Critique of evolution

If evolution is simple all about survivability and reproducing it does seem things such as consciousness, intelligence, and the other attributes that associated with the soul would be unnecessary. A being like a cockroach as mentioned in the above post or something like a rat would be the ideal if evolution was the truth.
 
Bacteria are even better suited for survival in all types of environments, supposedly they're found in active volcanic zones too, they would be here if all bugs were gone as they are "older" in evolutionary terms. What kind of conditions would have caused them to develop further when bacteria are the epitome of evolutionary success.

But then it's even better to be inanimate matter. There is no real reason for existence, so it must come from outside of this world, from without, there's nothing here that would precipitate the emergence of life. Therefore the necessity of a creator is obvious.
 
Back
Top