Destabilization of US Cities: Crime, Homelessness, Liberalism

The Penitent Man said:
It’s not dereliction of duty, she’s an accomplice. She deserves the death penalty, absolutely nothing less, and even more than the perpetrator because she has abused a position of authority to ensure he was free to kill.
Click to expand...
Could probably take it a step further. I’d book it as an act of treason. We all KNOW her motivation for dereliction of duty. She betrayed the people of her town to wage war on the American people due to grievances - either real or imagined. We all know when she got the news she’s patting herself on the back.
 
KulturedKaveman said:
Could probably take it a step further. I’d book it as an act of treason. We all KNOW her motivation for dereliction of duty. She betrayed the people of her town to wage war on the American people due to grievances - either real or imagined. We all know when she got the news she’s patting herself on the back.
Click to expand...
Exactly. And this is where a real executive would step in to play, in making things like this happen. We don’t and won’t have one of those and haven’t had one for at least a century (perhaps save Nixon, who seemed understand the imperative).
 
The Penitent Man said:
It’s not dereliction of duty, she’s an accomplice. She deserves the death penalty, absolutely nothing less, and even more than the perpetrator because she has abused a position of authority to ensure he was free to kill.
Click to expand...


I doubt any Judge can jail someone for a crime they haven’t committed yet. Decarlis had a number of misdemeanors, and felonies and after serving his time, they (the judges, justice department, courts) let him out.

Unless there’s something more(such as committing a crime while in jail), they couldn’t keep him locked up forever
 
homersheineken said:
Click to expand...

First off that clip needs context. This is a big trick the leftists use on us all the time. I call it soundbite chicken. The kid in the video clip might be justified in using violence. If he’s walking down the street and getting beaten up by a bunch of skinheads every day, he has a right to fight back and defend himself. Id even say unload on the skinheads.

But of course we know the posters of this don’t care about context. They just be like “oppressed people have the right to be violent.” Problem is what is oppression? When it’s self defined it’s just an excuse to be violent. To me oppression is having the fruits of my labor stolen and being forced to live in squalor. An EBT card not working and not getting enough freebies is not oppression. Knifing a refuge =/= slave revolt. Calm down blm.
 

“The right will continue to shield liberals from natural selection.”
Click to expand...

How do we stop this self-destructive mindset on the right of seeing liberals as people we can coexist with? I think it begins with this verse:

2 Chronicles 19:2
And Jehu the son of Hanani the seer went out to meet him, and said to king Jehoshaphat, Shouldest thou help the ungodly, and love them that hate the Lord? therefore is wrath upon thee from before the Lord.
Click to expand...

We as Christians need to learn to hate these people. Hate is not antithetical to Christian life. It’s justified in cases of evil.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top