Charlie Kirk Thread

www.yahoo.com

Elite Sniper Uncovers Charlie Kirk Assassin’s Critical Error

America’s top sniper reveals the chilling planning, weapon choice, and one mistake that exposes Charlie Kirk’s killer as untrained.
www.yahoo.com www.yahoo.com

“He was probably aiming for the head but didn’t take into consideration the wind, and the bullet pulled a bit,” he explained.

The trained sniper added that the shooter didn’t properly adjust for the bullet’s drop or the firing angle.

Video also suggested a bad trigger pull from a right-handed shooter, which Ranstad said was another sign of inexperience.

For a skilled sniper, hitting the wrong area by inches would be unlikely. To him, the neck shot showed nerves and adrenaline were involved.

He even suggested the killer was probably just an “internet shooter,” someone with practice at a range but without the discipline of a trained soldier.
Click to expand...
 
After thinking about it, only a handful of people have the M.O. of attempting a hit like this. Either state sponsored and carried out by cia/mossad or hired by Soros (or Gates, Zuck etc) or the equivalent . Even if one of the oligarchs did finance the hit, I’m sure they paid for it with a shell company 7 or 8 steps away so they cannot be connected or tried for it. And if it was Israel they will just deny it.
 
starlight said:
People are saying this is AI. Watch after 17 seconds and his hands glitch... Why would they put out an AI video of Trump like this?
Click to expand...
That doesn't look like an AI glitch to me. He's just moving his hands while he talks. He does it again at 28 seconds but with a smaller movement.

I can't say for certain it's not AI, but I didn't see any obvious things like 6 fingers or other AI weirdness like that.

I did think he seemed very strained. He used a lot of references to Charlie being in heaven, and other religious references. I think he believes God is using him and that these events are in God's hands, but he's not used to thinking this way and it's awkward for him.

Also, I noticed he mentioned several other incidents of political violence, but didn't mention the murder of Iryna Zarutska which was blowing up really big right before Charlie Kirk was killed.

He talked about going after the radical left, but it remains to be seen how far he's willing to go with this. Many people online are calling for civil war and summary arrests. I'm pretty sure Trump doesn't want to do this.
 
There are a large number of posts on Twitter now where some leftist posted how happy they were about Kirk's murder, and they were reported to their jobs and got fired.

Typical report is something like "So and so is an anesthesiologist at such and such hospital, who posted that she is celebrating Kirk's death. How can I trust such and such hospital with someone like her working there if she knew I was a conservative?

Followed by a notice from the hospital saying that they do not condone any political violence, and this employee has been terminated. There are 100s of cases like this posted already, and people are organizing to identify everyone who posted like this and go after them.

Lots of people have been calling for civil war, and while I don't think there is a sentiment for the people on the right to start shooting their hard left neighbors and coworkers, there is a sentiment to go after them and ruin them all.

Example:



Another example

 
Chiosboy90 said:
You can't make things up. It's in their DNA. But some people here, still after thousands of videos and endless statistics, defend Black people because "A friend of mine is Black and very smart..."
Click to expand...
at times like this i wish i could take one of those fatigue spreaders and stick him into a holocaust museum so he can do some righteous pilfering or chimp-out in there. not that this is going to advance our cause.

the ensuing friendly fire is bound to be pretty entertaining, though
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top