Charlie Kirk Thread

scorpion said:
The recent trans shooting at the Catholic school; the senseless, unprovoked murder of the young woman in Charlotte by a black career criminal; now the assassination of Charlie Kirk - what we see here is a trifecta of leftist bloodlust that perfectly encapsulates what the modern left has become: a death cult comprised of degenerates, misfits, aggrieved minorities, and unhinged violent lunatics. It is simply not possible to share a society with millions of people who are determined to destroy it, and who are prepared to kill anyone who stands in the way of that destruction.

Such an element cannot be reasoned with; it must be dealt with by force. Charlie Kirk's death has proven that once and for all. Here was a man who devoted his life to peaceful debate and reasoned interaction with those he disagreed with. And what did that get him? A sniper's bullet in the neck. It's a lesson that won't be lost on his millions of young fans, nor to the right in general. This is an inflection point, and its consequences will reverberate over both the short and long term. Charlie Kirk has become a martyr, and his blood will nourish the roots of right-wing radicalism for years to come.

Needless to say, this does not bode well for the country. The left has been kicking at the door of political violence for years now, and they might have just broken it down. They aren't going to like what they find on the other side.
Click to expand...

274k likes and counting on a tweet by BlackRedGuard [hammer and sickle icon] [palestinian flag icon] in which he mocks the death of Charlie Kirk. On a platform that's for a large part been abandoned by leftists.

Screenshot_20250911_112423.jpg
 
magoo said:
He was answering a question about how many transgender americans have been mass shooters over the last 10 years when he got shot.

And it could be just that. A trans lunatic with a rifle.

But the way it was done. It´s a public execution.
Click to expand...
By who tho? He was the biggest Israel shill. I think maybe some bad foreign actors got him personally. This will all be one big pretext to get the right to back “our greatest ally”
 
KulturedKaveman said:
By who tho? He was the biggest Israel shill. I think maybe some bad foreign actors got him personally. This will all be one big pretext to get the right to back “our greatest ally”
Click to expand...
The question everyone should be asking is "who benefits the most from this". I think we all know the answer to that question.

It doesn't matter one bit that Charlie supported Israel. He wasn't one of them. Remember, we're talking about people who sacrificed thousands of innocent lives for 9/11. They'd kill a thousand Charlies if it meant accomplishing their goals.

Now we're seeing reports of "foreign intelligence"... Let me guess, Iran?
 
mountainaire said:
The question everyone should be asking is "who benefits the most from this". I think we all know the answer to that question.

It doesn't matter one bit that Charlie supported Israel. He wasn't one of them. Remember, we're talking about people who sacrificed thousands of innocent lives for 9/11. They'd kill a thousand Charlies if it meant accomplishing their goals.

Now we're seeing reports of "foreign intelligence"... Let me guess, Iran?
Click to expand...
Qui Bono - let’s check it out!

Leftists - don’t benefit. They will be under a microscope now.
Rightists - they lost their shill
Israel - they lost their shill

This was the product of an impulsive idiot. Either of the nat soc or Hamas or Tranny persuasion. Nobody benefits from Charlie Kirk taking a dirt nap. If it was a hamas character, maybe Israel dos cos they’ll use this to glass the Middle East. Idk. We need to see how this develops.

Interestingly enough, anyone else notice that nat socs and trannies have similar feeder populations? Why I’m not King Kaveman. I’d bring that up.
 
KulturedKaveman said:
Qui Bono - let’s check it out!

Leftists - don’t benefit. They will be under a microscope now.
Rightists - they lost their shill
Israel - they lost their shill
Click to expand...

From their perspective, he is replaceable, only became famous as a big public figure a year or two ago after they pushed him on their ConInc circuit - to be frank, his career was largely astroturfed. And worse of all, he had some "glitches" in his programming, to his credit, like declaring that October 7 was deliberately planned as a psyop, or that secular Jews are behind some nefarious programs. Granted those were punctual deviations from the ziocon line, but perhaps troubling enough and a sign that he has the potential to break free like Candace or Tucker, in which case it would be very damaging to their cause.
 
mountainaire said:
The question everyone should be asking is "who benefits the most from this". I think we all know the answer to that question.
Click to expand...


I don’t know. This turns Kirk into a martyr. Who wanted him gone the most? Israel? Democrats in the USA?

It doesn't matter one bit that Charlie supported Israel. He wasn't one of them. Remember, we're talking about people who sacrificed thousands of innocent lives for 9/11. They'd kill a thousand Charlies if it meant accomplishing their goals.

Now we're seeing reports of "foreign intelligence"... Let me guess, Iran?
Click to expand...

I doubt we get any real answers honestly. I feel for his family and 2 young kids that grow up without their father. His widow was a beauty pageant winner, she will likely remarry but still this is just sad for the family.

I don’t know who benefits the most, but I know who is hurt the most
 
Wutang said:
I'm like 90% sure the shooter was likely some deranged leftist who was trying to "protect trans kids" or something of the like but there's a 10% chance it might be some groyper type who wanted to take out one of the most influential iocon guys.
Click to expand...

This was a pro assassin. Probably government trained, my only question is if it was our government that trained him or Israel’s
 


This tweet was just yanked, was able to take a snapshot before they removed it:

1757567356020.png

Zinn is also a registered Republican according to another tweet.

 
Last edited:
We are in the final phase of the historical saeculum cycle, and these events will only intensify further. After 100 years, we are entering the Weimar Republic era again (the period with the highest number of politically motivated killings in the last 200 years), but this time on a bigger scale, maybe globally.
If the events in the Middle East open the door to the possibility of building the third temple, then our generation may experience even the Antichrist's attempt to reign. In that case, these crazy days will be remembered as good old times.
 
KulturedKaveman said:
Qui Bono - let’s check it out!

Leftists - don’t benefit. They will be under a microscope now.
Rightists - they lost their shill
Israel - they lost their shill

This was the product of an impulsive idiot. Either of the nat soc or Hamas or Tranny persuasion. Nobody benefits from Charlie Kirk taking a dirt nap. If it was a hamas character, maybe Israel dos cos they’ll use this to glass the Middle East. Idk. We need to see how this develops.
Click to expand...
Haven't seen this theory floated yet, but I'm of the opinion it was a cartel/drug related hit. Have been busy lately and not keeping up with the commentary surrounding re-posturing of DoD to Dept of WAR but here we have the highest profile Trump adjacent public figure out of the arena. Maybe revenge for the strike the other day? Can't take out POTUS so they go for one of his defacto spokesmen to the people?

Of course it's entirely possible it was simply some deranged leftist, but that just doesn't make sense to me. The ones who benefit the most are those who truly hate America and want to destabilize it, as this will just drive the wedge between L & R deeper.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top