Christianity in Africa

Giordano Bruno

Oriental Orthodox
Heritage
I recently got into an argument with a co-worker about Christianity being colonialist because of what Portugal and Spain did in the 16th and following centuries.

Colonialism is of course good, but I see no reason to bring that up with someone so far left. As Christ said, "I fed you with milk not wine, for ye were not ready. Ye still are not ready."

This brought me to a strange line of thought. Ethiopia was surrounded by Muslims on three sides and Pagans one one since the 7th century. By the 10th it was just Muslims.

They were fought by Muslims for over 1200 years, and did not break.

So, what were the other Christian Kingdoms in Africa doing?

Well, I've not heard of any, so perhaps they were none. Thus, if all of Africa refused Christ, and attacked the noble Ethiopia since it had received the good news in Acts 8, then the Portuguese and Spanish invasion were thus rightful rebuke for over a thousand and four hundred years of Pagan and Muslim invasion.

Acts 8:26-38
King James Version
26 And the angel of the Lord spake unto Philip, saying, Arise, and go toward the south unto the way that goeth down from Jerusalem unto Gaza, which is desert.

27 And he arose and went: and, behold, a man of Ethiopia, an eunuch of great authority under Candace queen of the Ethiopians, who had the charge of all her treasure, and had come to Jerusalem for to worship,

28 Was returning, and sitting in his chariot read Esaias the prophet.

29 Then the Spirit said unto Philip, Go near, and join thyself to this chariot.

30 And Philip ran thither to him, and heard him read the prophet Esaias, and said, Understandest thou what thou readest?

31 And he said, How can I, except some man should guide me? And he desired Philip that he would come up and sit with him.

32 The place of the scripture which he read was this, He was led as a sheep to the slaughter; and like a lamb dumb before his shearer, so opened he not his mouth:

33 In his humiliation his judgment was taken away: and who shall declare his generation? for his life is taken from the earth.

34 And the eunuch answered Philip, and said, I pray thee, of whom speaketh the prophet this? of himself, or of some other man?

35 Then Philip opened his mouth, and began at the same scripture, and preached unto him Jesus.

36 And as they went on their way, they came unto a certain water: and the eunuch said, See, here is water; what doth hinder me to be baptized?

37 And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.

38 And he commanded the chariot to stand still: and they went down both into the water, both Philip and the eunuch; and he baptized him.

The Portuguese colonised Africa, starting with Morocco in 1415.

The Second Christian country, not just a country with Christians in it, but a country which had Christianity as it's official religion, was the Kongo, in 1491, 76 years afterwards.


So, the very colonisation of Africa can be seen as rightful judgement from God for over 1400 years of invasions upon Ethiopia and Christian persecution.

The Legends of the King Prester John, who is believed to have been an Ethiopian King claimed his Kingdom was lost to Pagans.


King Tewodros II of Ethiopia suffered invasions from Somalia and rebellions in the 19th century, because he ended slavery. The only people to send him aid were the British. Queen Victoria for reasons I have yet to uncover, sent limited aid, leading to him holding the Diplomat Cameron as a prisoner, but she was so upset over the outcome that she took his son Alemayehu and raised him as her own.


My conclusion from this is that unlike England, which became Christian when King Æthelberht of Kent searched for salvation, or Óengus mac Nad Froích, or Clovis I, ot Constantine I...

All of Africa clung to Paganism and Islam both for 1400 years except for Ethiopia alone, which had Christian blood from Moses who married an Ethiopian wife.
 
I recently got into an argument with a co-worker about Christianity being colonialist because of what Portugal and Spain did in the 16th and following centuries.

Colonialism is of course good, but I see no reason to bring that up with someone so far left. As Christ said, "I fed you with milk not wine, for ye were not ready. Ye still are not ready."

This brought me to a strange line of thought. Ethiopia was surrounded by Muslims on three sides and Pagans one one since the 7th century. By the 10th it was just Muslims.

They were fought by Muslims for over 1200 years, and did not break.

So, what were the other Christian Kingdoms in Africa doing?

Well, I've not heard of any, so perhaps they were none. Thus, if all of Africa refused Christ, and attacked the noble Ethiopia since it had received the good news in Acts 8, then the Portuguese and Spanish invasion were thus rightful rebuke for over a thousand and four hundred years of Pagan and Muslim invasion.

Acts 8:26-38
King James Version
26 And the angel of the Lord spake unto Philip, saying, Arise, and go toward the south unto the way that goeth down from Jerusalem unto Gaza, which is desert.

27 And he arose and went: and, behold, a man of Ethiopia, an eunuch of great authority under Candace queen of the Ethiopians, who had the charge of all her treasure, and had come to Jerusalem for to worship,

28 Was returning, and sitting in his chariot read Esaias the prophet.

29 Then the Spirit said unto Philip, Go near, and join thyself to this chariot.

30 And Philip ran thither to him, and heard him read the prophet Esaias, and said, Understandest thou what thou readest?

31 And he said, How can I, except some man should guide me? And he desired Philip that he would come up and sit with him.

32 The place of the scripture which he read was this, He was led as a sheep to the slaughter; and like a lamb dumb before his shearer, so opened he not his mouth:

33 In his humiliation his judgment was taken away: and who shall declare his generation? for his life is taken from the earth.

34 And the eunuch answered Philip, and said, I pray thee, of whom speaketh the prophet this? of himself, or of some other man?

35 Then Philip opened his mouth, and began at the same scripture, and preached unto him Jesus.

36 And as they went on their way, they came unto a certain water: and the eunuch said, See, here is water; what doth hinder me to be baptized?

37 And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.

38 And he commanded the chariot to stand still: and they went down both into the water, both Philip and the eunuch; and he baptized him.

The Portuguese colonised Africa, starting with Morocco in 1415.

The Second Christian country, not just a country with Christians in it, but a country which had Christianity as it's official religion, was the Kongo, in 1491, 76 years afterwards.


So, the very colonisation of Africa can be seen as rightful judgement from God for over 1400 years of invasions upon Ethiopia and Christian persecution.

The Legends of the King Prester John, who is believed to have been an Ethiopian King claimed his Kingdom was lost to Pagans.


King Tewodros II of Ethiopia suffered invasions from Somalia and rebellions in the 19th century, because he ended slavery. The only people to send him aid were the British. Queen Victoria for reasons I have yet to uncover, sent limited aid, leading to him holding the Diplomat Cameron as a prisoner, but she was so upset over the outcome that she took his son Alemayehu and raised him as her own.


My conclusion from this is that unlike England, which became Christian when King Æthelberht of Kent searched for salvation, or Óengus mac Nad Froích, or Clovis I, ot Constantine I...

All of Africa clung to Paganism and Islam both for 1400 years except for Ethiopia alone, which had Christian blood from Moses who married an Ethiopian wife.
Careful now, some posters were banned from Roosh's forum simply for pointing out that the Ethiopian Tewahedo Orthodox Church is oldest Orthodox Church in the world.
(Brace yourself for the incoming tsunami of BS from spergy "Orthobros" who would be shouting: "They are not Orthodox! They are schismatics ! "etc etc")
 
Last edited:
.

So, what were the other Christian Kingdoms in Africa doing?

Well, I've not heard of any, so perhaps they were none. Thus, if all of Africa refused Christ, and attacked the noble Ethiopia since it had received the good news in Acts 8, then the Portuguese and Spanish invasion were thus rightful rebuke for over a thousand and four hundred years of Pagan and Muslim invasion.

In the 5th and 6th century Byzantine missionaries (both mono and diophysite) had started evangelizing amongst the Nubian peoples and entities upstream the Nile. These Nubian Kingdoms existed roughly in the area of contemporary Northern and Central Sudan, and Southern Egypt. Before this area was home to the ancient Kush and Meroe Kingdoms, both heavily Egyptianized Nubian entities that ruled.

The Nubian Kingdom of Nobatia was the first state to embrace Coptic Christianity in 543 AD. Makuria, located southward, embraced Byzantine Chalcedonian Christianity not much later after serious scheming - in the 8th century Makuria switched to Coptic Christianity anyway. Alodia, the southernmost Kingdom, embraced Coptic Christianity in 580.

Coptic bishops in the Nubian Kingdoms were appointed by the Patriarch in Alexandria. The Nubians fought off several Islamic invasions in the 7th and 8th century, yet the ruler of the last Kingdom standing (Makuria) converted to Islam in the 14th century. Makuria eventually was conquered by the Fanj Sultanate a century later.

images - 2025-05-15T175246.714.jpeg
 
One of my favorite episodes of Christianity in Africa, from Wikipedia...
Kaleb (Ge'ez: ካሌብ, Latin: Caleb), also known as Elesbaan (Ge'ez: እለ አጽብሐ, Koinē Greek: Ἐλεσβαᾶς), was King of Aksum, which was situated in what is now Ethiopia and Eritrea.

Procopius, John of Ephesus, and other contemporary historians recount Kaleb's invasion of Yemen around 520, against the Himyarite king Yūsuf As'ar Yath'ar, known as Dhu Nuwas, a Jewish convert who was persecuting the Christian community of Najran. After much fighting, Kaleb's soldiers eventually routed Yusuf's forces. They killed the king, allowing Kaleb to appoint Sumyafa Ashwa, a native Christian (named Esimiphaios by Procopius), as his viceroy of Himyar.

As a result of his protection of the Christians, Kaleb is known as Saint Elesbaan after the sixteenth-century Cardinal Caesar Baronius added him to his edition of the Roman Martyrology despite his being a Miaphysite.
BLM or no BLM, that's one black man Hollywood will never be making a movie about.

Also, "colonialist" or not, many Africans are today pious Christians and ironically are fighting against neo-colonial Western zogbots who are trying to corrupt their traditional societies. For example the Nigerian Catholic Obianuju Ekeocha who is frequently facing American and European NGO types and the UN who are promoting abortion and even pornography.

 
Careful now, some posters were banned from Roosh's forum simply for pointing out that the Ethiopian Tewahedo Orthodox Church is oldest Orthodox Church in the world.
(Brace yourself for the incoming tsunami of BS from spergy "Orthobros" who would be shouting: "They are not Orthodox! They are schismatics ! "etc etc")

OK Mr. Chip-On-My-Shoulder, I'll bite. In what world is the Ethiopian Church older than the churches in Jerusalem & Antioch?
 
OK Mr. Chip-On-My-Shoulder, I'll bite. In what world is the Ethiopian Church older than the churches in Jerusalem & Antioch?
I think he means as a state church. Antioch and Jerusalem were large and flourishing, but when Ethiopia made Orthodoxy official, Diocletian was still being himself.

You combine this factoid with Nubian monks and missionaries Christianity is arguably more indigenous to Africa than Islam which Afro-Centrics seem to love.
 
I think he means as a state church. Antioch and Jerusalem were large and flourishing, but when Ethiopia made Orthodoxy official, Diocletian was still being himself.

You combine this factoid with Nubian monks and missionaries Christianity is arguably more indigenous to Africa than Islam which Afro-Centrics seem to love.

If that's what he means then perhaps he should say what he means instead of saying something different from what he means that's not true.
 
Back
Top