda, there were many people who prayed for Hitler and his defeat when news of his death spread.
Upon Hitler's death in 1945, the Spanish newspapers ran headlines mourning the loss of Hitler, they described him in sympathetic terms highlighting his fight against communism and his lifelong Catholicism. In addition to media tributes, a Catholic requiem mass with a eulogy was held in Madrid to honor Hitler’s death. Franco was visibly upset when the news reached him, because he now had to deal with the jackals feasting on Germany's corpse. In the time since then, Spain has held public Birthday memorials for Hitler every year, though they ceased to be publicly allowed in the 1990s. When Degrelle passed in 94 it was a big blow to the movement because a couple of Mossad agents had literally just burned his greatest work a few months earlier, a work that would have certainly interrupted the narrative and the agenda. The post-Franco far-right is still alive just not as public as they used to be. The EU police forces are a nuisance to all heritage Europeans who wish to express themselves and are not allowed to do so. Others mourned his death publicly in 1945 as well, Ante Pavelic leader of Croatia, leaders of the Japanese Military, and Haj Amin el-Husseini, the Grand Mufti who had just left Berlin before the Russians closed in, all expressed sympathy when he passed. The Iranian National Socialist movement SUMKA was started by a two Persian SS officers who fought and were wounded defending Hitler's bunker in the Battle of Berlin named Davud Monshuzadeh and Morteza Kossarian. Movements with thousands of men in many countries sprung up immediately after the war and still are so it is far to say that this man Adolf is not unloved and that his ideas are discussed unbiasedly, albeit not "officially," in any jewish-occupied territory.
There are no current official memorials for Hitler in any European country. There are some smaller ones elsewhere in the world in India and in South America (Juan Peron loved Germans), visited by many non-Whites. A lot more people love Hitler than hate him, which is something the jews would want you to think the opposite of. When the bad guys try to make someone else look bad as the fall guy for their own crimes it always backfires eventually in the court of public opinion. When they would now allow a single headstone to be erected for the man, it shows the truth. They even demarked his parents grave in the Hitler family burial plot in Leonding. The public reasoning is "they are afraid of it becoming a shrine" but the truth is they rule over our governments and can make up laws telling us who we can and cannot pray for. He is the only person in history who is not allowed to have a resting place. Secular jokes and jewish blasphemy. I've lighted a candle for Adolf Hitler many times in a Cathedral as I do for my deceased relatives to pray for their souls in the beyond, them and others in my family who fought for a Christian Europe against all the jews and their servants. over the last two centuries.
Atomic bombing of Japan was not necessary to end WWII according to Ben Norton.
US government documents admit the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not necessary to end WWII. Japan was on the verge of surrendering. The nuclear attack was the first strike in Washington’s Cold War on the Soviet Union.
The Nuclear Strikes on Japan was a political decision aimed to intimidate the Soviet Union and kick off the Cold War after the Soviets had defeated the Japanese Army in Manchuria as well as to contain China (followed by the Korean War - I will post later on this)
Essentially, it was used to eliminate the possibility of a Soviet/Sino-aligned Japan or a Post WWII German share with the Soviets. US Spy agencies was able to recruit Japanese Imperialist to lead the government in Japan as right-wing Liberal Democratic Party (LDP).
Ben Norton goes over evidence on his article & youtube in detail. I'll bullet out the evidences he shared-
geopoliticaleconomy.com
US government documents admit the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not necessary to end WWII. Japan was on the verge of surrendering. The nuclear attack was the first strike in Washington’s Cold War on the Soviet Union.
The Nuclear Strikes on Japan was a political decision aimed to intimidate the Soviet Union and kick off the Cold War after the Soviets had defeated the Japanese Army in Manchuria as well as to contain China (followed by the Korean War - I will post later on this)
Essentially, it was used to eliminate the possibility of a Soviet/Sino-aligned Japan or a Post WWII German share with the Soviets. US Spy agencies was able to recruit Japanese Imperialist to lead the government in Japan as right-wing Liberal Democratic Party (LDP).
Ben Norton goes over evidence on his article & youtube in detail. I'll bullet out the evidences he shared-
- US Department of Defense publishes an analysis "Strategic Bombing Survey" which stated very clearly "Japan would have surrendered even if the atomic bombs had not been dropped"
- Eisenhower had opposed this decision in his memoir "Mandate for Change" in his conversation with US Secretary of War Henry Stimson.
- "Stimson had notified him that Washington was planning to nuke Japan, and Eisenhower criticized the decision, stating that he had “grave misgivings” and was convinced “that Japan was already defeated and that dropping the bomb was completely unnecessary”."
- The Political reasoning behind the atomic bombing of Japan has been publicly acknowledged by US Dept of Energy Office of History pushed by the Truman Administration
- "Truman hoped to avoid having to "share" the administration of Japan with the Soviet Union"
- An Foreign Policy article by Ward Wilson, a researcher from a London Think Tank - shared this 2013 analysis in "The Bomb didn't bear Japan, Stalin did"
- “Although the bombs did force an immediate end to the war, Japan’s leaders had wanted to surrender anyway and likely would have done so before the American invasion planned for Nov. 1. Their use was, therefore, unnecessary”, he wrote
Atomic bombing of Japan was not necessary to end WWII. US gov't documents admit it - Geopolitical Economy Report
US government documents admit atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not necessary to end WWII. Japan was on verge of surrendering. Nuclear attack targeted Soviet Union, starting Cold War
geopoliticaleconomy.com
Last edited:
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were also the two largest populations of Christians in Japan, and the USA slaughtered them.
They have rebranded the term holocaust such that it only includes the alleged 6 million jews :
en.wikipedia.org
Whereas holocaust victims includes the other groups
en.wikipedia.org
It adds up to 17 million.
Does anyone ever mention the other 11 million?
Even less likely to when the branding only allows for the ((most important victims)).
It may be a crime in many places to "deny the holocaust" however the very way this stuff is labelled and branded is denying or downplaying the other 11 million alleged victims!
Can see that Soviet civilians 4.5 million and Soviet POWs are the 2nd and 3rd largest groups, no wonder Putin keeps on talking about Nazis.
I remember that video, not sure if any of you have seen it, where a documentary maker follows a delegation of the ADL around and they were taking enormous pains to make sure that the "Holodomor" did not get any attention which might allow it outcompete the "Holocaust". It seems that there are also efforts taken to make sure that "Holocaust victims" do not rival or overshadow either.
The Holocaust - Wikipedia
Whereas holocaust victims includes the other groups
Holocaust victims - Wikipedia
It adds up to 17 million.
Does anyone ever mention the other 11 million?
Even less likely to when the branding only allows for the ((most important victims)).
It may be a crime in many places to "deny the holocaust" however the very way this stuff is labelled and branded is denying or downplaying the other 11 million alleged victims!
Can see that Soviet civilians 4.5 million and Soviet POWs are the 2nd and 3rd largest groups, no wonder Putin keeps on talking about Nazis.
I remember that video, not sure if any of you have seen it, where a documentary maker follows a delegation of the ADL around and they were taking enormous pains to make sure that the "Holodomor" did not get any attention which might allow it outcompete the "Holocaust". It seems that there are also efforts taken to make sure that "Holocaust victims" do not rival or overshadow either.
Music, are you a pasta bag too? You seem very informed. Mussolinis screwup was here chained himself to Hitler. Could’ve gone the Franco / Salazar route. In fact, there are theories if he did there’d be two “first worlds” - a Spain Portugal Italy Greece and Argentina developed world to counter the Talmudic first world.
The ups and downs of 20th Century Italian Fascism will be debated forever. It was not Hitler's decision to invade Greece and Hitler often lamented that it was this move, which bound Germany by their Tripartite alliance to assist Italy, that delayed Barbarossa which was the most critical operation of the century.
I do not believe Mussolini was solely at fault for Greece due to the provocation of British Intelligence between him and Metaxas, but the idea that there would have been a United Spain / Greece / Italy bloc were it not for Mussolini allying with Hitler is historically inaccurate. All three of the Mediterranean powerhouses had conflicts with one another stemming from the Versailles Treaty (often labeled petty territorial disputes by uninformed historians) and other claims from before World War I, not to mention the issue of the Turks which Mussolini would have resolved had Greece joined him willingly. He was even planning on retaking Constantinople.
I will break it down as briefly as I can because normally this sub-topic alone is lengthy.
There is a common misunderstanding about Mussolini’s options before World War II, aligning with Franco, Salazar, or Metaxas wasn’t really a viable option at the time for Italy.
Mussolini came to power in 1922, and his foreign policy, especially regarding alliances was constantly evolving. While it's easy to look back and say he "should've gone with Franco or Salazar," the reality is that Franco didn’t have full control over Spain until 1939, after the Spanish Civil War ended. Salazar, who took power in Portugal in 1932, was similarly focused on consolidating his own regime rather than forming grand alliances across Europe.
Mussolini’s first major shift in foreign policy came in 1935, when Italy was facing sanctions from Britain and France due to the invasion of Abyssinia (Ethiopia). It was at this point that Mussolini began to realize that Italy would not get the support it needed from the Western powers, and so he sought to strengthen ties with Hitler, who did not impose sanctions on Italy and in fact supported Mussolini's ambitions. This was the real turning point. If Mussolini had not aligned with Hitler at this stage, Italy would have been isolated diplomatically in Europe.
It’s tempting to say Mussolini should have allied with Spain and Portugal, but those countries were not in a position to be serious military or diplomatic partners until after the war began. Franco didn’t want to be involved in the larger conflict, preferring neutrality, and Salazar was not in a position to offer military support of any kind. Mussolini in many ways had to make the best of the situation by aligning with the stronger power of the time, Germany, especially given the sanctions and isolation Italy was facing from the Talmudic-occupied England and France.
Now on the topic of Greece: The territorial disputes between Italy and Greece were already separate from Mussolini's alignment with Hitler. Mussolini had imperial ambitions in the Mediterranean, and these directly conflicted with Greece’s territorial interests in the Balkans and the Aegean. Italy’s occupation of Albania in 1939, along with its control over the Dodecanese Islands since 1912, was a major point of contention with Greece, irrespective of whether Mussolini had allied with Hitler. So, even if Mussolini had stayed neutral or allied with Spain and Portugal, Greece would still have been a difficult partner due to the territorial competition between Italy and Greece, which were provoked by subversive agents into open war in late 1940.
Franco's government was sympathetic to Mussolini’s Fascism, but Franco was pragmatic and didn’t want to be dragged into a war that could destabilize his newly established regime. Similarly, Salazar was focused on maintaining Portugal’s neutrality and had no real interest in joining any alliance before the war. The timing just wasn’t right for Mussolini to form such an alliance.
Delving deeper into Franco, most people never bring up the fact that he wouldn't be leading anything if it wasn't for Jose Primo de Rivera's death near the start of the Spanish war against the communists in 1936. He was highly involved in the Spanish Civil War before his execution by Republican forces in November 1936. One of José Antonio’s ambitions was to recover Gibraltar. His ideological stance was based on a vision of Spanish nationalism and imperialism, which naturally extended to the reclaiming of Gibraltar from British control. Gibraltar, held by Britain since the Treaty of Utrecht in 1713, was a thorn in Spain’s side, especially for nationalists and those who saw Spain’s historical greatness as tied to the control of the strategic Strait of Gibraltar.
José Antonio Primo de Rivera as an advocate of Spanish nationalism and empire viewed Gibraltar as part of a grander mission to restore Spain’s former glory. It was a long-standing ambition of the Spanish nationalist movement to reclaim Gibraltar, not only because of its strategic importance but also because of its symbolic value as a symbol of Spain's perceived humiliation by Britain. Franco, however, had a different set of priorities than José Antonio, and his actions regarding Gibraltar were more cautious. After José Antonio’s death in 1936, Franco, who had emerged as the leader of the Nationalist forces, did not aggressively pursue Gibraltar as a military objective. 30 years of Franco's Fascism, and 49 years of post-Franco Spain and Gibraltar is still a British Overseas Territory, and Britain continues to maintain control over it to this day. So in retrospect, Franco was a minimalist in that his efforts only bought Spain and western Europe more time to figure out their next move against the Talmudic order. Moves that have to be taken in the present and near future against all these losses.
In short, Mussolini had very limited options before the war, and aligning with Hitler was the best move Italy could make at the time, especially after the Abyssinia sanctions and the growing isolation in Europe. Spain and Portugal were neutral and had their own internal priorities. Greece, as much as Mussolini might have wanted to cooperate, was simply too embroiled in territorial disputes and internal strife to be a solid partner. According to many Hellenics, Mussolini’s ambitions in the Balkans and the Aegean were in direct competition with Greece’s territorial integrity. That premise is debatable, but it is a debate that Greece and Italy had not worked out with or without a Hitler. The British also had collars around the Greeks necks, hence why many Greeks donned SS security uniforms to dole out punishment to Balkan commies and marxists the second the Limeys were kicked out of Greece. The idea of a Spain-Portugal-Italy-Greece bloc was never realistic, given the political realities and territorial conflicts each country had at the time. Mussolini did what he had to do with the hand he was dealt.
Your suggestion of a “two first worlds” scenario, where Spain, Portugal, Italy, Greece, and Argentina form a counter to the Anglo-American world is highly speculative and ignores specific European geopolitical realities of the time. These countries, despite their nationalist tendencies, lacked the military strength, industrial power, and political cohesion to counterbalance the combined forces of Britain, the US, and France. The economic and military power of Britain and the US was far beyond what these nations could muster, even if they had formed a unified bloc. Germany was the only military powerhouse in Europe that was able to withstand the full might of world jewry's forces for almost 6 years. Franco's delicacy bought the west more time, but there's no telling what "could" have happened had Gibraltar been taken earlier, it could have changed things for the better and lead to an Axis victory or worse, brought down the entire British imperial military on Spain before the war even started (which would have destroyed the truth of WW2 escaping the Allied victory).
That is why these hypotheticals are a massive stretch. No historian must make these massive hypotheticals without considering the full context of the time. He must look in medio, the actual events, what was going on beforehand (a priori) and what followed (a posteriori) to deduce the most logical outcomes based on all factors. I base everything off of what was going on in Europe in the 1910s and 1920s compounded on centuries of conflict, followed by what we got in the 1950s and 1960s resulting from the loss of the Axis, a loss that is still felt to this very day under the suicidal limp-wristed rule of 40% bodyfat judeo-masonic servants who don't believe in God and hate their own race.
Practice your Italian and go to Predappio to speak to the people who knew him if you want to know more. There are only a handful left. Vague internet-bound generalizations don't hold up to historical scrutiny, and most of these kinds of theories come from people who've never set foot in Europe, let alone taken years of their life to understand it's intricate history, ancient, medieval, renaissance, and modern.
Last edited:
The real extermination camps in 1940s Europe were run by the Allies, after the war, a network of 50 camps where 1.5 million German POWs were starved to death under the elements with no shelters. Canadian historian James Bacque documented this in his book "Other Losses" :
Comment from a German survivor:
@dieterbarkhoff1328
6 months ago
Wow. I read the book a few years ago. I checked it out today on Wikipedia and you'll never guess that it simply concentrates on the US puppets who discredit it.
My mother spent from October 1944 until April 1947 working 12 hours a day, seven days a week in a Coal mine, then called Stalino, now Donetsk. She was 20 in October 1944, a Yugoslavian born ethnic German, a Donauschwab. She was a kindergarten teacher.
My grandfather was herded into a sports arena and murdered after 3 days without water, food or shelter. He was a vigneron. My grandmother and my aunt marched towards Klagenfurt and survived. But, yes, we all know, there is only one story, it starts and ends with H and the letter T. And, as we all know, Germany alone committed atrocity after atrocity after atrocity, don't we???????
And, it started WW1, killed Belgian babies, and poor England and France were totally blameless and innocent. Not many people are aware, for example, that the London Blitz was a German response to the repeated bombing of German cities by the noble RAAF. And Saddam Hussein had WMDs, Osama did 911, Gaddafi was...as was Noriega, Allende, and China wants to take over the world, and Putin is Hitler, and we are fighting for our Freedoms, aren't we?
Let's not mention Gaza, the West Bank, the Nakba, and we must never discuss that Zionists funded Hitler - who would never have been possible but for Versailles - and what are you talking about? What, the MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX????"
Comment from a German survivor:
@dieterbarkhoff1328
6 months ago
Wow. I read the book a few years ago. I checked it out today on Wikipedia and you'll never guess that it simply concentrates on the US puppets who discredit it.
My mother spent from October 1944 until April 1947 working 12 hours a day, seven days a week in a Coal mine, then called Stalino, now Donetsk. She was 20 in October 1944, a Yugoslavian born ethnic German, a Donauschwab. She was a kindergarten teacher.
My grandfather was herded into a sports arena and murdered after 3 days without water, food or shelter. He was a vigneron. My grandmother and my aunt marched towards Klagenfurt and survived. But, yes, we all know, there is only one story, it starts and ends with H and the letter T. And, as we all know, Germany alone committed atrocity after atrocity after atrocity, don't we???????
And, it started WW1, killed Belgian babies, and poor England and France were totally blameless and innocent. Not many people are aware, for example, that the London Blitz was a German response to the repeated bombing of German cities by the noble RAAF. And Saddam Hussein had WMDs, Osama did 911, Gaddafi was...as was Noriega, Allende, and China wants to take over the world, and Putin is Hitler, and we are fighting for our Freedoms, aren't we?
Let's not mention Gaza, the West Bank, the Nakba, and we must never discuss that Zionists funded Hitler - who would never have been possible but for Versailles - and what are you talking about? What, the MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX????"