Donald Trump: Criticism & Debate Thread

Cooper said:
Average rent in NYC is $4.5k-$5k, in a city where the great majority are renters. They are voting with their wallet.
Click to expand...
The "voters" can vote for "affordability" all they want. Just like how Africans should vote for "higher wages". To Trump's credit he actually cares somewhat about affordability but how retarded do you have to be to think the mayor is going to make groceries more affordable? Not to say the president can do much better.

There's no reason to dignify these people. Voting enthusiasts are a different kind of stupid.

The same thing with the protest vote argument. In no shape or form is Mamdani a protest vote if you're white or you live in reality. He's a protest vote in the retarded, delusion brain of your average non-white.

White people wave the flags. Browns vote for white replacement. Everything circles the drain. Wake me up when the normies do something consequential.
 
Gentlemen, the election is over. No one is looking for votes right this second. After the election everyone in office looks to make as many powerful connections as possible. Consider how the Oval Office meeting looks to Mamdani's base after hostility he expressed at Trump during his campaign. He came across as a pussycat, which you could have expected from his overall lack of gravitas and weak physical posture (though he has verbal skills superior to most politicians).
 
jayco said:
I think Trump just realizes potential power of Mamdani and wants to keep enemies close, plus doesn't want to be left in the dust behind the train of affordability demand from the public, and that train will be getting more and more popuar. He probably realizes (wisely) that any attempts to fight with Mamdani will only plunge his own popularity so he jumps on the common ground popular issues: affordabiity and lowering crime. A few young men who voted for Trump had voted for Mamdani next and I'm sure Trump is aware of that.
Click to expand...

This sounds like more of the 4D chess argument which gives Trump way too much credit. So he has a lovefest with this guy and throws MTG and other true MAGA people under the bus? Seems like a funny way of strategizing for America first. MAGA has to call a spade a spade and realize Trump is incompetent on certain issues.
 
GrecoRoman said:
This sounds like more of the 4D chess argument which gives Trump way too much credit. So he has a lovefest with this guy and throws MTG and other true MAGA people under the bus? Seems like a funny way of strategizing for America first. MAGA has to call a spade a spade and realize Trump is incompetent on certain issues.
Click to expand...
He wasn't created by Roy Cohn for no reason at all. Now we can see the exact reason, to funnel righteous anger back into satanic Reagan "conservative" policies.
 
$2,000 checks are not going to fix this. I now see the GOP getting crushed in the midterms and rightfully so, and then Trump getting impeached. The correct response to that will be "good, time to replace the GOP and one day have them face charges for all the crimes they have committed against the American people".

 
It has become extremely popular to blackpill in recent months, partly because many of us rightfully believe that Republicans in DC just do not understand what time it is, and partly because the nature of online discourse in general fuels a sort of neuroticism that generates a self-defeating mindset.

But some perspective here is necessary, because I want you to imagine anyone, let alone the President of the United States, declaring in 2012 that he intends to end all migration from the Third World and that "only REVERSE MIGRATION can fully cure this situation."

The Overton Window has shifted. This does not guarantee victory, but it enables a battle to be fought in the first place. And there hasn't been a real battle over immigration policy that hasn't been over "how many more infinite migrants should we bring over?" since the early 20th century.

We're no longer debating how liberal our immigration policy should be. We're now, at long last, debating who belongs in this country and who doesn't.

For those who have been involved in politics for more than 10 years, we almost lack the words to describe how monumental a shift that is.
Click to expand...

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top